It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Fraud in signature collection for Obama and Hillary in 2008 !! Imagine 2012!

page: 1
6

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 12:03 PM
link   
Apparently Obama and Hillary both cheated in 2008 to get themselves on the Indiana ballot.


Former Gov. Joe Kernan says a signature on a petition to place Barack Obama's name on Indiana's 2008 primary ballot isn't his, putting him among dozens of dubious signatures found in a newspaper's investigation.

Kernan, a Democrat who campaigned for Hillary Clinton during the 2008 primary, told the South Bend Tribune that he didn't sign the Obama document.



The Tribune reported Wednesday that it has talked with more than 40 people who say they didn't sign ballot petitions submitted in St. Joseph County for Obama or Clinton, despite their names appearing on the documents.

State Republican Party Chairman Eric Holcomb has called for a federal investigation into the matter.


Interesting


The Tribune first reported Sunday that it and the Howey Politics Indiana newsletter had found pages from Clinton and Obama petitions with names and signatures that appear to have been copied by hand from a petition for 2008 Democratic gubernatorial hopeful Jim Schellinger. The petitions were filed with the Indiana Election Division after the St. Joseph County Voter Registration Office verified individuals' information on the documents.

The petitions were submitted in late January and early February 2008, weeks before it became apparent that Obama and Clinton would be hotly contesting Indiana's May primary in their tight race for the Democratic nomination. Clinton narrowly won the state, but Obama won many delegates in his successful drive for the nomination.

www.chicagotribune.com...

Anyone think Holder and his DOJ will investigate??
Will you hear about this on your nightly news?

Just another example of the blatant disregard of our election process. I can guarantee big trouble in the days following the 2012 election.




posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 12:15 PM
link   
This really isn't a shock. They're both phoneys, and I'm sooooooooo looking forward to November 2012. End of an error.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 12:17 PM
link   
reply to post by jibeho
 


This was for the primary...correct?

Why would the federal governement investigate a STATE primary that is controlled the a political party???



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 12:33 PM
link   
It seems like Obama and CO. are begging to be escorted out of the White House in handcuffs.

Everyday something new and criminal it seems with this bunch.

"The Gang that Couldn't Shoot Straight" should be the name of the Obama Administration.

If I could have business in the D.C area that I know would make a profit from here until the new POTUS is sworn it would be...... hmmmm thinking thinking.... more..... ANSWER:

A paper shredding company..... with a side business on shredder machine 24 hour/on call repairmen.
edit on 10/13/2011 by anon72 because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 12:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by jibeho
 


This was for the primary...correct?

Why would the federal governement investigate a STATE primary that is controlled the a political party???


maybe this is one answer....

there may be a federal law.



October 31, 2008

Feds investigate voter fraud at SD pro-abortion campaign HQ

Initially we thought UNHealthy Families, Chris Cassidy, and others on the staff there, violated South Dakota state law by committing voter fraud (a SD violation constitutes a misdemeanor - $2000 fine or 4 years in jail). Turns out this is a federal crime which is a felony and the US Attorney and FBI are now involved. A SD citizen filed a complaint and provided a 17 minute audio, video, affidavits and other evidence to the US Attorney and FBI.




(c) Whoever knowingly or willfully gives false information as to his name, address or period of residence in the voting district for the purpose of establishing his eligibility to register to vote, or conspires with another individual for the purpose of encouraging his false registration to vote or illegal voting, or pays or offers to pay or accepts payment either for registration to vote or for voting shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both: Provided, however, That this provision shall be applicable only to general, special, or primary elections held solely or in part for the purpose of selecting or electing any candidate for the office of President, Vice President, presidential elector, Member of the United States Sentate, Member of the United States House of Representatives, Delegate from the District of Colombia, Guam, or the Virgin Islands, or Resident Commissioner of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. (U.S.C.A. TItle 42. The Public Health and Welfare Chapter 20. Elective Franchise Subchapter I-A. Enforcing of Voting Rights 1973i Prohibited Acts)



Feds investigate voter fraud at SD pro-abortion campaign HQ


Lentz asks feds to investigate Meehan’s petitions


PHILADELPHIA—State Representative Bryan Lentz (D-7) said Thursday that only a truly independent investigator can credibly examine the problems with Republican opponent Pat Meehan’s nominating petitions, and he called for the U.S. Department of Justice to pick up the investigation.

