It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by James the Lesser Again, the onl;y people who support the draft are the ones who are not affected by it.
Originally posted by American Mad Man
Originally posted by James the Lesser Again, the onl;y people who support the draft are the ones who are not affected by it.
I for one am FOR a draft, and I am in my early 20's, and thus among those most likely to get drafted. Why you ask? Well, first off, if we need the troops then we need them - it's as simple as that. I also believe it would be good for much of the population at large - it would give people a lot of skills, cut down on the obesity that keeps getting pegged on the US public. Also, there are many countries on earth where millitary service is required, and it hasn't hurt them. It would also toughen up a frankly soft America. Plus, what is so wrong with serving your country when it needs you? I say if we need troops, and can't recruit enough of them, then draft them.
Now before you blast me and say that I should join the millitary, I plan to when I am done school. I also understand that this is a free country, and any people either objet to the war or millitary service in general. This is why there won't be a draft, and why no politician in his right mind would implement a draft - it would be career suicide.
Overall though, I think a draft could be a good thing.
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
Briefly stated, there are at least four exceptional reasons for mandatory military service of at least two years of active duty or a Reserve or NG equivalent.
1. It requires all able-bodied men to serve their country and thereby have a personal stake in the cause of freedom.
2. You have a populations of men who are already trained in the event of a national emergency.
3. The society benefits from having a population of men who have benefited from the discipline and sacrifice inherent in military service.
4. The military would have to depend less on women, thus enabling the military to raise physical standards and freeing more women for essental non-miliatary roles at home in the case of mass mobilization.
Originally posted by James the Lesser
Well, if this was like WWII then I wouldn't mind being drafted either, but this is another Vietnam, which is something Bush has no clue about because he never went to war or reads.
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Just a Cheney fact for everyone ... he is AGAINST the constitutional amendment that described marriage as being for a man and a woman only.