It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by pikestaff
If that object is coming straight at us from the sun, in a straight line, how did it get past the sun? in any case, it could not keep a straight line and keep heading for us, the earth is spiraling through space, as the suns orbit rises and lowers as it bisects the galaxy plain, the damn thing has to be controlled, who in their right mind would crash a space craft into a planet??
do you actually think a Nibiru like planet would be the size of Earth?
Yet Sedna does Exist and its Confirmed!! and The Scientist are Baffled as to why its there as it Should not be there!!! Some planets Lost Moon/planetoid !! or Brown Dwarf
My best question to all and i Never get A Strait Answer
is when you look at a Photo of a Galaxy buy the Hubble telescope or even a Old 1950s Photo Frame from a Old Observatory & old Telescope
One of the Moons might, According to the Sumerian's this already happened before, carving out the Pacific Basin and creating the Asteroid Belt. Our own Moon, in my estimation, is a spacecraft also, placed in orbit for the shipments of gold, and as a way of further balancing Earth, which still has a wobble. I have to believe this is a rescue mission. We quickly approach the Galactic Center.
Just because you can't see it.. doesn't mean that its not there. A word of wisdom. There are many things in this world and the next that cannot be perceived with a mind that is incapable of comprehending their existence. Open your consciousness and you will see.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Wolfenz
A planet is something that orbits the Sun. A planet is large enough to remove other objects from its orbit. Pluto does not. Asteroids do not.
ok just as some scientist claim something big smashed into our planet and and caused the moon to form a Rouge Stray planet Space 1999 well moon anyways
Sedna has an orbit that is not stable in the long run so it seems that something affected its orbit.
do you actually think a Nibiru like planet would be the size of Earth?
Not sure what you mean here because Nibiru is fictional and no planet can have orbital properties that been ascribed to Nibiru.
well according to Sumerian Text some big object passes
Objects do crash into the Sun, but they are not planet sized or even Pluto or moon sized. They are small.
how big are these comets ?
2 Comets Crashing Into the Sun
Yet Sedna does Exist and its Confirmed!! and The Scientist are Baffled as to why its there as it Should not be there!!! Some planets Lost Moon/planetoid !! or Brown Dwarf
Sedna does not have an orbit that enters the orbits of the known planets. That is quite unlike the claims of the fictional Nibiru. Nemesis was also supposed to enter the orbits of the inner planets. The problem has to do with transfer of momentum. That happens with the Moon. It moves away from the Earth. The Earth also moves away from the Sun.
I know this.. that why it should not be there its a possible lost stray planetoid !
Sedna has an orbit suggesting that it has interacted with another object. That could have been a passing star. It certainly does not suggest a 9th planet or a companion to the Sun.
you know there are binary star systems right and our might me or could of been
My best question to all and i Never get A Strait Answer
is when you look at a Photo of a Galaxy buy the Hubble telescope or even a Old 1950s Photo Frame from a Old Observatory & old Telescope
Sorry, the remainder of your post got a bit hard to read and I am unclear as to what you were asking.
However, its deep red spectral slope is indicative of high concentrations of organic material on its surface, and its weak methane absorption bands indicate that methane on Sedna's surface is ancient, rather than freshly deposited. This means that Sedna is too cold for methane to evaporate from its surface and then fall back as snow, as happens on Triton and probably on Pluto.
Models of internal heating via radioactive decay suggest that Sedna might be capable of supporting a subsurface ocean of liquid water
The discovery of Sedna resurrected the question of which astronomical objects should be considered planets and which should not. On March 15, 2004, articles on Sedna in the popular press reported that a tenth planet had been discovered. This question was answered under the International Astronomical Union definition of a planet, adopted on August 24, 2006, which mandated that a planet must have cleared the neighborhood around its orbit. Sedna has a Stern–Levison parameter estimated to be much less than 1,[d] and therefore cannot be considered to have cleared the neighborhood, even though no other objects have yet been discovered in its vicinity. To qualify as a dwarf planet, Sedna must be shown to be in hydrostatic equilibrium. It is bright enough, and therefore large enough, that this is expected to be the case.[55]
Originally posted by Wolfenz
How can NASA see the Color (red) and a Unusual surface of Sedna ?
Originally posted by ColAngus
Ok, you guys win. Nibiru is incoming on we're all screwed.
