Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by Acharya
...and their so-called proof are often poor.
Then this pyramid is even less than poor. Nothing about it can be proved by anyone. It is a forgery just like the other objects allegedly recovered from the same site.
The mainstream would *have* to say that just because of the supposed age of the artefacts, the alternative would be to re write the history books. Archaeology is filled with evidence of much older items than can be explained, also geological proof like that of the age of the city Dwarka being much older than mainstream archaeologists claim. I'm not going to argue with you anymore, but if you truly want to open your mind, read a great book o the subject called Forbidden Archaeology.
Peace, out.

