It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ConspiracyTruth
reply to post by MegaMind
Would still love someone to chime in on the "WAIVER" part - does this mean, given certain conditions, the president would authorize military NOT to detain someone, or that the president could just ignore these rules entirely for the sake of national security and detain anyone?
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by anakark
No there isn't.
And it's supported in the Constitution and applicable law.
If you give material support to enemy forces, or engage in combat against the US military, your citizenship won't protect you.
Originally posted by projectvxn
reply to post by LittleBlackEagle
It hasn't been challenged in SCOTUS yet.
It may be considering all the hooplah.
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Lately, I have been seeing many claims from all over the place. Claims that the US will be able to detain US Citizens indefinitely, with out a trial. This is a very scary though and I admit, I fell for it. It sounded true. After all, the US seems to be passing more and more questionable bills every day now.
Well, I got to thinking that I never once actually saw the part in this bill, stating that US citizens could be detained indefinitely. So I did some research and read through the bill.
Take a look at what the bill really in section 1032 entitled "Requirement For Military Custody"
(b) Applicability to United States Citizens and Lawful Resident Aliens-
(1) UNITED STATES CITIZENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.
(2) LAWFUL RESIDENT ALIENS- The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to a lawful resident alien of the United States on the basis of conduct taking place within the United States, except to the extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States.
Section 1032
So clearly you can all now see, neither US citizen or Lawful Resident Alien can be detained indefinitely. What we have been seeing and hearing, is a lie being perpetrated by media and citizen alike. Some intentionally, some unintentionally.
But I hope you can all now see, that for once, our rights are not being trampled and that the truth is, US citizens cannot be detained indefinitely with out a trial.
S.1867
ETA: I must admit that after participating in this thread, there has been great debate and I eventually conceded that though it is very unlikely, it is in fact, possible, for US citizens to be detained indefinitely, given the correct circumstances.
Thanks to everyone for helping out, putting up with my questions and clearing up a few confusions I was having.edit on 15-12-2011 by gimme_some_truth because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by LittleBlackEagle
indeed it would, although i wouldn't call it hooplah when an entire nation of people suddenly find themselves possible targets of their own military for the first time.
Originally posted by FurvusRexCaeli
Originally posted by LittleBlackEagle
indeed it would, although i wouldn't call it hooplah when an entire nation of people suddenly find themselves possible targets of their own military for the first time.
"Suddenly?" This has been law for over ten years. Surely you've heard of Jose Padilla, Yaser Esam Hamdi, or at least Anwar al-Awlaki. This is absolutely hooplah, based on fundamental misunderstandings of long-standing national defense policy, the government's Constitutional powers, landmark Supreme Court cases, and the actual effect of the FY2012 NDAA (which does nothing more than establish a Congressional oversight mechanism for the Executive Branch's secretive AUMF "determination" process).