It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
. . . were taken into captivity to europe.
I have a buttload of other Missler videos to watch as well.
Those who choose?
The fundamental premise of Christianity is that Salvation is by the Grace of God through the Blood of Jesus The Christ for those who choose to receive His said Salvation by faith in Him.
Then you should not say that Jesus was the fulfillment of the Old Testament. You should say that according to your philosophy, "Jesus bears a slight resemblance to something mentioned in the Old Testament and otherwise the Old Testament goes on as before and in fact should not even be called Old but we need to adopt the current Jewish usage and call it the Tanach"
Fulfilling the Old Testament in terms of Salvation through THE MESSIAH vs through slaughtered sheep is wholesale DIFFERENT than claiming rather blasphemously that
GOD'S EVERLASTING PROMISES ARE NOT DEPENDABLE..
My point was that from my experience, the only people who use the term, replacement theory, are the dispensationalists.
I don't recall saying anywhere that I was responsible for how well read you are or aren't.
In your own mind, because that is the ideology you were taught. I quoted the verses from Paul where he explains the process. He interprets the promise to be handed down to its ultimate inheritor who was Jesus, who in turn adopts us as brothers of that inheritance. The fact that you ignore Paul in the New Testament, to me, makes you a cult and not deserving of the name, Christian.
The very idea that ALMIGHTY GOD'S EVERLASTING PROMISES TO ISRAEL COULD POSSIBLY BE CANCELED BY ANYONE OR ANYTHING
IT WELL BEYOND ABSURDLY PREPOSTEROUS as well as GROSSLY UNBIBLICAL.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
. . . were taken into captivity to europe.
Do you have any documentation for this assertion or are you just making this up?
There would have been enough taken to the city of Rome for a display in the triumphal parade for the returning hero of the war, but the majority of ones sold would have been sold at local slave markets and the ones that were not worth the trouble of selling in that way became imperial property and taken to Egypt to work for the Romans there.
When these happenings were reported to the king, he thought that Judea was in revolt. Raging like a wild animal, he set out from Egypt and took Jerusalem by storm. He ordered his soldiers to cut down without mercy those whom they met and to slay those who took refuge in their houses. There was a massacre of young and old, a killing of women and children, a slaughter of virgins and infants. In the space of three days, eighty thousand were lost, forty thousand meeting a violent death, and the same number being sold into slavery.
Roman Empire period presence of Jews in Croatia date to the 2nd century, in Pannonia to the 3rd to 4th century. A finger ring with a Menorah depiction found in Augusta Raurica (Kaiseraugst, Switzerland) in 2001 attests to Jewish presence in Germania Superior.[1] Evidence in towns north of the Loire or in southern Gaul date to the 5th century and 6th centuries.[2]
Antiochus Ephiphanes:
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by BO XIAN
Those who choose?
The fundamental premise of Christianity is that Salvation is by the Grace of God through the Blood of Jesus The Christ for those who choose to receive His said Salvation by faith in Him.
How about: "For all the world"?
You make it seem like there is option A, or there is option B.
I think there is no choice for what kind of salvation you can have, and that if it is not through Jesus, then it is not at all.
My point was that from my experience, the only people who use the term, replacement theory, are the dispensationalists.
I don't recall saying anywhere that I was responsible for how well read you are or aren't.edit on 17-1-2012 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by WarminIndy
Antiochus Ephiphanes:
You are talking about something completely different.
Lonewolf was taking about the Roman destruction of Jerusalem and its aftermath.
You are confusing several different wars and mixing it all up.edit on 17-1-2012 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
I think I might have seen a TV show where there is this old guy sitting behind a desk and rambling on about one thing or another but it is not something I would have payed any attention to other than to figure out after a minute or so that he is not someone I want to listen to.
I think you listen to people like Arnold Murray and Shepherd's Chapel and agree with much of what they say.
I read books, which I do find on the internet by way of the Amazon web site which I like to use and I try to find used books to buy so I can buy more books. I said enough times that I am a Seventh Day Adventist, though I have recently changed some of my views on some important topics which that denomination discusses frequently. The general interpretation of the SDA church is apotelesmatic which is something you can Google and find an Adventist site which explains it. Generally it means a prophecy can have two fulfillments, where it is fulfilled in the past as was the intent of the original prophet for his own time, then there can be a secondary fulfillment in the future so strictly speaking we are neither preterist, or futurists.
