It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Like the airforce photo lab technician that was witnessing bases on the moon???
Originally posted by 1questioner
reply to post by CrashRetrieval
I have been researching the UFO phenomenon for many years. After reading and hearing from military pilots, military radar operators, all types of military personnel from Generals to security people, from civilian pilots, civilian radar operators and astronauts to local police, I believe we have been and are currently being visited by extraterrestrial intelligent beings. To dismiss all the reports and statements of the above mentioned individuals as liars, hoaxers, or individuals unable to distinguish fantasy from reality, is in my opinion a condemnation of the human race. If we can't trust these people to be telling us the truth, who can we trust?
Originally posted by venatorX
Originally posted by 1questioner
reply to post by CrashRetrieval
I have been researching the UFO phenomenon for many years. After reading and hearing from military pilots, military radar operators, all types of military personnel from Generals to security people, from civilian pilots, civilian radar operators and astronauts to local police, I believe we have been and are currently being visited by extraterrestrial intelligent beings. To dismiss all the reports and statements of the above mentioned individuals as liars, hoaxers, or individuals unable to distinguish fantasy from reality, is in my opinion a condemnation of the human race. If we can't trust these people to be telling us the truth, who can we trust?
A simple and brilliant post. Who can you trust? After a similar contextual number of years of sincere interest, I understand full well that when it all comes down to "trust", there is no knowledge present to prevent such a convention as "trust". Do not think of this as condemning my friend. Think of this as rule one of survival itself.
Remember, no matter how intelligent, no matter how well trained, when confronted with something that so jars our central perspective, our natural reaction is to mentally "fill in the blanks". Why? Because our supreme function in mission is to survive. That is law one and our status is maintained by such. The mind will literally formulate perceptive, contextualized reality to keep from making itself vulnerable to an attack or perceived state of confusion that would render it imminently threatened.
When the aliens come and speak with you directly you will no longer need the convention of trust. Until then, enjoy the entertainment and trust NO ONE. This is the only logical stance an honest man can take when considering an interest where trust is a mandate and not a ready commodity.
Be aware that there are species however that will chase their tails until they fall over in their tracks from exhaustion. Who has condemned their humanity? All we have is survival friend.edit on 12-8-2011 by venatorX because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Blue Shift
It isn't worth anything without the accompanying photo, memo, piece of metal, or whatever.
In the military, they used to call it "scuttlebutt." Wild rumors about crazy stuff happening, spreading through the ranks, with nothing to support it. And upper level military types aren't immune to it.
Unless they got the goods, all they have is an unverified opinion.
Originally posted by simone50m
When I was in the service, we were briefed about the nature of intelligence, they called "bits and pieces". The intelligence community analysts take those and put the puzzle together, to form a picture for them.
It seems to me, like ufologists want a military officer to walk out on the Exopolitics holding hands with a Grey EBEN.
I had something happen to me in the service, ufo related, but it doesn't give the agendized ufologists, what they WANT. It just a bit. Have all kinds of hard documentation on it too, but it's more like a scary conspiracy story, than an answer to Cosmic Questions.
It was traumatic, too. By the way. Actually, my life was on the line.
So, over the years, the reactions to me by ufologists, has been, everything ranging from silence, to dismissive, to warning off. A couple days ago, I asked a friend one, "All this time later, what do you make of my past, presently." He said I need to get over it, and move on, along with an insult thats too involved to explain here and now.
edit on 12-8-2011 by simone50m because: edit
Originally posted by simone50m
reply to post by smallcheese
Thanks cheese. I have --never-- posted my story here on ATS. I'm afraid that people will immediately ask me to put up pictures of documents, my DD214 and stuff, and I do not own printer/scanner/copier/faxer equipment, just only my humble lil interwebs box. (I really need to upgrade. My -excuse- is, I'm waiting for the hot humid weather to subside.)
The incident/experience is no soundbite, to say the very very least. Actually, I began telling my stories, and was going to put such in the Stories forum, from like a thirdhand account, so as to not come out like, "Here is what happened to me all you Skeptics, have at it." I made the mistake of sorta.....doing that over on a forum/website which presents as ufos/paranormal, but all the members/regulars are a -gang- of aggressive debunkers. They ganged up on me, and shredded at me and made threats, which caused me to react/become physically ill, because I live with ptsd like symptoms already. Maybe I'll proceed with my Story Forum idea, and see what people's reaction is, then.
Lastly, It is difficult to establish to everyone, that I'm not pushing a big disclosure truth, a smoking gun, and I especially don't have what they "WANT". All I have is a "bit" of the big puzzle, and I don't know even, how much of a good contribution it even is.
I have seen what you have gone through and can empathize from both sides of the fence
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by gortex
Yes. Tehran is in interesting case.
But it is not insider information. It is not "disclosure".