I've got a couple issues with the story, the 1st being it's from Weekly World News so it's automatically BS. But I'm sure some people will take
the ball and run with it so I'll bring up a few points to give those folks something to argue about.
1. The 2nd link to your story that you posted midway 1st page actually lists the WWN write Frank Lake as the author. Even though the site is Mark
Fleming TV it's still using the WWN as it's source.
2. Laser Powered Energy weapons aimed directly at our moon. Ummm ok their primary weapon will burn a hole in something. Second the laser would have
appeared as a beam not a flash. 3rd, they missed the moon. They are near Mars, if you were looking in the SW sky that night(never mind they didn't
give a time it happened as I'm sure some amateur astronomer was recording something and a time could disprove this BS), did anyone check the position
of the moon relative to earth and mars? They also didn't give a region it could be viewed from so there is some more tripe there, obviously an
Australian and someone in Ireland weren't going to both see it. They are doing everything possible to be vague so the story can't be disproved.
3.These are advanced alien aircraft(not spacecraft) capable of transforming their physical form but it takes them 2 months to get from Mars to here.
And they are dumb enough to fire a warning shot from 2 months away warning us they are here. If they are coming to destroy us then why fire a warning
shot? If you can attack from Mars and not be in any danger from us then why wouldn't you stay there and bomb away?
4. Astronomers can't detect them. The expert says you must be trained to be able to see them. If they actually change their physical form to that
of comets, moons, debris, asteroids and space dust then you couldn't identify them visually with our tech. In theory you could surmise that that
miraculous new moon of Mars isn't really a moon but with our tech how can you train someone to tell when a rock isn't a rock?
5."We’ve been monitoring all objects in space within 50,000 miles of the spaceships and logging data. We have advanced alien spaceship tracking
programs that relay all information about a spaceship and it’s activities.” Umm then you don't have to be trained, the program tracks it for
you. As far as "ALL" of it's activities, that sounds like an exaggeration.
6.Ummm Planet Zeeba and Gootan. The Gootans or more hostile and the Zeebans are more intelligent. In another article Malley was trying to imagine
what they look like and what they were like.
7. In this article www.afro-squad.com...
Malley talks about those same aliens. There
is no Jenna Hawser missing in Santa Fe. Hoax.8.,
8. One of the preeminent UFOlogists in China Mao Kan was mentioned. The writer said he spoke to him but never quoted him. I can find nothing
legitimate about Kan. At least not a Kan I believe to be the same guy referenced in the article. If he's real he's irrelevant.
More info about the alleged aliens. But in this one Malley says they
come in peace. The author also quoted a fiction professor at MIT as a source. HOAX
10. I must have missed wikileaks an the massive alien agenda hats been covered up.
11.SETI isn't tracking alien spaceships. SETI is looking for directed radio broadcasts. In the meantime the SETI Institute has been focussing on
the future. In a joint project with UC Berkeley, it is building a SETI-dedicated array of telescopes that will equal a 100-meter radio telescope, the
Allen Telescope Array. It is the forerunner of other larger radio astronomy arrays planned for later in the decade. It is possible that as telescope
and SETI technology advance it may be possible to detect intelligence not by directed message but by the same kind of 'noise' we accidentally
broadcast to the cosmos via radio, television and radar signals. SETI truly is a long-term project. SETI isn't capable of doing what is said. Nor
do they mention a specific person.
12. UN Panel on Extraterrestrials- 1st Dr Nirmal Bappu isn't world renowned for anything. Dr Malley was not on the only UN panel that dealt with
the ET issue. This was the panel established when the so called appointment of Othman as the take me to your leader person was happening. Now to
quote othman "She pointed out that the panel consisted of representatives from the United States National Aeronautics and Space Administration
(NASA), the United Kingdom’s Government, and a lawyer on outer space law from the University of Nebraska and her contribution to the panel was
focused on what issues might present themselves for discussion in the United Nations." DR and I use that term loosely Malley was not on this panel
as he's never been an employee of NASA or a member of the British Government nor was he the Nebraska attorney.