It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Kansas to Maryland via US 77 UFO Transpotation

page: 1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in


posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 03:40 AM
Recently we have seen another thread on a UFO on a flatbed in kentucky, but now we have one in Kansas, wether or not it is the same i do not know, but here we have a picture at night time heading down US 77 to maryland from kansas,Kansas is not to far from Rowell and Holoman AFB, and Holoman AFB has had its fare share of UFO conspiraceys, Now when you search Maryland Millitary base USA in Google earth a phenominal amount of millitary installations show up such as:

US Navy department
US Air force
US Army Research Lab department
US Marine corpse recruiting
US Air National guard
Fort detrick
And of corse Washington.

Fort detrick is renowned for Biological diseases and has been rumored to surface such deseases like HIV,Anthrax and abnormal cancer rates,Although no information upon research can find anything linked to UFO Craft Washington has had sightings.

Back to the main subject, Assuming this Craft May not be linked to the other two ATS articles and sightings thins would lead one to conme to this potentially mapping,Oring and destination, This craft could have came from holoman AFB, Traveled Along any of the State highways of taken a quiter large road away from the desity of civilian trafic and headed up to US 77, the number of roads avalable are a wide aray.

So in conclusion This craft has came from Holoman nd was heading to Washington somewhere, people are saying these are drones but this one at the provided link does appear to be different and fits the classic UFO craft shape, even if these craft have landing wheels it does not automatically cancel out it being a UFO and is a drone, and this one does not have landing gears, the yellow things on either side are tension straps which are commonly used for truck loads to reduce flexing and increase load stability,whos to say they have not opted to put landing gears due to the fact when genrally UFO Craft when powered down lose height due to the reduced electrical current, trust me iv done my research.

The option to transport at night time reduces civilian witnesses and trafic density and before you say "they wouldnt transport it in public" you have to remember that firstly the craft could be broken down and not opperatible and this was the only mode of transportation and secondly people can speculate and ask as many questions as they link but if you dont say anything at all, then nothing can be assumed by comments provided relating to the question in subject wich ofcorse only leaves speculation in the minds and mouths of those questioning the subject of parties in question, i belive one Millitary information source said one craft seen was a drone, well atleast im sure i saw such mentioning, but also after some had already assumed it was, so why not tell the public something they have already mentioned, this gives those questiong braging rites and creates a smoke screen relating to the original topic in question "in this case original assumption being a UFO", sort of how chinese whispers works.

I think this needs to be taken more serriousley and more witnesses need to come forth rather then shouting the typical "no this cant be true and go with the least likely option" and actually think about the geographics and millitary installations in surounding areas and their history as this will help give a more definitive answer, unfortunantly in this photo no number plate is identifiable.

also i have provided a link to Latest ufo sightings on the sighting and some opinions :Latest ufo sightings
edit on 19/01/2011 by Tahnya86 because: Added link

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 03:58 AM
reply to post by Tahnya86

For sure, this is not a bird!

edit on 17-12-2011 by Arken because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 04:07 AM

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 04:08 AM
I would bet that item is a prop for some film, wait a couple of years, and we will see it, probably a drone from an interstellar mother ship type scenario.too small for interstellar travel in my opinion.

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 04:23 AM
reply to post by Tahnya86

Few nights back, sounds of large explosions in Kansas, now this Lockheed Martin experimental a/c hauled.

There sure ain't anything boring going on in Kansas, or what you say Dorothy?

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 04:44 AM
reply to post by litterbaux

no need for insults, as i said, there could be reasons, id sugest having a open mind, it cou;d be desensitisation pf the ufo genre to the public.

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 04:51 AM
reply to post by litterbaux

First of all, You CANT USE these words.
Second: You know Military highways for this "Over size Load" kind of transoprt?

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 04:52 AM
It would appear to be a variant of the drone we lost in Iran that was seen in the video for Ponca City, Oklahoma. I'd found another site discussing it and took a closer look and sure enough, the wheel configuration is the same for the X-47B Drone...which is basically a Navy prototype/variant. A few of the online photos shows it with wings on Aircraft Carriers. That is quite a public way to transport it though. Wow.....

