It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by kimish
reply to post by greyer
I've heard the same. In one verse in the KJV (not sure of which book it's located in) it mentions Jesus as the only begotten son and in every other version I've compared it to says that Jesus is the only son. Just the addition or subtraction of one word can mean a world of difference in this case the word begotten.edit on 17-12-2011 by kimish because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by greyer
reply to post by Blue_Jay33
Honestly, I have heard good about the King James version. Some of the versions they take words out.edit on 17-12-2011 by greyer because: (no reason given)
There is no evidence for that and you are just following a cult.
This has long been a pet peeve of mine how translators just decided to remove the name because they weren't sure enough how to pronounce it.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
reply to post by Blue_Jay33
There is no evidence for that and you are just following a cult.
This has long been a pet peeve of mine how translators just decided to remove the name because they weren't sure enough how to pronounce it.
No I am not wrong again, I am right again, as these bibles prove my point.
Originally posted by JibbyJedi
"More American than the King James version!"
And there is no controversy or questions about those names, is there?
So careful when you use that expression.
not get hung up on this sacred name garbage which I think is sending a lot of people to hell for idolatry which you are supporting with your personal little cult activity.