It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gimme_some_truth
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by TsukiLunar
Not trying to butt in, but this man was an American citizen and was never convicted of anything in the court of law. So any one of us can be labeled a terrorist, and then killed without any evidence being presented and being convicted by a jury of your peers.
I mean.. Let's say some one is attacking the one you love most. You can stop them from hurting that person... Are you going to stop them or are you going to wait for a judge to walk by?
Originally posted by The Sword
Reply to post by kalunom
People will stop at nothing to lynch our president, even when it comes to offenses like this.
Where was Ron Paul when the Bush administration had a part in Saddam's death? Feel free to point out anything that Paul might have said at the time.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
bring it on, as gwb said.
Originally posted by sdcigarpig
The problem that many are having is that President Obama did indeed violate the spirit and letter of the law when the cleric was killed.
This cleric, Al-Awari, what exactly did he do that would justify his death? Was he personally responsible for someone else launching an attack against the US, or pick up a weapon and attack? After all, to all knowledge, he was until his death, still a citizen of the US, with all of the rights and protections under the law. There was no trial, no court of inquest, no grand jury findings, no presentation of the evidence that would be a matter of public record, just a cleric with a fiery rhetoric that spurred others to take actions.
Yet, when we first started the conflict in Afghanistan, a member of the US, John Walker Lidhn, the American Taliban, who stated he renounced his citizenship, was captured, after willfully picking up a weapon and firing on US troops, got 20 years.
Other people have often called for, even having their followers take matters into their own hands, have done such, and they were not sentenced to death without so much as benefit of a trial, so what makes this man so different?
The President crossed a line, and opened a door that should not have been opened. Every President since Nixon, has condemned and even forbidden through executive order assassination. Even Nixon, forbade the use of such against leaders of other countries, as it sets a dangerous precedence. There is now nothing to stop such actions from occurring on US soil by foreign powers, as they can use this one death as justifications as reason to go after dissidents that are seeking asylum on US soil and territory, and they would have no protections under the law.
If speaking out against the US is considered to be traitorous activities, without so much as a trial or the witnesses required by law, to prove that such occurred, then we are up the creek, cause any one of us could be considered such by the current actions of the President. His very actions sets in motion to allow for such to happen to those who would be on a list that we know about, but have no way of telling who is on the list, after all there are over 1 million people who are on the do not fly list, and how many of those would be marked for death by this government? Will voices of discord and descent be silenced, and we be forced into the darkness of fear, our very right to speak eroded by the possible penalty of death at the hands of the military or the CIA?
The answer must be no, and we should all condemn our leaders for allowing, if not admonishing the US President for allowing this to happen. We have laws, and among those are the very idea that a person is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, and if there is no court, no charges, no presentation of evidence to justify this action. It was wrong to start with and wrong now, we can not allow for this to happen, against our own citizens.
Originally posted by KonquestAbySS
reply to post by FOXMULDER147
kills yet another Al-Qaeda scumbag
Have you been in the loop lately, Al-Qaeda is the CIA Middle Eastern militia.
Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the Libyan rebel leader, has said jihadists who fought against allied troops in Iraq are on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Gaddafi's regime.
Mr al-Hasidi admitted he had earlier fought against "the foreign invasion" in Afghanistan, before being "captured in 2002 in Peshwar, in Pakistan". He was later handed over to the US, and then held in Libya before being released in 2008.
Currently the U.S. State Department has one official on the ground in Libya, as well as five contractors who specialize in "explosive ordinance disposal", all working with the rebel Transitional National Council to find the looted missiles, White House spokesperson Jay Carney told reporters.
"I myself could have removed several hundred if I wanted to, and people can literally drive up with pickup trucks or even 18 wheelers and take away whatever they want," said Bouckaert, HRW's emergencies director. "Every time I arrive at one of these weapons facilities, the first thing we notice going missing is the surface-to-air missiles."