Why not though, when you think about it. Before Iran made it a public image, who would believe that is what they were looking at? It would just be assumed it'd be a prop or a mock up. Surely, they'd never transport a top secret drone in full view on a public we can see they did.

Other angles for Ponca City 'UFO' drone and drone stat chart

Google Gallery of the drone in more recognizable settings

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 04:54 AM
reply to post by Arken

Thank you arkin, and i second arkins post litterbaux, do you know of any? or are you some kind ***** as you called me? mister know it all.

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 05:21 AM
Very interesting photo op.
It reminds me of this a couple of years ago

Back to the photo,
I wonder if they went through
that McDonalds drive thru?

You'd need an alien's digestive system to
break that sh!t down

edit on 17-12-2011 by LeLeu because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 05:29 AM
How can it be a UFO, when it's not flying

Just a military, no secret, transportation.

Wait a second, i get it now.

Unidentified on a Flatbed Object.

edit on 17-12-2011 by Mianeye because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 05:38 AM
I have no idea if the object we are seeing is legit or not, but, to those who think that people are questioning crazy, what better way to do it than in plain sight?

People would have the thought process like 'they would never, it has to be a prop' or they wouldn't let us see it if it were real'.

Does anyone know? No. But saying they wouldn't transport it like this is just plain ignorance. They have been flying classified planes around cities in plain view for sometime now.

If it was a prop it would be constructed on site IMO, on a sound stage in Hollywood where they can put it anywhere and in any scene they like. I couldn't see them hauling it around to film at certain locations.


posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 06:34 AM
We can hardly investigate or question anything these days on ATS without being ridiculed for it.. i mean.. isn't this what ATS is suppose to be about?

All these negative attitudes need to be warned and then banned.

Now, i think there are several things we could and should question..

If this is military than it's obviously not anything that is official, for sure secret. That in itself is news worthy.

I could see the whole "public desensitization" thing going on also. Especially with numerous photos from different locations in public areas. That is also worth investigating.

It's pretty interesting. Now, personally, i do not believe this is ET in anyway..besides the basis of the shape.

That video a few posts up in pretty interesting, those shapes look pretty "saucer-y" to me! anyone know what came of that video? any explanation?

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 06:43 AM
how will this one look like if you cover it and put it on a truck ?

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 06:43 AM
It's a UFO. Sorry, but, umm, Let's see, Vegas, Russia, Kansas, and wherever else, they all look the same. Different parts of the county. I don't see why they don't just fly the thing, Typical they would rather waste gas.
edit on 17-12-2011 by Manhater because: (no reason given)

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 06:53 AM

Originally posted by litterbaux
If you think the military is using civilian roadways to transport alien technology you are either stupid or retarded.

second line.

Why not ? They can if they want, that's it.

By the way, most of us do not tolerate insults here. For that reason I have to report you.

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 06:59 AM

Originally posted by Manhater
It's a UFO. Sorry, but, umm, Let's see, Vegas, Russia, Kansas, and wherever else, they all look the same. Different parts of the county. I don't see why they don't just fly the thing, Typical they would rather waste gas.
edit on 17-12-2011 by Manhater because: (no reason given)

It could be intentional, maybe one of the steps of "Blue Beam".

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 07:33 AM
reply to post by dannotz

You may notice that in the second video post from Arken, it describes the convoy as
being escorted by a state trooper and an unknown black truck. This also closely
describes the video I posted.

The "craft" in the video Arken posted clearly seems to have landing gear.
It could well be something similar to what Dr UAE suggests.


posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 07:41 AM
If this is some kind of super secret UFO they are doing an amazingly poor job of keeping it secret. You would expect at least a full military escort or a large box to put it in.

posted on Dec, 17 2011 @ 07:44 AM
reply to post by Manhater

Some how I think transporting it on a flatbed is less costly than flying it....

new topics

top topics

<<   2  3  4 >>

log in