It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Whiteopz
reply to post by Shirak
Yes but do you believe these creatures to be intelligant? No matter what the size they do not seem to posses intelligance.
Space could have theese creatures as a being is it really that hard to believe?
Also the tether incident the camera was well out of focus while there were objects present some of huge suggested size could not be identfied as 'Rods'
Its always good to have a proactive feedback on here people have different with different views on things.
Some members have become too established to be wrong on anything they say. I have wathced this forum for a couple of years and now decided to post my views when I am entitled I will be raising a few eye raising threads.
Peaceedit on 25-9-2011 by Whiteopz because: (no reason given)edit on 25-9-2011 by Whiteopz because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Harte
Yes, there is no "phenomena" there to "prove."
They are bugs - usually moths, and that's that.
So, yes, "RODS" are explained.
On the other hand, nobody has explained the SHAFTS that skeptics keep getting in threads like this one.
Harte
Source
A trusted fellow researcher I know recently caught this "rod" footage while shooting with his infrared camera. I believe this footage is genuine
Originally posted by cripmeister
This is what member Harte said in a "rod" discussion last year
Originally posted by Harte
Yes, there is no "phenomena" there to "prove."
They are bugs - usually moths, and that's that.
So, yes, "RODS" are explained.
On the other hand, nobody has explained the SHAFTS that skeptics keep getting in threads like this one.
Harte
Source
Carry on.
Originally posted by dave0davidson
Rods have been proven to be bugs flying close by the camera.
2nd.
Originally posted by skylightsintheillions
Sure, some rods have been proven to be insects, how is that any sort of empirical proof or explanation of the video on this thread? Why don't you identify which insect this video is supposedly of? Ignorance denied.
Originally posted by MainLineThis
How come none of these "serious rod researchers" (I laugh as I type that) have wasted all this money on video equipment but are too ignorant to understand how it operates and the principles that dictate that operation. Oh well, guess what they say about a fool and his money is 100% true.
On the other hand, why don't these "serious rod researchers" (again, I laughed as I typed that) just go out and buy a freaking net? I imagine they are just smart enough to be able to properly swing a net, right?
Originally posted by Jimbowsk
'Rods' have been proved to be insects over and over, I'm not quite sure why this still stands as a phenomenon with some people? Have a looksy all over the internet - these are insects/bugs filmed with equipment that doesn't have sufficient frame rate to capture a still of the wings in motion, and it makes the pattern as seen in the footage of this thread..
Show me HD/High Speed footage of a 'Rod' and THEN maybe we'll have something interesting to look into