It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Libya mission about oil, arms

page: 1
3

log in

join
share:

posted on Jul, 25 2011 @ 04:26 PM
link   
Arms And Oil

This is an excellent article by our Canadian Scott Taylor who has been covering Libya for quite a while now



The first signs of unrest in Libya erupted in the form of violent protests in mid-February. After seizing weapons and military equipment from Libyan soldiers, the protesters quickly became full-fledged rebels.





His threat of reprisals against the citizens of Benghazi prompted the UN Security Council to approve Resolution 1979, authorizing a "no-fly zone" over Libyan skies. The intent was to prevent Gadhafi from using his air force to punish innocent citizens. The ink on the UN resolution was still damp when NATO eagerly accepted command and control of its enforcement.






key NATO belligerents, such as France and the U.K., have formally recognized the rebel leadership in Benghazi as the official representatives of Libya, even through they control just a small holding in eastern Libya.






This will no doubt come as a shock to those who thought our intervention in Libya was about human rights and democracy. Seems it’s about arms sales and oil.



And as a member of ATS put it this all about



its called kill everyone who gets in the way and pay a bunch of mercenaries to do it for you that way you can hide behind them



Remember the first signs of unrest in Libya erupted in the form of violent protests in mid-February. Then these Protesters somehow stole weapons from the Libyan soldiers.


Now let me explain why is the Syrian government succeeding in the crackdown the of opposition? is it morale? or Command And Control? or maybe a little of both.

An government official on CNN have stated that Assad will succeed in the crackdown unlike Gadaffi.



And the reason that the Gadaffi is unsuccessful in the crackdown is because of the military is outdated, out tech compare to the east libyan mercenaries who are getting the new least weaponry from NATO and note these new weapons that the rebels are using are NATOs own weapons, not your simple weapons from Russia or china.

edit on 25-7-2011 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)




posted on Jul, 25 2011 @ 04:36 PM
link   
the proxy wars of the early 2010's, started by the elite to control the illusion peak of oil, thus saving the bastion of greed that is the US dollar, lasted only a few years.

as predicted by nostradamus, the Libyan's united, repelling the attack and with the backing of their new found communist allies wipe italy of the face of the map and carve southern France a new ring piece!



posted on Jul, 25 2011 @ 06:55 PM
link   


The first signs of unrest in Libya erupted in the form of violent protests in mid-February. After seizing weapons and military equipment from Libyan soldiers


Sounds like a commando raid too me and that would be a MOSSAD/CIA raid to be more precise.

Have you come across the saying about give them egnough rope and they will hang themselves ?

Well Russia Today started to ring the bell and so many people have followed the lead that before this is all over some of them might just do that.

Anyone that didn't think something was wrong when our elected leaders (yeah i know) let the lockerby bomber out and then sold gaddffi tanks and sudenly wanted to invaded the country, who didn't hear a little bell ringing is far beyond any help i can offer them but don't feel alone because all of CNN/BBC/Fox/Murdock empier were just as death so maybe it's me with the problom
edit on 25-7-2011 by Master_007 because: i like to



posted on Jul, 25 2011 @ 07:27 PM
link   
The bleeding hearts will claim every single military action the west takes will be about oil and money. It is their sole purpose to try to convince people how evil the governments of the west are.

There never is nor will there ever be a justifiable reason for war for any of them.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 06:18 AM
link   
No, you are wrong.

It's about the fact that Gaddafi never borrowed money, GOLD was the Libyan currency (at heart).

The rebels are ALREADY trying to borrow from the IMF in anticipation of victory, a victory that is assured by loans. And since the IMF now has an interest in protecting their investment, the NATO support will continue.

It all goes towards weapons anyhow.

But watch how quickly a new Libyan central bank is established. Same MO for Iraq, Saddam used GOLD.

Of course, a man with his own gold will never be your slave. A country whose military leaders are indebted to the IMF will ALWAYS be your slaves.



posted on Jul, 26 2011 @ 06:35 AM
link   
reply to post by harryhaller
 


This man seems to have hit the nail, sure its about stealing there oil and there gold, but its also about getting the country into massive debt, so they will be slave countries ready for the overlords to march in and be the 'saviours', Like the rest of the world.



posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 12:23 AM
link   
reply to post by Vanishr
 






but its also about getting the country into massive debt, so they will be slave countries ready for the overlords to march in and be the 'saviours', Like the rest of the world.

correct and once again libya will face another rounds of protests and possibly return of another revolution



posted on Jul, 27 2011 @ 12:23 AM
link   
Sorry i did clicked once.
Mods please remove this post, thanks.
edit on 27-7-2011 by Agent_USA_Supporter because: (no reason given)



new topics

top topics



 
3

log in

join