It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11: the numbers scan and pronounce too well.

page: 1
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 01:49 PM
link   
Whoever was responsible for that dreadful day, I had an idea that made me think it was planned by those who know about modern societies need for easy catchphrases.


Nine eleven, as numbers, scan and read too well to be a mere horrible coincidence.

It wasn’t 10/23, 12/28, 4/18, etc…it was 9/11.

One syllable and then three. It scans in an easy to say and recall way.

It’s sinister, I believe preselected and easy to remember for a media friendly world.

Any opinions?




posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 01:54 PM
link   
All we need to know IMO is that 9/11 was carried out by those who are trying to win this election by smearing Ron Paul's name.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by mandroids

It wasn’t 10/23, 12/28, 4/18, etc…it was 9/11.

One syllable and then three.


10/23 is one syllable and then three. And so is 12/28. Also, 1/11, 1/17, 1/21, 1/22, 1/23, 1/24, 1/25, 1/26, 1/28, 1/29, 1/31, 2/11, 2/17, and a whole host of other dates.

Also, even if "someone" did choose that specific date for it's numerical significance, why does that automatically mean it was an inside job? Maybe Osama bin Laden was mad at Western emergency operators.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by mandroids

Whoever was responsible for that dreadful day, I had an idea that made me think it was planned by those who know about modern societies need for easy catchphrases.


Nine eleven, as numbers, scan and read too well to be a mere horrible coincidence.

It wasn’t 10/23, 12/28, 4/18, etc…it was 9/11.

One syllable and then three. It scans in an easy to say and recall way.

It’s sinister, I believe preselected and easy to remember for a media friendly world.

Any opinions?


Certainly, here is my two cent on the date choice

9/11



Does not that look like the emergency 911 phone number

It is another subliminal implant in the global Matrix



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:06 PM
link   
But its the easy flowing nature of those particular numbers. yours didnt scan/read so well.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by CLPrime

Originally posted by mandroids

It wasn’t 10/23, 12/28, 4/18, etc…it was 9/11.

One syllable and then three.


10/23 is one syllable and then three. And so is 12/28. Also, 1/11, 1/17, 1/21, 1/22, 1/23, 1/24, 1/25, 1/26, 1/28, 1/29, 1/31, 2/11, 2/17, and a whole host of other dates.

Also, even if "someone" did choose that specific date for it's numerical significance, why does that automatically mean it was an inside job? Maybe Osama bin Laden was mad at Western emergency operators.


Just for the hell of it. What Calendar would Bin Laden and his followers have followed? There might be some significance there depending on the date I guess



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Glargod

Originally posted by mandroids

Whoever was responsible for that dreadful day, I had an idea that made me think it was planned by those who know about modern societies need for easy catchphrases.


Nine eleven, as numbers, scan and read too well to be a mere horrible coincidence.

It wasn’t 10/23, 12/28, 4/18, etc…it was 9/11.

One syllable and then three. It scans in an easy to say and recall way.

It’s sinister, I believe preselected and easy to remember for a media friendly world.

Any opinions?


Certainly, here is my two cent on the date choice

9/11



Does not that look like the emergency 911 phone number

It is another subliminal implant in the global Matrix



Well done!!



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:17 PM
link   
reply to post by mandroids
 


9/11 seems to read well because we've been subjected to "nine-eleven" for 10 years now. If it had happened 10 years ago on June 17, "six-seventeen" would seem to read well, too.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Glargod
 


In the Islamic calendar, September 11, 2001, was 23/6 (that is, 23 Jumādā ’l-Ākhira) of the year 1422.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by CLPrime
reply to post by mandroids
 


9/11 seems to read well because we've been subjected to "nine-eleven" for 10 years now. If it had happened 10 years ago on June 17, "six-seventeen" would seem to read well, too.



Hmm. no, nice try, but it doesnt ring true.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:32 PM
link   
2 26 93? any one know that date? no fair looking it up off the top of your head what happened on that day.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:35 PM
link   
reply to post by bekod
 


Two things happened: my mother was one day away from being 29, and the World Trade Center was bombed. That, I know not so much from the month/day, but from the year.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:37 PM
link   
Isn't it the American emergency number?
Surely there was a psychological intention, to make Americans remember the event every time they had to use the number?
It would only have worked on the American dating system. Otherwise they would have postponed it to the ninth of November to have the same effect.

Apologies- I see somebody got there first.
edit on 21-12-2011 by DISRAELI because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:38 PM
link   
reply to post by CLPrime
 
your one of the few that remember the first attack this was when the war on the US become know to a few, the rest is all history



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:51 PM
link   
reply to post by mandroids
 


What you are experiencing here is called denial. He is most certainly spot on. 9/11 has been conditioned to sound smooth over time. Attempting to hold on to anything else, would be deceiving logic..

I saw someone write this one time and it stuck.


There are ZERO "life points" for finding a conspiracy in everything



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 02:57 PM
link   
Coming from the UK, my first thought on that day was the coincidence that the date was the emergency number used in the USA.

Also weird was the term ground zero was being used within hours of the tragedy. Look up Ground Zero in an old dictionary.

Should add that the UK bombings are easy to remember as well 7/7
edit on 21-12-2011 by D8ncer because: (no reason given)

edit on 21-12-2011 by D8ncer because: (no reason given)

edit on 21-12-2011 by D8ncer because: Spelling terrible.

edit on 21-12-2011 by D8ncer because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 03:05 PM
link   
reply to post by D8ncer
 

And apparently the UK bombings were avowedly designed to be in a cross-shaped pattern centred on King's Cross.
The psychological approach again.



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 03:42 PM
link   
reply to post by bekod
 


My guess was the first WTC attack. Then I verified it. What was the signifigance of that day?



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 03:46 PM
link   

Originally posted by mandroids

Originally posted by CLPrime
reply to post by mandroids
 


9/11 seems to read well because we've been subjected to "nine-eleven" for 10 years now. If it had happened 10 years ago on June 17, "six-seventeen" would seem to read well, too.



Hmm. no, nice try, but it doesnt ring true.


Ohhh.... you have to have a "truth bell" to be certain I suppose.... lol... nice try indeed...



posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 06:41 PM
link   
reply to post by mandroids
 


It might be 9/11 in the US but in the UK it was 11/9. Does that have the same ring ?




top topics



 
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join