It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Wha-? No 9-11 was not augmented reality. Considering a close friend of mine was pretty much at ground zero- I have it on good word that it did, in fact, happen.
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Wha-? No 9-11 was not augmented reality. Considering a close friend of mine was pretty much at ground zero- I have it on good word that it did, in fact, happen.
Did your friend hear a plane? Did your friend see a plane hit WTC?
And if so, could it be memories thanks to the immense news coverage and "programming" being done?
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Though the theory of AR is not something I believe either.
But it is still a fact that the video does not show any plane hitting the tower.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Wha-? No 9-11 was not augmented reality. Considering a close friend of mine was pretty much at ground zero- I have it on good word that it did, in fact, happen.
Did your friend hear a plane? Did your friend see a plane hit WTC?
And if so, could it be memories thanks to the immense news coverage and "programming" being done?
Yes she heard the plane. Yes she saw the second one hit.
No, that's ridiculous.
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Though the theory of AR is not something I believe either.
But it is still a fact that the video does not show any plane hitting the tower.
I watched the plane hit the second tower on tv a decade ago as well as yesterday.
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Wha-? No 9-11 was not augmented reality. Considering a close friend of mine was pretty much at ground zero- I have it on good word that it did, in fact, happen.
Did your friend hear a plane? Did your friend see a plane hit WTC?
And if so, could it be memories thanks to the immense news coverage and "programming" being done?
Yes she heard the plane. Yes she saw the second one hit.
No, that's ridiculous.
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Though the theory of AR is not something I believe either.
But it is still a fact that the video does not show any plane hitting the tower.
I watched the plane hit the second tower on tv a decade ago as well as yesterday.
Ok.
Yes I was watching TV as well. As soon as the broadcasts started and after that for many days...
So you are implying that if it is on TV, it has to be true? There is absolutely no existing technology that could have been used to make it look like a plane hit the tower?edit on 12-9-2011 by LiberalSceptic because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by RadeonGFXRHumanGTXisAlien
Here's 12,000 pages of witness accounts from EMT's, Firefighters and paramedics:
graphics8.nytimes.com...
You should have a long hard look at what's real and what's fantasy mate, because you're stuck firmly in fantasy world.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Wha-? No 9-11 was not augmented reality. Considering a close friend of mine was pretty much at ground zero- I have it on good word that it did, in fact, happen.
Did your friend hear a plane? Did your friend see a plane hit WTC?
And if so, could it be memories thanks to the immense news coverage and "programming" being done?
Yes she heard the plane. Yes she saw the second one hit.
No, that's ridiculous.
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Though the theory of AR is not something I believe either.
But it is still a fact that the video does not show any plane hitting the tower.
I watched the plane hit the second tower on tv a decade ago as well as yesterday.
Ok.
Yes I was watching TV as well. As soon as the broadcasts started and after that for many days...
So you are implying that if it is on TV, it has to be true? There is absolutely no existing technology that could have been used to make it look like a plane hit the tower?edit on 12-9-2011 by LiberalSceptic because: (no reason given)
Not convincingly at the time.
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Wha-? No 9-11 was not augmented reality. Considering a close friend of mine was pretty much at ground zero- I have it on good word that it did, in fact, happen.
Did your friend hear a plane? Did your friend see a plane hit WTC?
And if so, could it be memories thanks to the immense news coverage and "programming" being done?
Yes she heard the plane. Yes she saw the second one hit.
No, that's ridiculous.
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Though the theory of AR is not something I believe either.
But it is still a fact that the video does not show any plane hitting the tower.
I watched the plane hit the second tower on tv a decade ago as well as yesterday.
Ok.
Yes I was watching TV as well. As soon as the broadcasts started and after that for many days...
So you are implying that if it is on TV, it has to be true? There is absolutely no existing technology that could have been used to make it look like a plane hit the tower?edit on 12-9-2011 by LiberalSceptic because: (no reason given)
Not convincingly at the time.
Ah ok. Well I guess you know that for a fact.
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Originally posted by TsukiLunar
Wha-? No 9-11 was not augmented reality. Considering a close friend of mine was pretty much at ground zero- I have it on good word that it did, in fact, happen.
Did your friend hear a plane? Did your friend see a plane hit WTC?
And if so, could it be memories thanks to the immense news coverage and "programming" being done?
Yes she heard the plane. Yes she saw the second one hit.
No, that's ridiculous.
Originally posted by LiberalSceptic
Though the theory of AR is not something I believe either.
But it is still a fact that the video does not show any plane hitting the tower.
I watched the plane hit the second tower on tv a decade ago as well as yesterday.
Ok.
Yes I was watching TV as well. As soon as the broadcasts started and after that for many days...
So you are implying that if it is on TV, it has to be true? There is absolutely no existing technology that could have been used to make it look like a plane hit the tower?edit on 12-9-2011 by LiberalSceptic because: (no reason given)
Not convincingly at the time.
Ah ok. Well I guess you know that for a fact.
yah, i do. CG still looks like crap today(mostly). There is no way they would be able to pull it off back then. Especially in having the tapes stand up to close examination Not to mention all of the different tapes match up. Unless of course you suggesting that every recording of the event was some kind of government plant that is using technology that didn't exist.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by LiberalSceptic
It just wouldn't make sense. Why over complicate something they could do much easier in real life.
Not to mention it would eliminate the problem of real life witnesses.