It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Starchild23
Half of your argument is in saying that something that cannot be defined cannot exist.
If I were to wake up one morning and see a bunch of blue footprints all over the house (floor, walls, ceiling) but not know where they came from, I have undeniable evidence that SOMETHING was in my house, but I cannot define what it was because I don't have enough knowledge of it.
My point here is lack of specific definition does not equate with lack of existence.
Come at me bro.
Originally posted by FRATERPERDURABO
i'll just leave this here:
Enoch's message
Originally posted by Benevolent Heretic
Originally posted by Starchild23
Half of your argument is in saying that something that cannot be defined cannot exist.
That is not my argument. YOU said God exists and you cannot define it except in very illusive terms that don't really mean anything. I don't have any problem with "woo-woo". I meditate and believe in more than the physical, but it's a personal belief and I understand that. I have no interest in people agreeing with me or sharing my beliefs. Nor do I need to have proper nouns like "God" to talk about it.
My resistance comes from the fact that man has now redefined God to mean something that is a little easier to believe in than a big bearded man sitting up in the clouds watching over us... Some people call it a force, some call it The Source, some call it Divine Creator... The list goes on and on. But not ONE can tell me what they mean. No one agrees. Each individual has his or her own interpretation and vision of what this "god" thing is and the only thing they agree on is if you don't believe in it, you're wrong
Yes, I'm an atheist. I opened this thread in hopes of seeing some actual definitions, but alas...
If I were to wake up one morning and see a bunch of blue footprints all over the house (floor, walls, ceiling) but not know where they came from, I have undeniable evidence that SOMETHING was in my house, but I cannot define what it was because I don't have enough knowledge of it.
But if you were born and raised in a house that had blue footprints all overt the walls, would you wake up one morning and consider it undeniable evidence of the presence of something else?
It's not like you're waking up one day and seeing all this new evidence of something having been here. Whatever "evidence" you use for God's existence has been here since the beginning of mankind. I'm interested in what that evidence is, though.
My point here is lack of specific definition does not equate with lack of existence.
I can agree with that. I just think if you're going to say that "GOD" exists, you should be able to tell me what GOD is. You don't have to give a bunch of details, but is it an energy? A being? An entity? You seem to think it's sentient... How do you know this?
Come at me bro.
Make that 'sis'.
Originally posted by Starchild23
reply to post by Benevolent Heretic
The answer is simple: explosions do not automatically build things. They destroy them. Hence, the Big Bang theory is flawed. Besides that, the intricate structure of everything naturally occurring around you happened through two possible ways: either something guided the growth of our world, or the materials of our world came with the design.
Ok, if matter came with the design to become animals and trees, does that not mean that there is an intelligence that CREATED that design? Such complex things are not written by chance.
There you have it. The only way for an intricately detailed design to be created is by something that understands the design. The odds are too great for it to be random...which is supported, as I said, by the Law of Probability.