It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
According to the Ramban (Nachmanides), the primary purpose of the sacrifice was that by being involved in the slaughter of an animal, the person bringing it would also experience vicarious death. When the Cohen-Priest slaughtered the animal and burned it on the alter, the person bringing it would feel he himself had been killed and burned for having gone against the will of God. Furthermore, God gave man the power of intellect so that he might be able to perfect himself. When a person sins, it is as if he has rejected his God-given intellect. Since the main thing distinguishing a man from the animals is his intellect, when a person sins he is actually identifying with the animals. For this reason, an animal must be sacrificed.
On a deeper level, man consists of two elements, the animal and the divine; and these two elements are in constant conflict with each other. While the divine in man pulls him towards the spiritual, the animal in his draws him toward the physical and the mundane. When a person sins, he must therefore bring an animal as a sacrifice. By being an offering to God, the animal itself is elevated. The animal in man, which caused him to sin, is then brought back under the subjugation to the divine. – Aryeh Kaplan, Jerusalem: The Eye of The Universe, pg. 109
By being an offering to God, the animal itself is elevated. The animal in man, which caused him to sin, is then brought back under the subjugation to the divine.
On a deeper level, man consists of two elements, the animal and the divine; and these two elements are in constant conflict with each other. While the divine in man pulls him towards the spiritual, the animal in his draws him toward the physical and the mundane. When a person sins, he must therefore bring an animal as a sacrifice. By being an offering to God, the animal itself is elevated. The animal in man, which caused him to sin, is then brought back under the subjugation to the divine. – Aryeh Kaplan, Jerusalem: The Eye of The Universe, pg. 109
Originally posted by absolutely
reply to post by cloudyday
if what is not superior can b killed who is gonna kill inferiors that lives from killing?
Originally posted by dontreally
Much deeper than what were usually taught, eh?edit on 3-1-2012 by dontreally because: (no reason given)
Although I find the logic a bit ignorant and superstitious, one could say it's a win win in this way of thinking I guess, for the time era pertained.
Now what about the Satanist that sacrifice animals? How does this play out in their religious perspective?
If God does exist, I doubt he would take pleasure in seeing one of his creations destroying another one of his creations for "spiritual" reasons.
The scientists extracted cells from the muscle of a live pig and then put them in a broth of other animal products. The cells then multiplied and created muscle tissue. They believe that it can be turned into something like steak if they can find a way to artificially "exercise" the muscle.
Originally posted by The1Prettiest1One
I have a big problem with it. It is quite twisted. At best it's the product of a less-evolved mentality.
A bit ignorant? Maybe you should expand your reading into esoteric philosophy and mysticism. There's not a religion on earth that doesn't subscribe to the axiom 'as above so below', and nothing - no 'discoveries' in science, will ever change the scientific validity of that truth.
You don't see the moral difference between sacrificing in order to get something out of an archetypal-demon principle, and sacrificing as a way to come closer to the source of all?
It's a shame so few people have the mental or spiritual capacity to appreciate the magnitude of this concept.
1
Thou shalt not kill. (Elf Exodus 20 v5)
Thou shalt not kill. (Elf Deuteronomy 5v17)