During a late-morning news conference in front of the federal courthouse here, Lentz spoke more directly and more forcefully than before about the evidence of fraudulent and invalid signatures his campaign uncovered in poring through the nominating petitions that Meehan, a former U.S. Attorney, submitted to get on the primary ballot in the 7th Congressional District. Lentz also made his most pointed argument to date that Meehan, who is also a former Delaware County District Attorney, is inherently tied to the powerful GOP political machine in the county.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 01:01 PM
link   
reply to post by anon72
 



If I could have business in the D.C area that I know would make a profit from here until the new POTUS is sworn it would be...... hmmmm thinking thinking.... more..... ANSWER:

A paper shredding company..... with a side business on shredder machine 24 hour/on call repairmen.



A paper trail may be giving them too much credit......

it's contingent on the fact they can even write and press "print" on a computer.
then the printer needs to have ink and paper in it.
AND, the printer needs to be plugged in.
THEN, the papers have to be filed in an orderly fashion........
not sure all that is even possible !!!


My choice would be a psychiatric rehabilitaion clinic the size of a small city






posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 02:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by OutKast Searcher
reply to post by jibeho
 


This was for the primary...correct?

Why would the federal governement investigate a STATE primary that is controlled the a political party???


It falls under the general jurisdiction of the Department of Justice. There are close to 100 departments that fall under DOJ jurisdiction including the FBI, DEA, ATF etc etc

So, Bring in the FBI please? Fraud is fraud eh? The FBI routinely investigates these matters.


Election fraud: Under certain circumstances, the FBI investigates election frauds that stem from campaign finance crimes, voter/ballot fraud, or civil rights violations.

www.fbi.gov...



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 02:55 PM
link   
reply to post by navy_vet_stg3
 


Ron Paul or no one else, No to War Mongers



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 04:06 PM
link   

Originally posted by Agent_USA_Supporter
reply to post by navy_vet_stg3
 


Ron Paul or no one else, No to War Mongers


Hopefully you are a US citizen residing in Canada?

If not, sir or m'am, you have no say.....with all due respect.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 04:10 PM
link   
reply to post by jibeho
 


Read this item on Drudge yesterday. I have to say it surprises me not one bit. What does surprise me, though, is that it was exposed by the Tribune. Seems to be a trend where a lot of shills for the Prez are becoming former shills. Next year should be interesting.

edit on 13-10-2011 by Hugues de Payens because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 04:29 PM
link   
lets see a crook investigating another crook im not holding my breath

its pathetic and the "most honest administration" in us history has been shown time and time again to be anything but and shown to be one of the most corrupt ones we have ever seen.

but hey all that yes we can mantra just means yes we can get away with anything.

i am so sick of that administration and cant wait til 2012 gets here and i hope that america finally gets its head out of its butt and votes those criminals out.
edit on 13-10-2011 by neo96 because: fixed.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 04:32 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


Amen brother

But you should have put "most honest adminstration" in quotation marks.



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 04:32 PM
link   
reply to post by navy_vet_stg3
 


True , but one is Phonier than the other me Thinks..........


i297.photobucket.com...
edit on 13-10-2011 by Zanti Misfit because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 13 2011 @ 04:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by Hugues de Payens
reply to post by jibeho
 


Read this item on Drudge yesterday. I have to say it surprises me not one bit. What does surprise me, though, is that it was exposed by the Tribune. Seems to be a trend where a lot of shills for the Prez are becoming former shills. Next year should be interesting.

edit on 13-10-2011 by Hugues de Payens because: (no reason given)


The Tribune cracking this case surprised me too. Chicagoland is a complete mess right now under the direction of Rahm. Lets see if this case gains any more attention. Obama's traditional base has certainly begun to crumble.



new topics

top topics



 
6

log in

join