Daytime Photos of Rectangular "UFO" over Round Rock, TX

Hmmm....The only thing I can come up with is this....


Hehe...sorry I couldn't resist. Or it looks like a door in the sky. Odd looking.

Is it air-mail? Ok enough with the wise cracks, honestly OP, I haven't got a clue what it is. I thought it might have been a very weird artifact, but as there are 3 images, that rules that out...

reply to post by CaptGizmo


Having multiple images lends to the credibility,
But I have to admit my eyebrows raised a bit when I read his back story...

I immediately thought it was a plane banner as well, but it does seem short for that, there's no plane, and based on the witnessed description it hovered back and forth for about five minutes.

Unless the guy who took the pic is a liar, and knows it, then this object is unexplained.

Hmmm he says he was looking out his window...could this be something stuck to the glass? piece of tape or maybe it was drawn on the glass with a marker? I've seen things i couldn't identify but when you're not seeing the object with your own eyes its a bit hard to speculate

NM>....
analyzing the others I just found...


OK after looking at the 2 other original images.....it clearly looks like a banner.....and looks like the plane was conviently left out of the camera field of vision...

.....JMO

...looks like a piece of sheet metal to me... the thin ones with grooves can get airborn easily and fly far, especially in the high winds we've had lately...

The "craft" is not uniformly rectangular or square, as if made from a flimsy material, i.e, a banner.

As I have said before, never show a picture of any ufo on ats as so called experts do nothing but debunk. If I photoed on right now and it was legitimate, I would go elsewhere, ats is known for being closed minded on this subject.

I do believe in alien life but this looks like a banner without the plane!

reply to post by Genophage


I dunno how anyone anytime ever could mistake a piece of tape on their window for a craft in the sky, unless they have really awful vision. He says he saw it fly away.....tape is highly regarded for it's adhesive properties, not for it's ability to fly.


And if he purposely took a picture of a piece of tape and tried to pass it off as a craft well then what a crappy hoax.....I mean really now, a five year old could do better than that.

reply to post by TXRabbit


That is an interesting picture, but maybe it's a moving portal. Or someone left the attic door open.

reply to post by TXRabbit


I must say this picture is an obvious fake. You can see where the picture was cut off near the top of the photo and spliced with another.

Debunked. Do you guys have eyes? lol.

Ooops, I take that back. Grabbed EXIF from the wrong image.

According to EXIF, hasn't been edited. BUT, EXIFs can be falsified.

EXIF info as follows:

Camera Make = CASIO COMPUTER CO.,LTD.
Camera Model = EX-Z33
Picture Orientation = normal (1)
X-Resolution = 72/1 ===> 72
Y-Resolution = 72/1 ===> 72
X/Y-Resolution Unit = inch (2)
Software / Firmware Version = 1.00
Last Modified Date/Time = 2011:09:02 23:57:52
Y/Cb/Cr Positioning (Subsampling) = co-sited / datum point (2)

EXIF Sub IFD

Exposure Time (1 / Shutter Speed) = 10/4000 second ===> 1/400 second ===> 0.0025 second
Lens F-Number / F-Stop = 5600/1000 ===> ƒ/5.6
Exposure Program = normal program (2)
ISO Speed Ratings = 64
EXIF Version = 0221
Original Date/Time = 2011:09:02 23:57:52
Digitization Date/Time = 2011:09:02 23:57:52
Components Configuration = 0x01,0x02,0x03,0x00 / YCbCr
Compressed Bits per Pixel = 5221048/8871936 ===> 0.59
Aperture Value (APEX) = 4970/1000
Aperture = ƒ/5.6
Exposure Bias (EV) = 0/10 ===> 0
Max Aperture Value (APEX) = 4970/1000 ===> 4.97
Max Aperture = ƒ/5.6
Metering Mode = pattern / multi-segment (5)
Light Source / White Balance = unknown (0)
Flash = Flash fired, compulsory flash mode
Focal Length = 18900/1000 mm ===> 18.9 mm
FlashPix Version = 0100
Colour Space = sRGB (1)
Image Width = 3648 pixels
Image Height = 2432 pixels
Image Source = digital still camera (DSC)
Custom Rendered = normal process (0)
Exposure Mode = auto exposure (0)
White Balance = auto (0)
Digital Zoom Ratio = 400/100 ===> 4
Focal Length in 35mm Film = 107
Scene Capture Type = standard (0)
Gain Control = n/a (0)
Contrast = normal (0)
Saturation = normal (0)
Sharpness = normal (0)

shuttle bay door of a cloaked ship. only supposed to happen at night.
some noob at the console probably hit the wrong button.

I enhanced it best I could using the original image.



Interesting to say the least.

reply to post by TXRabbit


Obviously, someone is pulling everyone's leg. This is an altered picture; and when the contrast and brightness is adjusted, you can plainly see the rectangular "crop" box where the "whatever it is" was copied and pasted rather crudely over a scene of the sky or original photograph.

It's retouched, and it is not some UFO in the daytime.

It amazes me how someone can post junk and people believe it's some "grand UFO" when it is just someone crudely faking-it.

DEBUNKED!

Originally posted by TheLonePhantom
I enhanced it best I could using the original image.

Interesting to say the least.

Remove the filter you applied to it to hide the "cropped rectangle." Another fake.

DEBUNKED!

reply to post by TXRabbit


If this is a plane flying a banner, wheres the plane?

In-case you want further "debunking proof," see the image below: The brightness and contrast is adjusted to high-light the "rectangle" where someone cropped ans pasted an image of "something" on-top of a day-time scene to create a crude illusion of the composite being a UFO in the daytime.

DEBUNKED!