reply to post by Jugtalicus
Listen to how this scum# talks...trying to mask his true intention behind jargon speak and not being completely blunt about what he really means. At
least it seems that way. Regardless, lets think about this, if this guy truly had respect and cared for the American people, OR people in general for
that matter, why propose that having another terror attack that would destroy many peoples lives be a "good" thing to reawaken some frenzied mob like
behavior in the masses where they are easily controlled?
Again you are ignoring the context. Let me try to explain.
first, you have to come to grips with the fact that, real or not, Rummy BELIEVES there is a credible terrorist threat and that 911 was a first strike
on us soil. Keep that in mind ok?
What he is saying is the president is a "victim" of his success at stopping another terrorist attack. victim referring to the support for him, and
the war on terror and all the laws and restrictions that go along with that.
Again, remember, Rummy BELIEVES arab terrorists are behind every curtain just waiting to slit your throat.
It's a fact that the farther away from that day we get, the more "complacent" people become, and ignore or belittle the threat that Rummy
When saying the only answer for that is another attack, he's not inferring another attack would be good. He's saying, with the current feelings of
the average american, ONLY another attack would bring them back in line in supporting what they are doing.
you've got to understand that some of these "hawks" honestly believe the end justifies the means, and they are doing something GOOD.
He's not accepting responsibility, and he's not lamenting over the fact that there hasn't been another attack, nor is he wishing for one.
He's CLEARLY stating that support for the war on terror is steadily dropping as more time passes, and at this point, nothing short of another attack
would bring people back in line. He's stating that without proper full on support of the american people, they are limited in their ability to
protect those people, and nothing short of another attack would get that support back. I do think he's right there, but not for the reasons he
And no, I don't agree with him, the wars, or the official story. I'm just sick of crap like this tainting ME. Yes, I'm being completely selfish.
This type of stuff, as well as the no planes garbage, gets spread over EVERYONE who questions the official story, regardless of what THEY think
I could actually post a link to a thread from this week where I was accused to suggesting that no planes were used and was told "ok smarty pants,
where did all the passengers on the planes go then?". Simple, into the god damn world trade center with the plane, only an idiot would question that
Yet, some of you do, and it's used to slander ALL of us.
This is not an admission of guilt, not matter how out of context you want to take the quotes. I'm not going to let you smear us all with half quotes
edit on 31-8-2011 by phishyblankwaters because: (no reason given)