'The world's dirtiest oil': Satellite photos reveal the relentless expansion of Canada's controv, page 2
Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 25 times


reply posted on 2-1-2012 @ 03:21 PM by vwguy780
What a fantastic topic for my first ever post on here! See, I live in Alberta, work for the biggest Caterpillar dealer in the world, and I tend to be on the supporting side of the tar sands. Before you lash out at me, or think I'm some troll, please ponder a few simple facts. Bitumen crude is the backbone of almost a third of the US oil supply, and consists of 50% of canadian oil. Those are some pretty big numbers folks. What other viable options are there for energy sources at the current moment that are in the average consumers grasp?

Hybrid vehicles?
www.forbes.com...

Nuclear power?
Do I even need to post a link to this one?

Off shore/foreign oil?
*see above

The other option is hemp? Any idea what those fertilizers do to the soil? Heard of fertilizer runoff into watershed and wetlands? And what happens if Monsanto gets ahold of a GMO hempseed? You really want them controlling our food supply AND energy production? Give your head a shake.
Without fossil fuels I would not have a computer to read tripe like this.... A job to go to, or money to put food on the table for my family. Production, mining, and extraction of ANY energy source we utilize right now is harmful to the environment in some form or another... Plant it, mine it, whatever. It's just getting really tiring, hearing these interest and environmental groups whine about "dirty oil". We keep hearing about how Canada is a pretty big greenhouse gas contributor as well. Ever see those pictures of people in India and China walking around in a browny orange haze with a dust mask on? I don't recall seeing anyone EVER wearing one of those here. How about some of the rivers/garbage dumps down there as well? Maybe those tar sands really aren't the biggest world environmental crisis we are facing right now... But they keep coming up for some reason. Maybe check out the REforestation being done up there. The restoration of wetlands. These areas have had billions spent to restore them after they have been mined. That always seems to stay out of the media for some reason. The arguments against are well informed and very insightful, but the benefits of these projects far outweigh the drawbacks.
On another note, this hybrid car idea really kinda cracks me up. The cost of a HE vehicle is double to triple the cost of a gas or diesel powered vehicle to begin with, AND you still have to put fuel in it. Much less consumption of course, but who can afford one? I'll tell you! Those people who don't care about the cost of fuel to begin with, and if I'm given the option between a Prius or a Jeep, we're goin offroading fellas. Fact is... Fort Mac isn't the problem. The problem is that there is no viable alternative to the fuel we use currently. And it's a whole lot easier for people to complain and post pictures of tarsands than to actually do something about it. Until hybrid technology improves, or I don't have to go and raid the fryer oil bin at McDicks to make my own biodiesel, please oh please shut up about "dirty oil".... It's all dirty in some from.


reply posted on 2-1-2012 @ 06:01 PM by SmertSpionam1
reply to post by AzureSky



Actually the hemp industry was around a long time ago, it was around WW2 after we looted German technology
did the chem companies start making products to replace hemp. Thus the making of mary-jane madness movies and outlawing hemp do to it's relations with the bad weed. I agree 100% that the growing of hemp would solve alot of our problems. Everytime I see forest clear cut I think of hemp
edit on 2-1-2012 by SmertSpionam1 because: FN retarded



reply posted on 5-1-2012 @ 06:09 PM by balanc3
Hemp planting in addition to crop rotation, could assure that there's little to no need for fertilizers. After all weeds seem to grow indefinitely without fertilization.

Supporters of current oil policies seem to ignore that Demand for oil is part of the problem, in addition to our generally inefficient lifestyles. those two factors keep working together to drive up prices year after year.

The bio-fuels market really has a lot of options, hemp, rapeseed, salicornia, and others. At this point defending oil is KIND OF like defending slavery. The energy industry in general are bordering on Financial and Environmental Terrorism at this point.

The trillions invested in securing oil from other countries through warfare, could have changed the very way the world works by now. It seems unimaginable to me that in this money driven world, a TRILLION dollars couldn't fix just about any problem.

Oil, Energy, Big Pharma, Defense spending, these groups or industries, have been making money for a long time and all the people they employ have enjoyed their success, as well these groups have worked along with political institutions to ensure the continuity of their respective businesses.

These potent industries have contributed so much to our lives, its hard to imagine abandoning so many millions worldwide who are a part of these industries. But these industries have poisoned waterways, scarred up natural lands, nearly extincted the gulf of mexico, and guess what? one day the families and decendants of the people who support/work for these industries will suffer the consequences along with the rest of us. we are all in this together.

There was a quote from jurassic park, forgive me for using it but....." Scientists were so caught up in the idea of "if we could", they didn't stop to think"if we should"..... I think with a large population this earth's people believing in Global Warming (caused by us humans and our chemicals) there shlould be a complimentary belief that the oil industry is bad and destructive.

In short, there is enough money being spent around the world to solve or eliminate our dependence on oil, whether from the sea or land or sands. Its a sh1++y product, one that ALL countries have been addicted to like crack babies, and I think the energy industry in all its iterations should be charged with treason or sedition or terrorism and be forced to use thier resources to free the world from its addiction to oil.

Oil has empowered nations to become forces of terror against the US, and its " a good thing"? REally?!?!?!


reply posted on 5-1-2012 @ 07:38 PM by RightWingAvenger
reply to post by predator0187



The fact that the American public doesn't care concerns me. The fact that people say "I like Obama" "I like Hillary"

Both of those chowderheads are talking about the pipeline as if it is a good option. It's not. It won't be a good option...Soon Canada and the US will have the same level of birth defects and pollution as China...It won't happen overnight but in 3 years time we'll see some "change"

It's been a work in progress long before Obummer came to office. It's absolutely absurd to consider destroying a fresh water supply for short term gain. Why don't we just compost all of poop in methane digestors?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



An unusual tree called Jaboticaba
  Posted 8 days ago with 77 member flags
Haunting pics of abandoned cities around the world
  Posted 4 days ago with 63 member flags
The Mysterious Socotra Island (Must See!)
  Posted 1 days ago with 60 member flags
Strange Sounds (UK) published on youtube on 5/13/2012
  Posted 16 days ago with 53 member flags
Pole Shift Data You Shouldn\'t Ignore
  Posted 13 days ago with 46 member flags