Let's kill the Pentagon Missile attack once and for all., page 13

Originally posted by piboy
There is only one way to kill this once and for all: there must be evidence that supports only one explanation.

Early in this thread I thought we had established that there is no evidence that it actually was flight 77 hit the Pentagon. There is only evidence that some craft hit the pentagon (read the earlier posts if you don't understand why).

We discussed the problems with the eye witnesses and that the proper way to use eye-witness accounts is to have them state in their own words exactly what they saw. No paraphrasing by the news, no "my brother-in-law saw the whole thing."

What we need is video evidence, photo evidence, hard evidence (actual airplane parts) to show that it only could have been flight 77 and nothing else.

Otherwise we continue to go around in circles where everyone uses the inconclusive evidence to try to prove their own theories. And the evidence we have is consistent with both flight 77 and something else hitting the Pentagon.

Inconsistencies are not evidence. Simulations are not evidence. "Eye-witness" accounts from news reports are not evidence. Explantions by the government and\or experts are not evidence.

We need evidence to put this thing to rest. All other investigations of disasters like this have thorough and meticulous procedures to produce evidence that only supports one explanation (or at least they try to get to that point).

I quoted this post because I think is very centered and gets to the point of the thread.

So HERE I GO WITH SOME OTHER THINGS TO CONSIDER:

2 Years ago I was Banned for asking the same questions I am going to ask I hope somebody can answer them with REAL FACTS and not just childish answers and corny plots.

A 757 is a real big plane its considered a "heavy" the Heavy Jets start with the 757 the 767 the 747 and the 777 (boeing ones). The FAA made some mistakes when the 757 entered service because it weights 12 tons more than a 727 fully loaded, so they tought the 757 would not induce wake turbulence, after 3 accidents the 757 was cosidered a "heavy" due to wake turbulence and size.

There has been some incidents on ..that planes crash with unmovable objects at high speed, guess what the wreckage is amazing, no stupid, idiotic, fantastic and plain unexplainable vaporization here is a picture of such incident:

This airplane crashed with a mountain at 320 knots ( I guess the mountain is a Little bit harder to crack than the pentagon!) see the pic, also the AMERICAN AIRLINES that crashed at Lima Peru (again with a mountain) has some of it parts INTACT.

To put a nice end to thi spart of my argument I was at a wreckage of Mexicana flight 930 in 1986 the 727 came down almosyt supersonically and guess what the tail was very much complete and the engines charred but recognizable, the plane had fuel and made a huge explotion.

That brings me to the "problem" with a 757 hitting the pentagon here are the "holes" to the official story.

*I am an Airline fan, quite knowledgeable in this field

1) In the photo of the ONLY remains of the craft with colors there is no blue color ALL THE PARTS OF PAINT IN RED OD AA 757 have the red stripe flush with blue and the silver color of the skin. NO BLUE? EXPLAIN THAT.
2) The Fan blades of the Rb (rolls royce) engines are made of titanium and are very sturdy yet the photo of the "engine" has only the "center" PRESUMED TO BE and doesnt have any blade and worse the main stage compresor and the shafts where are they?
To me that photo looks like an air ram jet engine that almost always propels missiles and or drones (very cheap, reliable and made to be used once)
3)The 757 is a big Sucker and was not traveling at 500mph, its imposible to fly at that speed close to the ground, the wings would be torn appart. So Its quite posible it was traveling at 250-270 Knots and even at that speed its quite a feat to travel so close to the ground, even a skilled pilot may not do it without crashing first or skiding, an amateur pilot highjaker IMPOSIBLE.
4)The wings and the engines (I have stablished those are quite sturdy parts) must have made some impacta to the sides of the "entrane" hole of the fuselage, see the large pics that is not the case, you can even see the cars parked and burned but almost clean, no debris no engines and NO HIT TO THE BUILDING , The Rb 211-535 is by turbofan engines quite heavy and the main fuel tanks in the 757 are in the wing so THERE SHOULD be AT least 2 holes to the sides of the main hit hole.
THE MAIN THING YOU MUST EXPLIN IS THIS ONE....

Ojk you say a 767 fully loaded with fuel crash the twin tower south the plane was going at 310 knots the 767-200 weights quite a lot more than the 757 and it entered the building ( A BUILDING CONSIDERABILY LESS STURDY THAN THE PENTAGON) and guess what it penetrated it and exploded ...now the 757 pierced trough some 8 to 10 walls of the pentagon disintegrating to oblivion in the process.....

So a big one crashes a normal building (with large open spaces inside -if you had been there) and disintegrates, a smaller one with less fuel goes cleanly (see prevoius post photos) through 8-10 reinforced walls.

Some other things to ponder about. NO MAGAZINE like Airliners, Airways or major one dealing with planes has made ANY comment on this inconsistencies.
With the data has become secret and withheld from public?

Something struck the pentagon that morning but a 757 IN MY DREAMS.....NO WAY

Here is the 757 in question .......