It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ross 54
Have tried, in my time, to get the 'inside story' on a few projects, and failed, because, according to the scientific way of doing things, the time was not yet ripe for such a disclosure. That the saga of Frank Kimbler and his metal fragments has come under such scientific discipline, seems likely. If the evidence warrants careful, repeated vetting, and peer reviewed publication in a respected scientific journal, I dare say it will have been well worth waiting for. Ross
Maybe this will help to understand what efforts have been made and the results of those efforts...link...metal test
Originally posted by Ross 54
Difficult to say, really. We do not even know how long a new round of testing might have been going on. It's natural, of course, to want to have news of the results as soon as possible. One must also try to understand the position of any scientists who may have become involved. If they are to look seriously into the matter, and eventually publish their results, they do not want information of dubious merit leaking out in the meantime, creating a confused, sensational atmosphere. Actually, the longer the delay, the more likely something important has been found. As we often hear: extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Rossedit on 6-11-2011 by Ross 54 because: (no reason given)edit on 6-11-2011 by Ross 54 because: corrected word choice and punctuation
This is NOT about Roswell but the artifacts retrieved on the plains of San Augustine N.M and the lab analysis of those artifacts posted here....ufocrashbook.com...
Originally posted by maryhinge
reply to post by Ross 54
so after all these years people have scaned this area for 64 years
and found nothing then this come on im not mocking you but
dont believe everything you read
lets hope im proven wrong i hope so
EDIT:and im not a troll i would love this to be from outer space
more than anyone else as i have seen many unexplained sightings
day and night with family and friendsedit on 6/11/2011 by maryhinge because: (no reason given)
Thank you for your advice that I not believe everything I read. Actually, I don't, but its good advice, and bears repeating, especially on a website like this one. It's not yet clear whether Frank Kimbler has found something important or not. He freely admits as much. I assume that he is in earnest, and that a valid, scientifically respectable answer to that question is being sought. Impatience at delays built into the scientific process, or other emotional responses to the situation will not determine the outcome, here. Careful, unhurried scientific work will. Ross
Originally posted by maryhinge
reply to post by Ross 54
so after all these years people have scaned this area for 64 years
and found nothing then this come on im not mocking you but
dont believe everything you read
lets hope im proven wrong i hope so
EDIT:and im not a troll i would love this to be from outer space
more than anyone else as i have seen many unexplained sightings
day and night with family and friendsedit on 6/11/2011 by maryhinge because: (no reason given)
The Wade evidence from the plains of San Augustin, New Mexico needs to undergo the same process of independent verification and peer reviewed scientific publication as does Mr. Kimbler's. In either case, until we have that these, both are only interesting possibilities that might be so. Ross
Originally posted by meteorlima
Maybe this will help to understand what efforts have been made and the results of those efforts...link...metal test
Originally posted by Ross 54
Difficult to say, really. We do not even know how long a new round of testing might have been going on. It's natural, of course, to want to have news of the results as soon as possible. One must also try to understand the position of any scientists who may have become involved. If they are to look seriously into the matter, and eventually publish their results, they do not want information of dubious merit leaking out in the meantime, creating a confused, sensational atmosphere. Actually, the longer the delay, the more likely something important has been found. As we often hear: extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Rossedit on 6-11-2011 by Ross 54 because: (no reason given)edit on 6-11-2011 by Ross 54 because: corrected word choice and punctuation
Originally posted by Ross 54
Frank Kimbler reported some time ago that he'd received no interference from the government, in his quest to characterize the metal fragments he found. As far as I know, this is still the case. Assume that the metal he found might be of extraterrestrial origin. Further assume that the government is aware of this possibility. Does their failure to act against him suggest that they might now be willing to use such a discovery of an extraterrestrial artifact on Earth, as a means of advancing the disclosure process? Ross
Originally posted by Ross 54
...Assume that the metal he found might be of extraterrestrial origin.
Further assume that the government is aware of this possibility.
Does their failure to act against him suggest that they might now be willing to use such a discovery of an extraterrestrial artifact on Earth, as a means of advancing the disclosure process? Ross
Originally posted by Ross 54
Split Infinity; Thanks for your concern. I'm not familiar with any information connecting the metal fragments Frank Kimbler found, with bodily implants allegedly made during supposed 'alien abductions'. Anything that is thought to be known about such 'implants' can not, it seems, be automatically applied to every piece of possibly extraterrestrial metal. ********** You indicate that it is not intended or even possible that we can come to understand at least some aspects of whatever extraterrestrial presence may be at Earth. I doubt that, having some little evidence to the contrary, already. If one doesn't try to discover and understand evidence of an extraterrestrial presence, how can one know whether it is possible to do so? Ross
Originally posted by Ross 54
Split infinity; Sorry to cause you such distress. I'm always careful, but thanks for your concluding advise, anyway. I realize it's well meant. Perhaps the riddle of extraterrestrial life isn't really unsolvable, but merely requires a long, sustained effort. Being unable to predict the future, I can't say how long. For all I know, our best efforts could be about to break in upon some remarkable kernel of truth. Ross