I figured much ... avoiding.....
just take a Photo Either of a Galaxy from present day from the Hubble scope to a 1950s
area Black & white photo From an Observatory made in the 30s that's still functional in the 50s ... and made this Shot !!
is clear enough for ya....
Do you Agree that those stars that are in the Green Boxes are from Our Galaxy
just a simple question ..... then i can see where you are at ...
How can NASA see the Color (red) and a Unusual surface of Sedna ?
Not sure what you mean here because Nibiru is fictional and no planet can have orbital properties that been ascribed to Nibiru.
1. The Pacific is not an impact basin.
2. The asteroid belt has more matter than the Pacific basin
3. Our Moon is not a spacecraft - has been there for 500 billion years
So you are saying here that the Ancient Sumerians, the world's very first true civilization, sat around writing fictional stories on those clay tablets? You just don't know how much that makes me laugh.
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Wolfenz
I figured much ... avoiding.....
Not at all. You might not realize it, but your writing is unclear
just take a Photo Either of a Galaxy from present day from the Hubble scope to a 1950s
area Black & white photo From an Observatory made in the 30s that's still functional in the 50s ... and made this Shot !!
is clear enough for ya....
No.
Here is what I think you are trying to post.
1. Get a photo from Hubble
2. Get a photo from the same area of the sky taken 60 years ago from an 80 year old telescope
Then what? Did you photoshop something? Did you take a photo?
Do you Agree that those stars that are in the Green Boxes are from Our Galaxy
just a simple question ..... then i can see where you are at ...
Why would anyone answer such a question?
How can NASA see the Color (red) and a Unusual surface of Sedna ?
It is possible to analyze the incoming light to see what parts of the spectrum are there.edit on 17-1-2012 by stereologist because: (no reason given)edit on 17-1-2012 by stereologist because: (no reason given)
Avoiding the Question still ...
I will say this in the simplest way i can
are these Stars in the Green outline boxes From Our Galaxy ?
YES or NO
the third star ( Biggest one ) in a green box left side from top down !
kinda looks like this in a way if you magnified the Image
now if you dont get that it pointless
Originally posted by stereologist
reply to post by Wolfenz
Avoiding the Question still ...
I will say this in the simplest way i can
are these Stars in the Green outline boxes From Our Galaxy ?
YES or NO
The purpose of this question is what?
the third star ( Biggest one ) in a green box left side from top down !
kinda looks like this in a way if you magnified the Image
It may remind you of the photograph of an exoplanet, but it is unlikely to be. It is more likely a chance alignment of stars.
we can NOT say for sure unless there is a better high resolution blow up of the same photo to that particular point showing the star in question
PS Your continued unclear writing can be seen here again
now if you dont get that it pointless
I believe that you are unaware of how poorly you express yourself. That's ok. I am trying to patient with you. Please don't pretend that I am avoiding anything. It is hard enough asking for you to be clear and I am guessing it is going to be much harder to clear up a problem if I provide a statement not in mesh with what you are thinking because of problems understanding your writing.
PS Your continued unclear writing can be seen here again
now if you dont get that it pointless
kinda looks like this in a way if you magnified the Image
It may remind you of the photograph of an exoplanet, but it is unlikely to be.
It is more likely a chance alignment of stars.
Originally posted by nineix
I honestly have a difficult time understanding the grammatical choices, and sporadic punctuation of Wolfenz myself.
It's not a question of English. Every single individual word in English is understandable, even your use of 'lingo' as a colloquial word derived initially from the Southern US. When, however, Wolfenz puts all those words together, it's almost akin to the game 52 card pickup.
Apologies, as I mean no offense, but I have to support Stereologist in statement of difficulty in decoding the word choice arrangements of Wolfenz.
What I'm interested to know, and why I popped in before getting sucked into to this fascinating dialog, is what happened? 'IT' was heading right toward Earth, with no less than 7 exclamation marks too.
It ought to be hear by now, no? Yes? Seven exclamation marks means it was going pretty fast right?
Sterologist: so far, you're spot on, and I really don't know how you've hung onto the debate for as long as you have without giving up in exasperated frustration.
Thank you for your hard work and contributions in trying to explain something in terms that don't involve magical sparlkley god-like beings come to save our hollow earth with it's hollow moon from it's seemingly hollow-headed inhabitants.
Well done and Kudos. I'm tracking back and giving you stars.
Originally posted by Wolfenz
...i will not get an Answer
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by stereologist
I choose not to answer and that is that.
www.abovetopsecret.com...