You have researched from sites created by Replacement Theologists, and you listened to television shows created by them.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by WarminIndy
I think I might have seen a TV show where there is this old guy sitting behind a desk and rambling on about one thing or another but it is not something I would have payed any attention to other than to figure out after a minute or so that he is not someone I want to listen to.
I think you listen to people like Arnold Murray and Shepherd's Chapel and agree with much of what they say.
What I read is the old Christian writers from antiquity, meaning the earliest people. I would also read the ancient Jewish writers. Mostly what I read are very well reviewed writings on a level of doctoral dissertations from the more reputable universities and seminaries. People who are actual recognized scholars in biblical theology and I avoid people who are writers as their main activity and not really involved in serious scholasticism.
I appreciate the addition to my Heavenly account.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by BO XIAN
I appreciate the addition to my Heavenly account.
Which explains why I say things like that (what comes off as being insulting, to you) which is that there is a slew of people on this sub-forum who believe that they are buying their rapture ticket by spreading this particular ideology. I need to point out to people who may not know any better, that these people are here buying their way into heaven by recruiting people into their cult. People should understand that this is a cult and not normal Christianity and do not represent Christianity, although they may seem to, because of how they are the predominant voice on this sub-forum. There is a reason for that and it is not their correctness but it is their peculiarity. You have to think of it as the internet version of these people who knock on your door and leave their literature about one of two things depending on their particular cult, the end of the world as we know it, or an otherwise unknown world in American pre-history. Those people are not promoting the use of internet forum posting and stick to their old, tried and true methods, leaving the field wide open for this group you find represented here which is the Zionist, pro-war, anti-Muslim, rapturing and takeover of the world by Jews believing group, otherwise known as dispensationalists.
I should note that this does not obviously include everyone on this sub-forum but generally whoever you see denouncing me on a regular bases, they would be the ones offended by my exposing their doctrines.edit on 17-1-2012 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
What you are, is not Christian. You are the maker of a new religion based on nothing more than revision of verses that do not justify Replacement Theology in an attempt to make Replacement Theology the new religion of the last age. It is no longer Christianity, it should be renamed and since you are nothing more than a Joseph Smith wannabe, why don't you just go ahead and introduce the name of your new religion?
If I thought I was somehow leading anyone or anything, I hope it would be for people to discover truth on their own and not from a predigested ideology. I am not seeking agreement with me but the objective truth as they discover it. I do look for inspiration in the books I buy but I am very selective in what goes into my head and keep it to where I am reading fellow seekers and not people who think they already know everything worth knowing.
. . . you are nothing more than a Joseph Smith wannabe . . .
That's funny that you believe me when I say I might know who that person is but don't believe me when I said I don't follow any of his teachings or even watched him enough to even know what they are exactly.
So you know who I was talking about.
Hey what happened to Bo Xian's claim that dispensationalist views are traceable to NT times?
What early Christian writers are you referring to? These perhaps?
Anti-Semitism of the Early Church Fathers
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by WarminIndy
That's funny that you believe me when I say I might know who that person is but don't believe me when I said I don't follow any of his teachings or even watched him enough to even know what they are exactly.
So you know who I was talking about.Hey what happened to Bo Xian's claim that dispensationalist views are traceable to NT times?
What early Christian writers are you referring to? These perhaps?
Anti-Semitism of the Early Church Fathers
How does any of this have to do with anything?
Was Jesus an orthodox Jew? Is Jesus the Word of God made flesh? Did Jesus know all the prophesies of the ancient prophets?
And the biggest question is this, is Jesus alive right at this moment in the flesh?
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by WarminIndy
Jesus was the expected Messiah the Redeemer, come in the flesh and he died and was raised again and now is glorified in a form as we will be when we receive our glorified bodies in Heaven, where we will see him at some point. We will be in Heaven awaiting his arrival in the great hall where we will be among the assembly of the saints.edit on 17-1-2012 by jmdewey60 because: (no reason given)
1 John 4:1Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. 2Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God: 3And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. 4Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world. 5They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them. 6We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by WarminIndy
. . . right?
No.
This Epistle was written in Ephesus between the years 95–110