It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Thats WAS a great summation....No one truly knows,or will ever know,sans some deathbed confession or discovered writings,who it was...
Originally posted by DeKalb
reply to post by Nola213
"But the one thing I don't like is people on certain boards claiming or thinking in thier mind that they know for 100% certainty that person X is not the Zodiac, and person Y is a 98% match for the Zodiac. It's ludicrous. "...well stated...thank you
Originally posted by ozmaoz47
reply to post by AQuestion
i've noticed that the police will "decide" who is guilty and then all the evidence collected is used to support their decision.
Originally posted by StealthyKat
reply to post by MelodyWall
Who will you have doing the independent analysis? I know the police do have DNA from the crime scenes, so if you can supply DNA, it would rule the person in or out. I can tell you why police kind of brush things off....first, the SanFran police are no longer investigating Zodiac (which I do not agree with because I think he's still alive). But the main thing is just that whenever there is a high profile case, it brings out all the crackpots. They get hundreds of call from people saying their next door nieghbor is the perp, or that they themselves commited the crime. Why people do this I'll never know. It doesn't excuse them not taking each tip seriously, but that's what happens. That's why you have to be relentless. But after a while, they get very cynical....especially one this cold. That's why you have to be relentless. If you truly believe this person has commited crimes, forget the internet and gather all your evidence...then call the police every hour until someone will listen. Bring your evidence to the police. Make them so sick of you that they will see you just to shut you up Doing an independent analysis may not be too good of an idea though. The reason being that they can say the specimen has been contaminated, since it was handled by someone other that law enforcement (especially if it ever went to trial....there's your reasonable doubt). Also you have to be sure that there is enough DNA for multiple testing.
.
Originally posted by StealthyKat
Well, I sincerely wish you luck I am so curious about the audio you mentioned. Did you mean it's recorded during the crime? Or is it just him admitting to something?