It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LuxFestinus
reply to post by apodictic
There is a conspiracy/agenda here. I am reminded of this quote from Ayan Rand:
Did you really think we want those laws observed? said Dr. Ferris. We want them to be broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against... We're after power and we mean it... There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Reardon, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be
much easier to deal with. ('Atlas Shrugged' 1957) [WMail Issue #23]
Originally posted by Blackmarketeer
Point of contention with the article headline: this guy is a FORMER marine, he is no longer on active duty.
Hard to feel sympathy for an idiot.
Originally posted by ThoughtForms
reply to post by TXRabbit
there are no curse words strong enough to describe your flawed logic and heartless attitude.
god willing you experience what its like to be done by laws you didn't know existed...
and maybe it'll open your snippin' eyes.
Originally posted by ThoughtForms
reply to post by Annee
IGNORANCE OF REALITY YOUR FAULT!! YELLING!! SHOUTING!!! AHHHHHH!
grow up. I'd love to see you maintain your cold demeanor with regards to this topic if it were your mother father son or daughter who'd accidentally broken some absurd irrelevant and/or poorly legislated law.
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
reply to post by Annee
That's what the article claims he did.
The online gun-law information Jerome read was inaccurate, however, and his late September arrest initiated what may become a protracted criminal saga. He hasn’t yet been indicted by a grand jury, but there may be little legal wiggle-room if he is.
Read more: dailycaller.com...
Besides, as Ive already said checking is irrelevant. You think if you get bunk info from a city clerk, cop or lawyer suddenly all the charges will just go away? Bloomberg himself could have told this guy he was okay to carry and if he got stopped he'd still be screwed.
Ignorance of law is never an excuse.
There is accurate information online. You have to make sure you go to an official government site.
Can he show on a government internet site where he was mislead by confusing or inaccurate information?
I doubt it.
Originally posted by Doc Gator
This is so stupid. If the 1st, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, 7th, 8th, 9th and 10th amendments all apply equally to all the citizens in all states, why not the 2nd?
I didn't know about the 911 incident. If these are acts of civil disobedience, my hat is off to them.edit on 3-1-2012 by Doc Gator because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Annee
Ignorance of the law. YOUR FAULT.
And leave God out of this.
Originally posted by thisguyrighthere
Originally posted by Annee
Ignorance of the law. YOUR FAULT.
And leave God out of this.
We went over this.
How the hell is ignorance of the law not[/t] an excuse? Especially when there has been no harm caused or victim?
Originally posted by ThoughtForms
reply to post by Bixxi3
you underestimate the abilities of a court room to spot a liar. The reality is that sometimes people would use that excuse, maybe it may become the most common lie told, but there would still be people who were telling the truth and cases where the crime was minor enough (such as this one) that an exception should be made.