It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by IEtherianSoul9
reply to post by lonewolf19792000
What evidence is there supporting your claim that Hebrews were enslaved by the ancient Egyptians?
Are there any sources you have?
Originally posted by IEtherianSoul9
Here is a map of Egypt and Sudan for reference:
"They (the Ethiopians) say also that the Egyptians are colonists sent out by the Ethiopians, Osiris ["King of Kings and God of Gods] having been the leader of the colony. Diodorus devoted an entire chapter of his world history, the Bibliotheke Historica, or Library of History (Book 3), to the Ku#es ["Aithiopians"] of Meroe. Here he repeats the story of their great piety, their high favor with the gods, and adds the fascinating legend that they were the first of all men created by the gods and were the founders of Egyptian civilization, invented writing, and given the Egyptians their religion and culture.
Originally posted by LUXUS3 Genetic testing on the bones found in the tomb of the pyramid builders has shown that they are the ancestors of modern Egyptians, not Nubians.
4 Ramses II was a fair skinned man as confirmed by testing of his hair, he had pail skin and red hair btw
5 Genetic testing has shown that the number of Nubians in lower Egypt increased only after the downfall of Egypt, proving that they could not have built it i.e. they were the minority not the majority![/QUOTE]
FALSE! This peer reviewed study be actually confirms that Nubians were a better representation of early ancient Egyptians than Late Dynastic Egyptians were, BECAUSE those Late Dynastic Egyptians experienced significant admixture with invading and migrant Mediterranean populations. HENCE the ancient Egyptians originally LACKED biological affinities with Mediterranean populations, but rather had affinities with more southerly Northeast African populations:
"The question of the genetic origins of ancient Egyptians, particularly those during the Dynastic period, is relevant to the current study. Modern interpretations of Egyptian state formation propose an indigenous origin of the Dynastic civilization (Hassan, 1988). Early Egyptologists considered Upper and Lower Egyptians to be genetically distinct populations, and viewed the Dynastic period as characterized by a conquest of Upper Egypt by the Lower Egyptians. More recent interpretations contend that Egyptians from the south actually expanded into the northern regions during the Dynastic state unification (Hassan, 1988; Savage, 2001), and that the Predynastic populations of Upper and Lower Egypt are morphologically distinct from one another, but not sufficiently distinct to consider either non-indigenous (Zakrzewski, 2007). The Predynastic populations studied here, from Naqada and Badari, are both Upper Egyptian samples, while the Dynastic Egyptian sample (Tarkhan) is from Lower Egypt. The Dynastic Nubian sample is from Upper Nubia (Kerma). Previous analyses of cranial variation found the Badari and Early Predynastic Egyptians to be more similar to other African groups than to Mediterranean or European populations (Keita, 1990; Zakrzewski, 2002). In addition, the Badarians have been described as near the centroid of cranial and dental variation among Predynastic and Dynastic populations studied (Irish, 2006; Zakrzewski, 2007). This suggests that, at least through the Early Dynastic period, the inhabitants of the Nile valley were a continuous population of local origin, and no major migration or replacement events occurred during this time.
Studies of cranial morphology also support the use of a Nubian (Kerma) population for a comparison of the Dynastic period, as this group is likely to be more closely genetically related to the early Nile valley inhabitants than would be the Late Dynastic Egyptians, who likely experienced significant mixing with other Mediterranean populations (Zakrzewski, 2002). A craniometric study found the Naqada and Kerma populations to be morphologically similar (Keita, 1990). Given these and other prior studies suggesting continuity (Berry et al., 1967; Berry and Berry, 1972), and the lack of archaeological evidence of major migration or population replacement during the Neolithic transition in the Nile valley, we may cautiously interpret the dental health changes over time as primarily due to ecological, subsistence, and demographic changes experienced throughout the Nile valley region." -- AP Starling, JT Stock. (2007). Dental Indicators of Health and Stress in Early Egyptian and Nubian Agriculturalists: A Difficult Transition and Gradual Recovery. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 134:520–528
And no I'm not through with you yet.edit on 12-11-2011 by SirShawn because: Quote error
"According to common knowledge, it has generally been held that there was a geographical, cultural and political boundary between Egypt and Nubia in the Predynastic/Early Dynastic period, and it was located between Gebel es Silsila and Aswan . Any Egyptian evidence in Nubia was seen as an import or cultural influence, while any Nubian evidence in Upper Egypt was viewed as the sporadic presence of foreign people within Egyptian territory. As a consequence, the cemeteries located from Kubbaniya southwards were assigned to the A-Group culture.
