It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mpeake
But ya know what.. Even if you plan to vote Bush, I would still urge you to go out and vote. Complacency is worse than defeate.
Absolutely!
Ya know, since I don't want either fellas, I too would love for this year to be a landslide. Either way doesn't matter to me, just so long as we don't have to deal with the fiasco we had last time. No more whining about dangling chads, or popular votes. One cleary defined leader may do us some good. Even if it's a boob like Kerry or Bush.
Originally posted by Deadallready
Never never neverrrrrrrrr, would I vote for Bush. I will never ever vote in this false voting system for anyone but, Definetly not Bonehead Bush. That is like continuing the rise of Hitler to the rise of The New Order. Prescot to George, Notttt...
Originally posted by AntiPolitrix
I have few problems with Bush like stem cell reseach, gay marriage, and border patrol but the war on terror isn't one of those.
Im will vote for Bush because we need to stomp these terrorist like roaches.
I just don't think Kerry will fight a smarter, more sensitive war on terror (whatever that means).
No one has givin me any reason to back them so i will vote for the Same.
This is not a time for change, especially with the choses we have. just my opinion.
Originally posted by MrJingles
Obviously its a problem with strategy, we should have won this thing a long time ago. Its time to change strategies, Kerry 2004!
Originally posted by Aelita
Please try to concentrate and tell us how well he is doing in the "war on terror". As is evident from all the news sources, Al Qaeda is doing quite well after almost 3 years of being supposedly hunted high and low. The alert that came out 2 weeks ago is the best evidence of that.
They lost little capability. Why? Because the resources were squandered on the unnecessary (but rich with PR potential) war with Iraq, a country that posed no threat at all to the United States.
Hahahaha wake up. Bush is busy propping his flagging polls, he needs the public (like you) to be scared and vote for him.
Maybe he won't invade another country for the PR value. That in itself would be very good.
Because of lack of imagination? Sameness, sameness is your refuge.
Kerry is not likeable, but one has to think beyond that.
America is now taking the toxic drug of GW Bush, and if we switch to placebo, that in itself would be a great deal.
How about cutting the criminally high budget deficit? Ending irresponsible tax cuts? Lack of funds has real and lethal effect on every facet of American life. Do you care at all?
Au contraire, mon ami, the time is ripe for change. It's time to end the ridiculous rule of the Dumb and the Greedy.
Peace.
Originally posted by AntiPolitrix
Al Qaeda has been knocked off their feet for now but they will be back.
The US still has troops in Vietnam, Germany, Japan and other countries so quit talking like the terrorist should be dead by now.
Are you ignorant or are you just trying to get people worked up?
haha..ok Aelita, Iraq did pose a threat to the United States. Iraq might not of posed a direct threat like Iraq sending troops to the US but they did pose a threat. Saddam admitted he had chemical weapons after the first gulf war and he did not show proof he had destroyed them like the UN (joke!!!) had requested.
Saddam could of easily provided a group like Al Qaeda with chemicals that could be used in a attack on the US.
Oh, hey Aelita, where did Al Qaeda members run and hide after we took out their headquarters in Afghganistan, they went to Iraq!!! And i stand by my next statement!!!
How would a terrorist attack help Bush?
By "invading" Iraq we have freed millions of Iraqis who in the past 20 years have seen their friends and family murdered in cold blood by the hunfrds of thousands.
Yes you do, you have to think beyond your blinding hatred for Bush. Imagination? You have an imagination?
If G.W.Bush is a drug, i don't want to come down.
And about the tax cuts, im not sure what kind of money you make but i want as much tax money back as i can get. These "irresponsible tax cuts" put a couple hundred bucks back in my pocket.
Yes i do care, that is why i want MY tax money back so that i can spend it where and how i want.
If G.W. wins he could pretty much do what ever he wants.
Originally posted by AntiPolitrix
Then again, i was born and raised in the USA so i don't have a clue whether or not i would agree to your example. I say yes but i haven't been held hostage in my own country.
Originally posted by Aelita
Originally posted by AntiPolitrix
The US still has troops in Vietnam, Germany, Japan and other countries so quit talking like the terrorist should be dead by now.
US troops left Vietnam on the struts of helicopters at the end of the war in that country. Are saying the US troops are still stationed there? Please comment.