It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I stand corrected. He is actually a marxist-leninist.
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
But see, that is the problem. Obama is not a 'Maoist',
I am talking about barrack obama the current occupier of the white house. Who are you talking about?
Originally posted by incrediblelousmindsTo constantly refer to Obama as a radical leftist who wants to tax us all to death is an incredibly absurd argument not supported by the facts.
OMG!!! He could only be described as "moderate" in comparison to Stalin, or Mao, or Hitler. In comparison to any American president, he represents the far, far, far left. As far as "republican", even the current crop of rinos "representing us" are not as left wing as he is.
Originally posted by incrediblelousmindsHe is a moderate at best, and resembles a Republican FAR more than any of the Nation's traditional leftists.
Nice shot at disinformation. Those services are handled the local level and have nothing to do with the federal government, YET.
Originally posted by DZAG Wright
Could 80% of Americans support a tax hike because about 80% of Americans wouldn't know what to do if their way of life changed?
I'd say that at least 80% of America would poop themselves if things our tax dollars pay for were removed such as garbage collection, police monitoring, fire departments, roads fall apart, etc..
Originally posted by sonofliberty1776
Originally posted by incrediblelousmindsHe is a moderate at best, and resembles a Republican FAR more than any of the Nation's traditional leftists.
OMG!!! He could only be described as "moderate" in comparison to Stalin, or Mao, or Hitler. In comparison to any American president, he represents the far, far, far left.
Originally posted by jimmyx
could someone actually show WHAT taxes have been raised by Obama? mine have been lowered since he has been in office. just because you have an opinion doesn't make it a fact.
Keep in mind that Mr. Obama has already signed the largest tax increase since 1993. While everyone focuses on the Bush tax rates that expire after 2012, other tax increases are already set to hit the economy thanks to the 2010 Affordable Care Act. As a refresher, here s a non-exhaustive list of ObamaCare’s tax increases:
* Starting in 2013, the bill adds an additional 0.9% to the 2.9% Medicare tax for singles who earn more than $200,000 and couples making more than $250,000.
* For first time, the bill also applies Medicare’s 2.9% payroll tax rate to investment income, including dividends, interest income and capital gains. Added to the 0.9% payroll surcharge, that means a 3.8-percentage point tax hike on “the rich.” Oh, and these new taxes aren’t indexed for inflation, so many middle-class families will soon be considered rich and pay the surcharge as their incomes rise past $250,000 due to tax-bracket creep. Remember how the Alternative Minimum Tax was supposed to apply only to a handful of millionaires?
Taxpayer cost over 10 years: $210 billion.
* Also starting in 2013 is a 2.3% excise tax on medical device manufacturers and importers. That’s estimated to raise $20 billion.
* Already underway this year is the new annual fee on “branded” drug makers and importers, which will raise $27 billion.
* Another $15.2 billion will come from raising the floor on allowable medical deductions to 10% of adjusted gross income from 7.5%.
* Starting in 2018, the bill imposes a whopping 40% “excise tax” on high-cost health insurance plans. Though it only applies to two years in the 2010-2019 window of ObamaCare’s original budget score, this tax would still raise $32 billion – and much more in future years.
* And don’t forget a new annual fee on health insurance providers starting in 2014 and estimated to raise $60 billion. This tax, like many others on this list, will be passed along to consumers in higher health-care costs.
There are numerous other new taxes in the bill, all adding up to some $438 billion in new revenue over 10 years. But even that is understated because by 2019 the annual revenue increase is nearly $90 billion, or $900 billion in the 10 years after that. Yet Mr. Obama wants to add another $1 trillion in new taxes on top of this.
The economic ironies are also, well, rich. Mr. Obama is now pushing to reduce the payroll tax by two-percentage points for another year to boost the economy, but he’s already built in a big increase in that same payroll tax for 2013. So if a payroll tax cut creates jobs this year, why doesn’t a payroll tax increase destroy jobs after 2013?
He could only be described as "moderate" in comparison to Stalin, or Mao, or Hitler. In comparison to any American president, he represents the far, far, far left. As far as "republican", even the current crop of rinos "representing us" are not as left wing as he is.
Originally posted by wcitizen
whatreallyhappened.com...
snip
But I felt it was my duty to send you this open letter correcting what appear to be several misperceptions you have regarding the present situation and how We The People truly feel about it.
It is implied by the social contract where a government's right to govern is given by the consent of the governed.
This is a great idea. I will also write a letter indicating the same. Anybody else?
Originally posted by Rockdisjoint
It is time to face the fact that under the present private-central banking system that loans the public currency at interest, that the government debt crisis is intentional and by design unpayable.
The Fed isn't private, it's quasi-private and all of the Feds profits are returned to the U.S Treasury. If you guys dislike the Federal reserve system just because you believe it to be ``private``, then you too are part of the problem.
Originally posted by CasiusIgnoranze
reply to post by wcitizen
Unfortunately, letters like these never reach the eyes of the President because they are always "pre checked".
Originally posted by SG-17
Higher taxes in order to reduce the government's debt isn't the proposal. The proposal is to remove tax loopholes and tax breaks for corporations and the top 5% of wealthy Americans. Something that should have been done a long time ago. These people need to pay their fair share.
As paranoid as many working class conservatives can get (which is an oxymoron, its the same as a chicken lying in bed with Colonel Sanders) bigger government, when implemented properly, can do wonders for the people. Bigger government and a united, world, government is the path that we are on right now and that will not change.edit on 7/28/2011 by SG-17 because: (no reason given)