It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by camaro68ss
I really dont know who to blame here. the woman, knowing shes prego and going to a OWS in seattle knowing it could get crazy
Can the government place any restrictions on the use of a public forum? Yes. Depending on the specific public location and the government’s interest in ensuring safety and order, restrictions governing the use of public property for assembly and protest may apply. The following are some locations-specific regulations to consider when planning protest activities. Public sidewalks: Demonstrating groups should leave rooms for passer-by and should not block the flow of pedestrian traffic. If leafleting, demonstrators should not force passerby to accept leaflets or harass individuals who refuse leaflets. Public Streets: Any march on the public street is typically considered a parade; therefore the location, time and duration of the march are subject to regulation by the city officials to prevent traffic problems. Marchers may be expected to obey traffic laws (such as red light) during the march. Lobbies of public buildings: It is more difficult to obtain access to the inside of a public building than it is to obtain access to a street or sidewalk outside. However, if some nongovernment- sponsored expressive activities are permitted in the lobby, then similar activities by others may not be prohibited based on he content of the expression. But if no activities are permitted, then it is unlikely that a rally or demonstration would be allowed inside.
Originally posted by PrimalRed
Originally posted by AnonymousVan
I wouldn't let my pregnant wife got to an occupy protest.
Excuse me, not to sound rude, but womens have rights.
The police have to protects its citizens, , even the protesters
Oh i know women have rights but to say this is murder of an unborn child is also to say that the mother has the right to put her child in harms way so long as it politically aligns with what she wants. To say that the cops murdered anyone in this event is also to call the mother an accessory, you can't have it both ways.
Originally posted by juleol
Originally posted by PrimalRed
Originally posted by AnonymousVan
I wouldn't let my pregnant wife got to an occupy protest.
Excuse me, not to sound rude, but womens have rights.
The police have to protects its citizens, , even the protesters
Oh i know women have rights but to say this is murder of an unborn child is also to say that the mother has the right to put her child in harms way so long as it politically aligns with what she wants. To say that the cops murdered anyone in this event is also to call the mother an accessory, you can't have it both ways.
She was already homeless thanks to the system she protested against. The child would have either grown up on streets or taken by child services and abused. I don't think this female had much choice... This was a desperate attempt to get word out so that her unborn child could have a future.
And not everyone realize that they live in a corrupt system where police actually kicks and spray innocent civilians even when they are pregnant.
These pigs know what they are doing.