It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by greenCo
Originally posted by InfaRedMan
reply to post by beezzer
Sadly, if you have losers for parents, the probability is low that you will be too much different.
IRM
Losers being human beings unable to make money from profitable professions? Perhaps the western point of view about losers is not the same in the entire world/human species. Beware to put random labels on valuable people that you really don´t know.
Originally posted by Spiramirabilis
reply to post by InfaRedMan
there are many kinds of losers in this world - aren't there IRM?
I don't think that it is genetic. It is a learned behaviour, though. Parents teach their children smply by living their lives the way that they do.
en.wikipedia.org...
Learned helplessness, as a technical term in animal psychology and related human psychology, means a condition of a human person or an animal in which it has learned to behave helplessly, even when the opportunity is restored for it to help itself by avoiding an unpleasant or harmful circumstance to which it has been subjected. Learned helplessness theory is the view that clinical depression and related mental illnesses may result from a perceived absence of control over the outcome of a situation.[1]
Originally posted by Blaine91555It IS due to environment. The better the environment you are raised in the better your chances. Perhaps that is what he truly meant?
The answer is also not found in that sort of response. The answer lies in education and exposure to different idea's. The inner cities are crawling with people who would and could be geniuses and holders of high Degree's given the right environment and opportunity.
What I don't understand is this constant need to categorize. I don't know this guys' politics, but I'd bet that he's a progressive democrat.
Originally posted by TXRabbit
This argument could go on for days.
Food for thought though. I live in a part of Texas that saw a large influx of Katrina victims (tm) coming from NOLA. Most of them were given places to live while they collected their "assistance" checks. Most of them are still here.
Originally posted by beezzer
I don't know this guys' politics, but I'd bet that he's a progressive democrat.
Originally posted by beezzer
I honestly think that morons like this guy deliberately state these things to illicite responses that would further push their own ideologies.
Originally posted by paratus
reply to post by starwarsisreal
I believe it ALL, subsidize anything and it will snowball.
Look at the stats, you cannot discredit him, he's stating FACT.
Deny ignorance.
Too many sucklers... Not enough working taxpayers to "subsidize" the herd...
Originally posted by SavedOne
Originally posted by TXRabbit
This argument could go on for days.
Food for thought though. I live in a part of Texas that saw a large influx of Katrina victims (tm) coming from NOLA. Most of them were given places to live while they collected their "assistance" checks. Most of them are still here.
I've done a lot of volunteer work for Hearts and Hammers. We spend one day trying to get as much done on a house as we can, it's a full day of ant-hill type activity, really crazy. I've never once seen a homeowner lift a finger to help on their own house, they remain inside the house, usually with the shades drawn. You'd be surprised how much we sometimes have to bang on the door just to get them to plug an extension cord in (those older homes never have outlets outside). Often their adult children will stand in the street with their friends watching the progress, but doing nothing themselves. As one of the mentors I would frequently get questions about why the residents aren't helping out, and usually there was a lot of anger attached to the question. My response was always "you have to consider that we're doing this to improve the entire community, it's not about a particular person or family." I'm not mad/ bitter or anything, just stating how it is/ was. I still think it's a worthwhile effort. Do I agree with the OP article comment that these people are a separate subspecies? Well no, I'm convinced that anyone brought up in the proper environment can rise above. As an example, we have friends that adopted a girl from a horribly impoverished village in South America. These are people that grow their own food and wash their clothes in creeks. They would fall firmly in the "subspecies" category described in the article. Yet this girl was brought to America at a young age and brought up by loving, middle-class parents. She is now an accomplished violinist and constantly ranks near the top of her class in school. Perhaps if the Harvard mathematician in the OP came down from his ivory tower once in a while he'd realize how much brainpower is being wasted because people want to write off this "subculture" as worthless without a second thought.