"I think the probability of al Qaeda being able to smuggle some of the stinger-like missiles out of Libya is probably pretty high," said Richard Clarke, former White House counterterrorism advisor and now a consultant to ABC News.
Abdelhakim Belhaj, aka Abu Abdallah al-Sadek, is a Libyan jihadi. Born in May 1966, he honed his skills with the mujahideen in the 1980s anti-Soviet jihad in Afghanistan.
Originally posted by The Old American
So our constitution is a technicality to you? Rights of American citizens are just...what...guidelines?
If we are fighting to stop them from spreading hatred and death, why give them guns?
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
Originally posted by The Old American
So our constitution is a technicality to you? Rights of American citizens are just...what...guidelines?
This man being an "American" is a technicality. In what other sense could you call this man an American?
Originally posted by spyder550
Sticking to your guns is not an admirable trait when you are wrong -- then it is just pig pigheadedness a smart man is not a pigheaded man. Along with the 1100 other terrorist killed on president Obama's watch -- this man was a sworn enemy of the USA -- he became that voluntarily presumabsly he knew the risks that decision involved - remember - personal responsibility.edit on 3-10-2011 by spyder550 because: (no reason given)
The majority of this thread would have rather sent US military troops into his compound possibly costing multiple American lives and still having the same result one less "bad" guy?
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
reply to post by The Old American
None of those you mentioned ever declared war on the U.S.A., or were part of a group which did.
That is the difference that you, and many others, seem to be struggling to grasp.
A man with nothing left to lose is a very dangerous man and his energy/anger can be focused toward a common/righteous goal. What I'm asking you to do, then, is sit back and be honest with yourself. Do you have kids/wife? Would you back out at the last minute to care for the family? Are you interested in keeping your firearms for their current/future monetary value, or would you drag that '06 through rock, swamp and cactus...to get off the needed shot? In short, I'm not looking for talkers, I'm looking for fighters...And if you are a fed, think twice. Think twice about the Constitution you are supposedly enforcing (isn't "enforcing freedom" an oxymoron?) and think twice about catching us with our guard down – you will lose just like Degan did – and your family will lose.
To these people in Oklahoma who have lost a loved one, I'm sorry but it happens every day. You're not the first mother to lose a kid, or the first grandparent to lose a grandson or a granddaughter. It happens every day, somewhere in the world. I'm not going to go into that courtroom, curl into a fetal ball and cry just because the victims want me to do that.
Originally posted by The Old American
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
Originally posted by The Old American
So our constitution is a technicality to you? Rights of American citizens are just...what...guidelines?
This man being an "American" is a technicality. In what other sense could you call this man an American?
A legal, constitutional one maybe? Just sayin'.
Out of curiosity, was Tim McVeigh an American to you, or was that just a technicality? How about Charles Manson? Henry Lee Lucas? They committed many more atrocities (committed by their own hands) than al-Awlaki did. Yet they got trials in an American court of law. And every one of them was an enemy of America.
/TOA
I highly doubt we would of lost anyone if a Seal team 6 like team was used.
Originally posted by fooks
Originally posted by The Old American
Originally posted by FOXMULDER147
Originally posted by The Old American
So our constitution is a technicality to you? Rights of American citizens are just...what...guidelines?
This man being an "American" is a technicality. In what other sense could you call this man an American?
A legal, constitutional one maybe? Just sayin'.
Out of curiosity, was Tim McVeigh an American to you, or was that just a technicality? How about Charles Manson? Henry Lee Lucas? They committed many more atrocities (committed by their own hands) than al-Awlaki did. Yet they got trials in an American court of law. And every one of them was an enemy of America.
/TOA
did you just have a stroke?
lol!
were these guys caught here in the us?
they were criminal acts, not acts of war.
Individuals declaring war on the U.S. happens all the time, even by American citizens.
Yet they haven't been targeted for assassination.
I get the feeling that the only way you leftists would consider him an American citizen is if he had come over here illegally and given a path to citizenship.