It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
(visit the link for the full news article)
The head of the U.S. Transportation Security Administration said Thursday the agency planned to enhance identity-based, preflight screening capabilities.
"These improvements will enable our officers to focus their efforts on higher risk areas," TSA Administrator John S. Pistole said in Washington. "Enhancing identity-based screening is another common sense step in the right direction as we continue to strengthen overall security, and improve the passenger experience whenever possible."
For $179 a year, Clear members submit biometric information and use a kiosk that checks fingerprints and irises to determine their identity. From there, the traveler heads to the screening, bypassing long waits.
The move was cheered by the U.S. Travel Association, which has lobbied for a trusted traveler program. A survey commissioned by the travel and tourism trade group said 61 percent of frequent leisure travelers and 75 percent of frequent business travelers would join a program that provided an easier experience at the airport in exchange for a fee up to $150 and background check.
During the first phase, some frequent fliers and members of CBP's Trusted Traveler programs, including members of Global Entry, SENTRI and NEXUS, who are U.S. citizens might qualify for expedited screening at select checkpoints at certain airports.
As many as 2,000 passengers a day are expected to get expedited security screening at Miami International Airport starting this fall to test a new TSA program. Read more: www.miamiherald.com...
Originally posted by vjr1113
ah there's the true motive, money. of course, they're a business.
we need some kind of flight revolution, i would suggest that everyone fly local when they can. there are many amateur and experienced pilots willing to make some extra money.
Originally posted by Q:1984A:1776
So the terrorists are more likely to use an ancient old woman's adult diaper or the underwear of a small child for an attack than the possessions of random frequent fliers? These are the people in charge of our "security". What a joke.
Originally posted by jude11
It's always about the money and of course allowing those with it to be above the rest of us shmucks. Can't have them being treated like...ordinary.
Originally posted by vjr1113
ah there's the true motive, money. of course, they're a business.
we need some kind of flight revolution, i would suggest that everyone fly local when they can. there are many amateur and experienced pilots willing to make some extra money.
Imperial Jets private jet charter reports a 107% hike in inquiries for private jet travel after a CNBC feature reported how passengers were stranded across the globe after terrorist threat levels were set to high worldwide.
Airline passengers have been forced to wait three hours to be checked in in Europe, and there has been a 20% increase in baggage loss throughout the airlines. Travelers have been forced to ship their luggage through worldwide delivery services, and fly without their baggage. However, now travelers are skipping the hassle of flying on commercial airlines by chartering private jet travel services.
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by jude11
It's always about the money and of course allowing those with it to be above the rest of us shmucks. Can't have them being treated like...ordinary.
Oh good grief... if your a frequent flier then the fee is peanuts. Any idea how much radiation you get zapped with as a frequent flier from those machines? No? Well no one does...
If you fly once every few years... stand in line and take your groping like a man. The lines will be shorter anyway because I will have that "get out of grope free pass"
And face it, the rest of you schmucks ARE ordinary You can't even spell schmucks right
Sorry couldn't resistedit on 17-7-2011 by zorgon because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AnIntellectualRedneck
All I see is that a terrorist can bribe his way straight through security now. In the end, that's really what this comes down to. Of course, it's not really about terrorists, is it?
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by Q:1984A:1776
So the terrorists are more likely to use an ancient old woman's adult diaper or the underwear of a small child for an attack than the possessions of random frequent fliers? These are the people in charge of our "security". What a joke.
yeah they are
The shoe bomber
The panty bomber
In Vietnam women put bombs in baby carriages to get close to soldiers
A pre screen ID
ABOUT FRICKING TIME
Originally posted by zorgon
Originally posted by AnIntellectualRedneck
All I see is that a terrorist can bribe his way straight through security now. In the end, that's really what this comes down to. Of course, it's not really about terrorists, is it?
Of course it's not silly... its about control. A most wanted guy in Britain slipped through London's airport with eye makeup and a burka
Man dons burka to flee anti-terror police
www.thisislondon.co.uk...
TSA wouldn't target those here nor ask someone to unwrap a turban, would they?
Much safer to feel up and strip search children, old ladies and people in wheelchairs
But your right a terrorist could get pre checked then go strap on that bomb and walk right in Easy to find a willing bomber that has no previous record
edit on 17-7-2011 by zorgon because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Q:1984A:1776
Now we are trading our freedom for security, and getting neither. Who was it that said that is what would happen, and what we would deserve?