It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jeenyus2008
Phobos is one of Jupiter's moons. Not sure if you were inferring that it belonged to Mars, or that you were talking about space exploration in general. As for the idea... I don't know. I doubt it though. What makes you think were any more organized out in space than we are here. We cant even keep a drone from crashing (hate to bring that up in discussion), let alone take manned missions to other planets and back.. But again it is plausible, and just my take on it.
Originally posted by jeenyus2008
Phobos is one of Jupiter's moons. Not sure if you were inferring that it belonged to Mars, or that you were talking about space exploration in general. As for the idea... I don't know. I doubt it though. What makes you think were any more organized out in space than we are here. We cant even keep a drone from crashing (hate to bring that up in discussion), let alone take manned missions to other planets and back.. But again it is plausible, and just my take on it.
Originally posted by deadbang
reply to post by jeenyus2008
Jenny, actually Phobos is a moon/satellite of Mars, OP is correct in that.
As far as have we been there? It would not surprise me in the least, if you listen to John Lear the answer for Mars would be yes as well as quite a few other destinations.
Originally posted by Illustronic
reply to post by jeenyus2008
Saturn has a moon named Phoebe, that may be what caused some confusion.
Originally posted by mandroids
Originally posted by Illustronic
reply to post by jeenyus2008
Saturn has a moon named Phoebe, that may be what caused some confusion.
AWWW, very friendly of you....
And your opinion on the thread question?
Originally posted by Illustronic
Absolutely not! A year and a half of travel with marginal radiation shielding means its not technologically survivable as yet. This is one of the primary functions of the ISS, to research and study radiation shielding in the relatively safe confines of LEO. We don't yet have the technology to make that trip, and nobody is 'hiding' it either. We went to the moon because it was at most a two week mission(s), not a two year mission.
Originally posted by Freelancer
Originally posted by Illustronic
Absolutely not! A year and a half of travel with marginal radiation shielding means its not technologically survivable as yet. This is one of the primary functions of the ISS, to research and study radiation shielding in the relatively safe confines of LEO. We don't yet have the technology to make that trip, and nobody is 'hiding' it either. We went to the moon because it was at most a two week mission(s), not a two year mission.
Are you sure we don't already posses the technology and that this technology is not being "hidden"?
While there are countless books that speak of such technology there is one that I know of that has done some extensive research into this very area.
Have you read Paul LaViolette's book Secrets of Anti-gravity Propulsion?. Thomas Townsend Brown's work in the 1950's on his Electrogravitic Propulsion was years ahead of it's time. Also in the book LaViolette investigates how the US Air Force B-2 Spirit stealth bomber's highly classified propulsion system works.