It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
Americans nationwide continue to lose faith in the Federal Reserve Board to keep inflation under control, with the number who say they are paying more for groceries now at an all-time high. ... 93% of adults report paying more for groceries now than they did a year ago, the highest finding to date. Only four percent (4%) say they’re not paying more for groceries now compared to a year ago.
Originally posted by Partygirl
This shouldn't be too much of a surprise; just look at your own bills!
I see shrinking portions and growing price tags...meanwhile my own humble wage remains as it is, making it humbler than ever.
Something has got to break...how much more can we take???
What I want to know is, how are people coping? Where are you getting the money from??? Under the sofa? eBay selling?
www.rasmussenreports.com
(visit the link for the full news article)edit on 16-8-2011 by Partygirl because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by queenofsheba
Although, I must add, do we really need the cookies and treats the size of our hands?
Originally posted by Six6Six
reply to post by Partygirl
Who cares? Lets be honest. Food shopping is not a real concern....well not for me anyway. I do not care if my food bill is slightly higher now than this time last year.
".....the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) is being forced on their industry. The U.S. signed a World Trade Organization (WTO) treaty and is now submitting to global rules on animal trade established by the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE). The OIE wants the U.S. to accept imports from countries where animal disease problems persist. For example, while the U.S. eradicated Equine Piroplasmosis – a tick-borne protozoal infection, the OIE wants the U.S. to accept imports from countries that have not eradicated this disease. With NAIS, horse movements could be traced from birth to death, thus eliminating the need to disallow high-risk imports because, according to the OIE, the U.S. could manage contagious diseases within its borders.
R-Calf
the agency ordered field staff --
• not to perform E.coli O157:H7 tests on ground beef because the company was
in compliance with Directive 10010.1 and was performing their own
sampling.
• not to classify E. coli O157:H7 on beef trim as an "adulterant" violating
wholesome meat laws.xii
• to allow 16 square inches of fecal contamination on carcasses....
• not to condemn product dropped on the floor because they could not “prove”
the product fell on a pathogen.
• to accept a one percent positive rate for E. coli O157:H7 as “baseline” and
acceptable....
FSIS smashed anyone who challenged its efforts to protect ConAgra from accountability, not just Mr. Munsell. After Mr. Smith took charge of the Munsell dispute from Washington, every official was moved off the job who blew the whistle internally on harassment of MQF, or who sought accountability from ConAgra. The harassment victims ranged from inspectors to supervisory vets. In some instances the agency simply isolated them from the case. Numerous whistleblowers have reported that the Inspector General staff’s primary interest was to attack the critics, while discouraging or only grudgingly accepting evidence of agency misconduct to shield ConAgra. Agency management forced some of the agency’s most seasoned veterinarians out of the government through steady harassment.
This treatment is consistent with a wide ranging phenomenon since new Labor Management chief William Milton purged the long time career staff of that office, who had earned respect over the years even from critics for objective, constructive resolution in retaliation cases. Leaders from professional organizations and unions alike now express no expectation of fair play within the agency personnel system, claiming that the merit system has been replaced with a reign of terror at FSIS. www.whistleblower.org...
Texas Animal Health Commission 2009 report
..new disease challenges are emerging. Some are domestic diseases that are increasing in significance. Others are foreign diseases that may be imported as result of the exponential increases in international importations of animals and animal products. Our industries and our economy are threatened by diseases and pests that heretofore we only read about in disease text books... www.tahc.state.tx.us...
Originally posted by queenofsheba
reply to post by Partygirl
Shrinking porportions for sure! I just bought some Bomb Pops, well now they're called "American Pops." The red, white and blue frozen treat...and my hubby was like, "I remember when these things were bigger than my hand." I said, "Yeah, I know darlin', times are changin'." They have raised prices but I think they've reduced portion sizes more and not raised prices so drastically, so by the time they do, we'll be conditioned for what we get. Although, I must add, do we really need the cookies and treats the size of our hands?
Originally posted by jibeho
reply to post by Partygirl
I'd like to know who is buying groceries for the 4% who are just oblivious to the clear increase in price across the board.
Furthermore, I'd love to do more reading on the the ever shrinking quantities of products sold compared to the increase in prices. Pay more and get less and forces you to head back to the store just a little sooner especially with breakfast cereal. Big box/Same box only with a smaller bag inside.
Ramen Noodles anyone???