It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Kansas to Maryland via US 77 UFO Transpotation

page: 4
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in


posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 08:03 PM

Originally posted by NuclearPaulBy Australian standards, any load that wide must have a police escort and two pilot vehicles, one at the front and one at the rear. It could be a ten metre wide rubber dog poo and you would still need these.

You are not allowed to run oversize loads at night though. (There are exceptions where the load must go through populated areas such as the city and the load is that wide it would cause chaos during daytime traffic).

Any US truck drivers here that are familiar with OS regulations?
edit on 17/12/11 by NuclearPaul because: (no reason given)

I'm not a driver but am familiar to some of the requirements associated with transporting large loads.

Depending on why the load is considered oversized, transport can be mandated to occur at night.... Overheight loads generally don't have time-of-day restrictions as they don't impede adjacent lane traffic flow. Overwidth loads often are limited to off-peak traffic conditions so they can travel straddling lanes or have roads entirely blocked.
For instance, when Ronald Reagan's 707 "Air Force One" was being transported from the high-desert of California to the library for display, it was moved primarily at night due to the considerable traffic that occurs along I-15, I-10 and connected state routes / highways because of the considerable traffic caused by people commuting from the high-desert and other areas to Los Angeles, Simi Valley and surrounding areas.

edit on 12/21/2011 by abecedarian because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 08:13 PM

Originally posted by Tahnya86
reply to post by Dr UAE

Although i appreciate the diagram i would like to point out there are no folded wings nor wings present on the load and secondly in the OP image link there is no sign of landing gears, only a craft and tension straps, also, whos to say that even if the craft is interstella that they did not want a landing gear so the craft cand be stabalised while on the ground, rather then floating, mind you who knows how a ufo behaves when envioromental influences affect the crafts balace, my point being is just cause it has a landing gear does not mean its a drone, i have said over and over again, its could be desensitisation as well as a no other choice scenario of imediate priority transportation, and lastly, if no one who is related to the crafts and its transport says nothing, then there is no room to dig up clues, on pure speculation and that alone never confirms anything unless due evidence is provided or a leaked information scorce. its all upto us at ATS and the public to find out what where looking for, most inportantly "do your homework" meaning, do your research, dont just come on here and shout DRONE! LANDING GEAR!, Debunked, i appreciate your sugestions but trying to solve it the quickest is not the best answer to the subject in question, a broad mind and research is who you find what your really looking for.

Emphasis above added by me.... links to and says:

Finally, a man named Brooks McKinney stepped forward to pierce the veil of mystery and conspiracy. McKinney, senior manager of public relations at Northrop Grumman, told Life's Little Mysteries that the suspected UFO was in fact an X-47B, an unmanned combat drone designed to operate from aircraft carriers.

So, a comment from someone linked to the story. You say a broad mind should research should be done, and had you done some, you'd know you just went off for no reason.

posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 08:14 PM
reply to post by pikestaff

Have you ever seen the movie Flight of the navigator?

posted on Dec, 21 2011 @ 11:00 PM
reply to post by abecedarian

Not to mention their epic run-on sentence! Hahaha

new topics

top topics
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in