It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mad scientist
entirely an initiative of Omsk Plant. It originates from the now-closed Nikolai Popov's design bureau at Leningrad Kirov Plant (LKZ)
Originally posted by Hocico
State acceptance trials of the new tank started at the Kubinka Proving Ground in August or September of 1998...
Originally posted by Hocico
The latest version of the T-80U being developed is the T-80UM2, which is designed to engage targets while stationary or on the move...
Originally posted by Kozzy
ARGHHH
The Black Eagle DOES NOT HAVE AN UNMANNED TURRET. IT HAS A CONVENTIONAL LAYOUT AND A 125MM GUN!!
THE T-95 HAS A 152MM GUN AND AN UNMANNED TURRET
THEY ARE TWO DIFFERENT TANKS
Originally posted by Kozzy
Look at the friggin turret. It's bigger then other friggin Russian tanks so why would it be unmanned? The tank has a turret bustle for storing ammo, Abrams style. But why would it need to store ammo like that unless THERE ARE CREW IN THE TURRET? It's a heavily modernized T-80, the designation is T-80UM2 I believe. The gun IS a new model 125mm.
YOU KNOW WHY I KNOW THIS, BECAUSE THE INFORMATION WAS RELEASED MORE THEN A YEAR AGO!!.
THE T-95 IS THE DESIGN WITH THE UNMANNED TURRET. It is the future Russian tank, the BE is for export.
[edit on 25-8-2004 by Kozzy]
Originally posted by taibunsuu
Why the is the gun 152mm? Does it also fire missiles? It seems a bit wide for high-velocity anti-tank ammo. God knows what type of firepower it'd take to pierce the front armor on an Abrams.
Originally posted by mad scientist
The old US Army M551 Sheridan had a gun/missile system firing laser guided Shileigh(?) missiles. However its weight of 20 tonnes didn't alow for the recoil force of the gun, making it very uncomfortable for the crew. It saw service in the 70's and was then withdrawn.
A gun of this size would be much more stable on an MBT.
Originally posted by taibunsuu
The Sheridan is still in use by the 82nd airborne since it's so light.
Also used in Opfor at the NTC.
Originally posted by LordofLard
Don't modern era Russian tanks already fire ATGMs?
Originally posted by stgeorge
Can the Bradley take out a tank with its missiles? Maybe,if it got the first shot in.But whose optics are more superiour? That was the problem we had with the Gaermans in WW2 remember? Guns like the 128mm (ancient technology) scoring 7km hits.No anti tank missile i think goes that far....
Originally posted by stgeorge
Can the Bradley take out a tank with its missiles? Maybe,if it got the first shot in.But whose optics are more superiour? That was the problem we had with the Gaermans in WW2 remember? Guns like the 128mm (ancient technology) scoring 7km hits.No anti tank missile i think goes that far....
Originally posted by longbow
1. Bradley's destroyed much more vehicles than Abrams tanks during GW1.
2. Some misilles could go that far - Helfire, future Commond misille, and some russian ones too.