It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AllUrChips
reply to post by Praetorius
Sweet thanks for the link! I will have to check it out
Originally posted by Praetorius
reply to post by links234
Perhaps you can answer some questions for us, then - and these ARE honest questions:
So the reason the government outright refuses to clarify the situation, and merely relies on prosecution instead is...?
The reason former IRS agent Joseph Bannister was acquitted by a jury when the federal government went after him is...?
The reason an Illinois jury acquitted Gaylon Harrell of tax evasion charges because the judge could not provide a federal statute requiring him to pay as specified under the Illinois constitution is...?
It appears that whenever a jury requests in-code evidence that a person is required to pay federal taxes, the government is either unwilling or unable to provide that evidence to the satisfaction of a jury. Failing to do so even one time, despite how many successful prosecutions they may be able to secure, is damning on the face. When the question comes up, why is it not simply being proven to juries of our peers that yes - in fact, the law is right here?
There is hereby imposed on the taxable income of...
Gross income means all income from whatever source derived, including (but not limited to) the following items:
(1) Compensation for services, including fees, commissions, fringe benefits, and similar items;
(2) Gross income derived from business;
(3) Gains derived from dealings in property;
Returns with respect to income taxes shall be made by the following:
(1)(A) Every individual having for the taxable year gross income which equals or exceeds the exemption amount
When a return of tax is required under this title or regulations, the person required to make such return shall, without assessment or notice and demand from the Secretary, pay such tax to the internal revenue officer with whom the return is filed, and shall pay such tax at the time and place fixed for filing the return (determined without regard to any extension of time for filing the return).
Why aren't you asking that, as well? They're stealing from you, too. Their own books define income as something other than the fair exchange of wages for labor. They also define "someone required to pay federal income tax" as something different than you and I, as well as providing very confusing information in claiming it's a voluntary tax.
Can you shine some light here, that I haven't been able to find them doing clearly? Thanks in advance.
26 USC 7806(b) says that Title 26 is not the law. In other words, "No inference, implication or presumption of legislative construction shall be drawn or made by reason of the location or grouping of any particular section or provision or portion of this title..." N.B. "legislative construction" means "law." 26 USC 4161(a) says lures must be taxed. Nordby supply Co. applied 26 USC 7806(b) to invalidate the lure tax. The Internal Revenue Code is not the law. It only defines a contract between the IRS and the individual.