It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by MrWax11
reply to post by Amanda5
It's a complicated issue. I worked for a company that received money from the 2009 stimulus package. I lost my job later that year because of cut backs. Why? I don't know. They just received huge sums of money from the government yet still many were laid off at my facility. I received unemployment through the state of Texas for the first and only time of my life. The federal government added a whopping $25 per week to my unemployment as part of their package.
Couldn't find a job for months and had my home foreclosed on in 2010 after paying my mortgage and taxes on time for 8 years. 3 payments behind and I was out. My old home still sits empty until this day and I have a small apartment. "They" would rather have my home sit empty than allow me, and my children, who has worked all his life and NEVER sponged off of government programs to be homeless if that was the case.
But the issue also is that if "they" let some homeless people live in these homes for nothing many of these people who became homeless from doing nothing will continue to do nothing and ride out the freebies for as long as they can.
Catch 22 I guess!!!!
Originally posted by Amanda5
Title - 3.5 Million Homeless & 18.5 Million Vacant Homes in the US
Originally posted by Amanda5
Why would any government want their people on the street and homeless?
Originally posted by Amanda5
Why is there an assumption that people are homeless because they have mental health problems? Maybe some homeless people do have mental health problems but I believe it would only be a small percentage.
If anyone has a mental health problem it is every member of government who thinks they are actually helping the people of their country.
There has to be a solution - image if every single homeless person - squatted in every single vacant home. Just as an example - I wonder how difficult it would be to get them out - for them to move straight back in again. I wonder how the news would report the activities and how the public would react...hmm.
All I know is that having homeless people and having vacant homes - should equal - problem solved. Is society so messed up that people still cannot see this reality? Thank you for the input thus far - hopefully more discussion will come.
Much Peace...
Originally posted by Kali74
Great thread OP. Many are calling for a moratorium on foreclosures. I think a lot should happen before tossing someone out their home. Once a person becomes homeless it becomes much harder to regain employment, setting someone up to a much longer dependency on "welfare". In many cases a foreclosure is done illegally but still favor is given to the banks in the process of determining if a foreclosure was illegal, with the person/family unable to reside in the house during the court case.
I understand where people come from when they say that is doesn't make sense to just give people homes and it's somewhat true however, perhaps a program can be set up (more government..I know) that is some sort of life boat for families that fell on hard times. Our entitlement programs are such a failure, the whole thing needs a revamp. You don't qualify for help until you're destitute and as soon as you start climbing up you're cut off and end up falling back into the hole.
I don't honestly have a solution I just know we are in crisis and the rich keep getting richer and are hoarding the wealth to the point it feels abusive. As a free person, I don't want to punish someone's success but how many times are we going to hear about XYZ Corp. made billions in profit then shut down a plant or laid off 1,000 workers or received a bailout or got millions back in tax rebates?
We live in insanity.