It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by stuncrazy
reply to post by dadgad
I'll refrain from being a dbag. you give entirely too much credit to corporations and not nearly enough to the people. I could have told you that Obama was simply an extension of G dubs 3rd term. Everything that sent our country into a death spiral your man Obama continued. War in Afghan, Iraq. Guantanamo, and to top it off he bailed out big money.
Ron Paul is the man for many reasons, but mainly because he kills the problem at it's root. I will be the first to admit that i have healthy skepticism about the man, but mostly because i never trust anything until it comes true. to be against Ron Paul is simply un-American. He stands for everything the constitution does. if you think it's the governments job to make your life better... well then.... grow a pair and figure out what it is YOU'RE not doing to make it better. I'm sick of this "someone has to take care of me" crap. that is not and never has been what the American dream was about.
Originally posted by DelMarvel
Originally posted by dadgad
What Paul desires simply won't happen. First of all, the corporate power scheme is way to powerful and concentrated. Secondly he would actually help them, since he wants to hand out everything to the market.
Competition won't solve anything. They will win. They always win.
You hit the nail on the head with that as well as the comments about threats to our existence as the result of rapid technological advances that can only be addressed by global organization. Libertarianism might have worked when we were mostly all small farmers with a seemingly limitless frontier but it doesn't work for a large industrialized nation. The fact is that we had a system much closer to Libertarianism a hundred years ago and it didn't work. Without government regulation of big business we wound up with the power concentrated in the hands of a few oligarchs with many negative results for everyone else.
On a separate note, in my book red flags go up anytime someone starts in with the "if you don't believe in my candidate you're a traitor or un-American" even if I do agree with parts of their platform.
Originally posted by therealdemoboy
reply to post by dadgad
We are in this mess because we aren't following the current model. This is what Dr. Paul is suggesting. Follow the Constitution, and respect the rule of law. You wouldn't have the same inflation-created bubbles, and you wouldn't have corporate big-wigs making a few extra billions thanks to unconstitutional legal protections.
There isn't a better system on paper than ours. We just have to allow the "chains of the constitution" to once again bind the federal government, and then have the states follow suit.
Originally posted by ADVISOR
Some one mentioned that tptb would kill off Ron Paul, I recall it being said Obama too would be assassinated and he is still around.
Other than that I hope such never happens, as it would be just plain asinine
Originally posted by dadgad
Originally posted by stuncrazy
reply to post by dadgad
I'll refrain from being a dbag. you give entirely too much credit to corporations and not nearly enough to the people. I could have told you that Obama was simply an extension of G dubs 3rd term. Everything that sent our country into a death spiral your man Obama continued. War in Afghan, Iraq. Guantanamo, and to top it off he bailed out big money.
Ron Paul is the man for many reasons, but mainly because he kills the problem at it's root. I will be the first to admit that i have healthy skepticism about the man, but mostly because i never trust anything until it comes true. to be against Ron Paul is simply un-American. He stands for everything the constitution does. if you think it's the governments job to make your life better... well then.... grow a pair and figure out what it is YOU'RE not doing to make it better. I'm sick of this "someone has to take care of me" crap. that is not and never has been what the American dream was about.
As I mentioned before in this thread, I acknowledge the fact that he(Obama) has not kept many of his promises. But on the other hand, the situation is on every level very complex and I don't expect one man to be able to fix this and certainly not within this system. Personally, I myself wouldn't know what to do about those wars. You see, it's very easy to say let's go home. I mean, after you completely destroy a nation it seems to easy a way out to me. Way to easy. (of course the premise should be to leave, don't get me wrong)
In any case. Phrases such as being against Ron Paul is equal to being un-American don't work on me, that kind emotional black-male is really immature(no offence). It destroys every opportunity for intelligent and open discussion, you should know better.
You see it is so easy to say government is bad, we don't need anybody to take care of us and all that liberal talk. But it simply isn't true. We very much need governing. We need regulations, control, limitations and all that. Otherwise things don't work. If you say we need no government, the market will solve everything you are really laying your trust into private hands. I mean that is exactly what got us here. Private corporations doing whatever they felt like.edit on 13-12-2011 by dadgad because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by korathin
Originally posted by dadgad
Originally posted by stuncrazy
reply to post by dadgad
I'll refrain from being a dbag. you give entirely too much credit to corporations and not nearly enough to the people. I could have told you that Obama was simply an extension of G dubs 3rd term. Everything that sent our country into a death spiral your man Obama continued. War in Afghan, Iraq. Guantanamo, and to top it off he bailed out big money.
