It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
Think about it, 100million dollars in note form. Where the hell are you going to store that??
In sum the communist probably have murdered something like 110,000,000, or near two-thirds of all those killed by all governments, quasi-governments, and guerrillas from 1900 to 1987. Of course, the world total itself it shocking. It is several times the 38,000,000 battle-dead that have been killed in all this century's international and domestic wars. Yet the probable number of murders by the Soviet Union alone--one communist country-- well surpasses this cost of war. And those murders of communist China almost equal it.
“The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism.”
Originally posted by ElectricUniverse
reply to post by Unrealised
The worst part about today's communists is that you are so willing to be IGNORANT about the history of this system that most of you are willing to dismiss and ignore the stories from people who actually EXPERIENCED the disease that is socialism/communism...
Through communism over 110 million people were murdered in less than 100 years. Millions more have been/were imprisoned because they would not accept communism.
Communism has only brought suffering and death to the world, yet ignorant people who are willing to swallow every lie told by a few, and are so lazy that they can't even pick up a history book, or even read everything that Marx and Engels wrote about it, still want the world to accept the DISEASE that is communism...
That is what communism has brought, and will continue to bring to the world, and to the people of the world, suffering and death.
BTW, I am not from the "50s", to this day there are still communist/socialist dictatorships around the world in case some people didn't know...
edit on 28-12-2011 by ElectricUniverse because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by apacheman
reply to post by Dasher
And yet again you fail to offer any logic to sustain your claims that a wealth cap tramples freedom, or what freedom you would lose, or by what instrument you claim to derive the right to take more than you need.
I know you're young and believe somehow, someday, you, too will be a multi-billionaire, but let's face facts: it ain't bloody likely.
A wealth cap isn't communist, socialist, or anything political, really, it's just a sensible limit on how much we as a society are willing to allow one of us to take from that which we all must draw from.
A cap doesn't deprive anyone of anything substantive, the people it would most directly effect wouldn't even notice, for the most part, save in their ego games of who has the biggest pile. And in their ability to buy governments and spread misery throughout the world, of course.
Instead of offering emotional rants about freedoms you don't understand and can't articulate, try offering some logically sustainable reasons why you think it is a bad idea for more people to have access to more money. No one is talking about simply taking money from the super-rich and giving it away for frivolities. The premise is that those monies would be restored to productive circulation by way of good jobs that pay decent wages.
The "kills incentive" argument is plainly false: a billion dollar cap clearly would not kill the incentive for a minimum wage worker to want to do better than minimum wage, nor would it make a middle class worker say "damn, no point in trying". That argument is plainly silly on its face.
The "tramples freedom" argument is equally plainly silly. What freedom are you talking about? The "freedom" to lust after untrammeled wealth that you will never attain?
I prefer to look at the real freedom a cap would give: the freedom from hunger and want, the freedom from fear of sickness and homelessness, the freedom from sick sociopaths buying and perverting governments.
We most certainly can build a more equitable world, but it seems some among us would miss too much the ability to look down upon the squalid poor, finding emotional superiority in their distance from them.
Originally posted by apacheman
reply to post by Dasher
A wealth cap isn't communist, socialist, or anything political, really, it's just a sensible limit on how much we as a society are willing to allow one of us to take from that which we all must draw from.
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
But it always ends up being political, doesn't it?
Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
Think about it, 100million dollars in note form. Where the hell are you going to store that??
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by maestromason
Please tell me your omnipotent highness, sovereign grandmaster of the temple of darkness, ...........
why must you believe in a supreme being and be financially wealthy or have a good job,
to become a mason, with childish handsignals and ear whispering secrets.......
To be right wing means taking religion seriously as well as being a capitalist, so maybe...just maybe
masonry is all about protecting global capitalism and the masonically sought after one world government...
or maybe it has to do with aliens
Your friend,
EarthCitizen
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by ElectricUniverse
Karl Marx was an idiot. Why must you denigrate socialism with his name attached to everything socialistic?
Canada and western europe does not believe in karl marx, yet they have enjoyed prosperous economic conditions for decades and still do to a lesser extent.
The nazis and facists were not marxists either since they hated communism, gypsies and jews.
Marxism does NOT equal socialism!!!!
Get it:yet???