It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
No, these were people intent on killing and taking land at any cost. If all they wanted was survival they would not have killing the British to run them out. They want open warfare because they believe they will come out on top no matter how far it escalates.
Thats what it boils down to - survival.
No I wouldnt be lieing at all. You should understand whats said before trying to comment on it.
The onlything Israel wanted was a peace treaty with her neighbors and the acknowledgment that they have a right to exist.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by Xcathdra
Israel is what I call a "mini-me": a state that wanted so badly to have the military might of the United States. They married it to the same tactics used by Nazis during WWII and thus, Israel was born.
Personally, I'd support getting the holy # out of the middle east. Life's too short to fight for a bunch of #ing cowards that control you.
Originally posted by The Sword
Israel is what I call a "mini-me": a state that wanted so badly to have the military might of the United States. They married it to the same tactics used by Nazis during WWII and thus, Israel was born.
Which is to end up saying, "We would negotiate if there was anyone who we could negotiate with."
It does seem like the Israelis are searching for a final solution.
Originally posted by letscit
reply to post by Xcathdra
i have a question would israel be any good at protecting israel if america withdrew its weapons and money? i believe it would be more fair for sure. the side that could make the better slingshot would win. but the U.S. needed an ally in the M.E. i believe those days are over. it is time to kick israel off the couch and make them go out and get a job. enough living off the American's.
no
Originally posted by tamusan
reply to post by jmdewey60
I honestly believe that both sides view compromise as defeat, and any talk of compromise is nothing more than a stalling tactic.
Originally posted by letscit
reply to post by Xcathdra
i have a question would israel be any good at protecting israel if america withdrew its weapons and money? i believe it would be more fair for sure. the side that could make the better slingshot would win. but the U.S. needed an ally in the M.E. i believe those days are over. it is time to kick israel off the couch and make them go out and get a job. enough living off the American's.
Originally posted by jmdewey60
no
Originally posted by tamusan
reply to post by jmdewey60
I honestly believe that both sides view compromise as defeat, and any talk of compromise is nothing more than a stalling tactic.
Only one side gains from stalling, which is the side that is eating up the other.