Originally posted by DJW001
You forgot to mention that many of these "anomalies" only turn up on Google! The images on GoogleMoon, GoogleMars, and GoogleSky are stitched together, which causes imperfections in the image.

.......................................................................................................................
DJW001, you are exactly right. I found that out the hard way because Google Mars was all that I knew to look at to begin with. However, as we all do, I have learned a lot about using good original images as much as possible for Mars anomaly research.

However, I would say Google Mars is still a useful and interesting tool to use for just looking around. A great thing about Google Mars is that it does also include "surface access" to the actual Mars Orbiter photographs. To have the links to the NASA MOC photos displayed on the Mars globe surface, you must put a checkmark for "Spacecraft Imagery". The "checkbox" is in the lower part of the menu on the left side of the Google Mars window. You can even choose which MOC camera(s) you want displayed, if not all.

There are other ways to get these photos, outside of Google Mars. But, when searching on Google Mars, and you find something interesting, you can go directly to the higher resolution MOC photos, right there, and get pics of that area for your review and research..

So, I suggest that we do not dismiss Google Mars completely, because it is also an "on-the-spot resource for linking to the NASA higher resolution photos!

....but even on the high resolution photos the moon lander still looks like like a rock.
Show it to random people completely unaware of what it is and they quite likely will say ROCK!

I went a step further and saved it in case it disappears from that page. It's very informative.

Originally posted by silversurfer6161
....but even on the high resolution photos the moon lander still looks like like a rock.
Show it to random people completely unaware of what it is and they quite likely will say ROCK!

They could have been added in digitally:






....Afterall, no other countries have shown us pictures of the landers. Anyone who says otherwise is being dishonest. Only American probes can see the American landers.

Originally posted by Illustronic

No other country has taken photos within 10x the resolution as the LROC could be why there skippy.

So you must also agree that if the Moon missions were hoaxed, the Soviets would have been unable to blow the whistle - as they lacked the images to prove we didn't go.

---

---

Originally posted by DJW001
They don't need photographs of the lunar surface to "blow the whistle;" just some covertly taken "back stage" photos, some stolen documents, a hidden tape recording, etc, etc. You know, all the easily attainable HumInt that no Moon Hoaxer has ever managed to find.

And if they found such things and managed to buy time on one of the networks, we would have called them a bunch of liars and laughed at their failed attempt to subvert our glorious achievement.

Then we would have watched a Cronkite special follow-up report further destroy their pathetic attempts at undermining the triumph of their betters.

Communist Scum. There is no low they won't stoop to.

---

---

Originally posted by elevenaugust
However, it doesn't seems to matter, as we regularly sees, here and elsewhere, common things in these high-resolution photos that appears to some people to be extraordinary or artificial things, simply because they don't look at the original hi-resolution picture, but at some low resolution that shade off natural artifacts in landscapes.

Hmmmm I see what your getting at Would you like to see my collection of Alien spacecraft on Mars? I have a lot of them... too many to put in one post but I can pick a few good ones. And these are absolutely not rocks. I know because I checked

Spaceships on Mars

















Now anyone that tries to convince me that these are only rocks is either embracing ignorance or is blind