In recent years, new research on the subject shows that the interaction between the two cultures was much more complex than previously thought, affecting the time, space and nature of the interaction. As a result, the Aswan area probably never was a real borderline. As a result, the Aswan area probably never was a real borderline. The two regions, and so their cultural entities, are not antithetical to one another, but in prehistoric times are still the expression of the same cultural tradition, with strong regional variations, particularly in the last part of the 4th millennium BC.
Unique cultural features, unknown elsewhere, have been recorded in the area surrounding the First Cataract, and from there northward up to Hierakonpolis and probably even Armant, and southward down to Dehmit. The data recorded in this area always shows a preponderance of Naqadian elements, while the Nubian component, although consistent, is definitely in the minority, disproving an A-Group affiliation. These features may indicate the presence of a regional variant of the Naqada culture combining, particularly during the first half of the fourth millennium BC, both Egyptian and Nubian traditions."
"In the Predynastic period, the Egyptian and Nubian identities still shared many common traits derived from a common ancestry. The Naqada culture developed from the Badarian culture which, as the Tasian, was related to the Nubian Neolithic tradition (Gatto 2002; 2006c). Thus, the definition of what was Egyptian or Nubian at that time in the First Cataract region (and the southern part of Upper Egypt) is not so obvious: are the local cooking pots (shale-tempered ware), for example, Egyptian or Nubian? --GATTO M.C.(2009). Field season in the Aswan-Kom Ombo region of Egypt." Aswan-Kom Ombo. Archaeological Project. Report to: The Supreme Council of Antiquities, Egypt"
Originally posted by LUXUS
The story that is being presented here is that the Nubians are responsible for the Nile valley civilisation including the building of the pyramids i.e. that the Nubians slowly travelled along the Nile valley and eventually ended up in lower Egypt and decided to build the great pyramid. sorry but completely false.
1 Nekhen is the oldest and first civilisation in the Nile valley. Of all the mummy’s found there not one was Nubian.
2 The Egyptians actually built forts to keep the Nubians out of Egypt and on those forts are inscriptions which warn Nubians about the consequences of not keeping peace with Egypt.
3 Genetic testing on the bones found in the tomb of the pyramid builders has shown that they are the ancestors of modern Egyptians, not Nubians.
4 Ramses II was a fair skinned man as confirmed by testing of his hair, he had pail skin and red hair btw
5 Genetic testing has shown that the number of Nubians in lower Egypt increased only after the downfall of Egypt, proving that they could not have built it i.e. they were the minority not the majority!
Btw the
Nubians did not "unite" upper and lower Egypt, they invaded it during the twilight days of Egypt ie when security at the forts failed.
I know that there are a lot of black people, mostly African Americans who are trying their best to convince others and themselves that Egypt was their achievement, my only question would be why haven’t they managed to repeat even a fraction of it in deep Africa or anywhere else for that matter…maybe the white man stopped them
And that is what afrocentrism is really about, getting whitey, if not why do they only target and preach to white people? Surely they should be preaching to the Egyptians instead and tell them how they are stealing black peoples achievements?
Same can be said for the black Hebrew Israelites, they don’t preach to the Jews who say they are the Israelites but instead preach to white people of European origin about how they are the true Israelites.
Originally posted by SirShawn
reply to post by LUXUS
These statements are coming from the Supreme council of Egypt's Antiquities. Oh wait they must also be Afrocentric because they stating authoritatively that the Egyptians and the "black Nubians" were of the same biological and cultural origin. This is further confirmed in the study that was contained in my last post. So yes I guess that makes the original ancient Egyptians black as well, go figure.
"Tutankhamen was not black, and the portrayal of ancient Egyptian civilization as black has no element of truth to it”
"After having achieved this immense work, an important scientific conclusion remains to be drawn: the anthropological study and the microscopic analysis of hair, carried out by four laboratories: Judiciary Medecine (Professor Ceccaldi), Société L'Oréal, Atomic Energy Commission, and Institut Textile de France showed that Ramses II was a 'leucoderm', that is a fair-skinned man"
Definition of LEUCODERM : a person with a white or light skin : a person belonging to a light-skinned race Origin of LEUCODERM leuc- + -derm (fr. Gk derma skin)
Definition of LEUCODERM : a person with a white or light skin : a person belonging to a light-skinned race Origin of LEUCODERM leuc- + -derm (fr. Gk derma skin)
"Tutankhamen was not black, and the portrayal of ancient Egyptian civilization as black has no element of truth to it”