Ron Paul is the man for many reasons, but mainly because he kills the problem at it's root. I will be the first to admit that i have healthy skepticism about the man, but mostly because i never trust anything until it comes true. to be against Ron Paul is simply un-American. He stands for everything the constitution does. if you think it's the governments job to make your life better... well then.... grow a pair and figure out what it is YOU'RE not doing to make it better. I'm sick of this "someone has to take care of me" crap. that is not and never has been what the American dream was about.
As I mentioned before in this thread, I acknowledge the fact that he(Obama) has not kept many of his promises. But on the other hand, the situation is on every level very complex and I don't expect one man to be able to fix this and certainly not within this system. Personally, I myself wouldn't know what to do about those wars. You see, it's very easy to say let's go home. I mean, after you completely destroy a nation it seems to easy a way out to me. Way to easy. (of course the premise should be to leave, don't get me wrong)
In any case. Phrases such as being against Ron Paul is equal to being un-American don't work on me, that kind emotional black-male is really immature(no offence). It destroys every opportunity for intelligent and open discussion, you should know better.
You see it is so easy to say government is bad, we don't need anybody to take care of us and all that liberal talk. But it simply isn't true. We very much need governing. We need regulations, control, limitations and all that. Otherwise things don't work. If you say we need no government, the market will solve everything you are really laying your trust into private hands. I mean that is exactly what got us here. Private corporations doing whatever they felt like.edit on 13-12-2011 by dadgad because: (no reason given)
Carrying the water for Obama destroys any chance of a real conversation as well. But based upon your reply, from a political stand point, your next to Lenin while the rest of us are between George Washington and Jefferson. Hence why many are quick to state things like "un-american".
In the interest's of fair conversations: Are you or anyone you know accepting welfare or disability?
I suggest one look up the style of government sociopaths tend to prefer. Because 1) It isn't "us" who need regulation. Regulations are akin to criminal laws for businesses. And 2) We don't need limitations. We are perfectly capable of making our own choices.
Originally posted by charlyv
I believe his popularity is going viral. This is really cool to witness. Last time this kind of thing happened, it was JFK.
(Yea, I am that old!)
Originally posted by apacheman
My question is:
If Ron Paul is so good, why is he still a Republican and not an Independent or Libertarian?
If he's as smart as everyone thinks, he must know that by running as a Republican whatever his agenda or message is, it will be subsumed into the party's goals.
One guy isn't going to change the party, even if he were elected President.
As it is, he's nearly an outcast from his own party and stands zero chance of winning the nomination, or of getting genuine support if he does.
Strikes me he's just theater and he knows it, otherwise he'd be doing something braver and be more independent of the GOP. But being affiliated does have cash value, I suppose.
Originally posted by DelMarvel
Originally posted by charlyv
I believe his popularity is going viral. This is really cool to witness. Last time this kind of thing happened, it was JFK.
(Yea, I am that old!)
I think George Wallace is probably a better example.
Originally posted by ADVISOR
Some one mentioned that tptb would kill off Ron Paul, I recall it being said Obama too would be assassinated and he is still around.
Other than that I hope such never happens, as it would be just plain asinine
Truely if Ron makes it as president, I would volunteer to be his secret service back man with out pay, as it would be an honor to serve one of America's greatest statesmen since our founding fathers.
I would consider such to be ever a higher honor than my honorable discharge or being a member of the Order of Combat Spur or golden spur.
I would gladly take a bullet and give my life for such a leader as Ron Paul.edit on 12-12-2011 by ADVISOR because: added clarification
Originally posted by conspiracytheoristIAM
Unfortunately, I agree that if Ron Paul were to be elected President his chance for longevity would be slim. In his immediate future there would be a plane crash ,a car wreck , or a sudden illness. Ron Paul is the only chance for America to free itself from the burgeoning strangle hold of the NWO. That's why Ron Paul has been belittled and ignored by the MSM.
As far as a vice-president, I'd hope to see someone younger, such as Paul Ryan .
as a footnote: Were Ron Paul to become President Ron Paul, as MOST of us would like, how long until they kill him off?