It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
In any case, a few minutes checking shows the whole story to be bogus... Apart from an approximate agreement in orbital inclination, the two can hardly be described as "nearly identical".
"Space-to-space surveillance is a whole new ball game made possible by a finessed group of sensors and sensor suites, which we think the X-37B may be using to maintain a close watch on China's nascent space station," said Spaceflight editor Dr David Baker...
..."The parallels with X-37B are clear," Dr Baker says in Spaceflight, the long established magazine of the British Interplanetary Society.
"With a period differential of about 19 seconds, the two vehicles will migrate toward or against each other, converging or diverging, roughly every 170 orbits."
X37B can change orbits at will though I doubt it is spying on China's platform. We have better satellites for that
Originally posted by pause4thought
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
The OP has made no reference to that fictional plane whatsoever.
Originally posted by pause4thought
Sorry, I don't think I was clear enough. What I meant was why does the US appear to put ever greater emphasis on military solutions rather than engaging in substantive diplomatic discussions over perceived threats to its interests? No-one can deny China is investing very heavily in its military and seeking to expand its sphere of influence. But this type of intensive spying operation could easily be perceived as provocative, as you suggest, leading to an ever greater deterioration in relations.
You could argue its good for the economy and it keeps 'the hawks' happy. But is this what the American people want to see — war-mongering as a response to the expansion of a new super-power?
Originally posted by SevenThunders
Originally posted by pause4thought
Sorry, I don't think I was clear enough. What I meant was why does the US appear to put ever greater emphasis on military solutions rather than engaging in substantive diplomatic discussions over perceived threats to its interests?
Maybe it's because the murderous leaders of China have already stated their goal of colonizing North America and slaughtering the current inhabitants.
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Yeah - Stealth was a good movie, and the F/A-37 Talon looks cool.
I'm not sure if the OP was serious or not thinking that plane is real tho - you never know around here!edit on 5-1-2012 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Aloysius the Gaul
Originally posted by SevenThunders
Originally posted by pause4thought
Sorry, I don't think I was clear enough. What I meant was why does the US appear to put ever greater emphasis on military solutions rather than engaging in substantive diplomatic discussions over perceived threats to its interests?
Maybe it's because the murderous leaders of China have already stated their goal of colonizing North America and slaughtering the current inhabitants.
I completely missed that - where is that stated??
OTOH I think the correct answer is because the US political system is itself conflict ridden and combative, that they simply are not trained to think in diplomatic terms - European diplomacy, for all it's screw ups, has the example of 500 years of internecine warfare behind it giving all sorts of examples of how to, and how not to, conduct diplomacy.
The USA needs many more wasteful, expensive and pointless wars before it learns the same lessons.
edit on 5-1-2012 by Aloysius the Gaul because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by pause4thought
reply to post by TheMindWar
That's war-mongering if ever I heard it. (You seem to live up to your screen name.)
Whatever happened to diplomacy?..
edit on 5/1/12 by pause4thought because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by alfa1
In any case, a few minutes checking shows the whole story to be bogus....
Apart from an approximate agreement in orbital inclination, the two can hardly be described as "nearly identical".
Originally posted by SevenThunders
Originally posted by pause4thought
Sorry, I don't think I was clear enough. What I meant was why does the US appear to put ever greater emphasis on military solutions rather than engaging in substantive diplomatic discussions over perceived threats to its interests? No-one can deny China is investing very heavily in its military and seeking to expand its sphere of influence. But this type of intensive spying operation could easily be perceived as provocative, as you suggest, leading to an ever greater deterioration in relations.
You could argue its good for the economy and it keeps 'the hawks' happy. But is this what the American people want to see — war-mongering as a response to the expansion of a new super-power?
Maybe it's because the murderous leaders of China have already stated their goal of colonizing North America and slaughtering the current inhabitants.
A better question is why do liberals love tyrants and human rights abusing communist nations?