It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

weather modifacation does exist...

page: 3
5
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 15 2011 @ 07:58 PM
link   
There was speculation in Russia last year.
I am quoting the ATS thread but there you find the Russian page too.
www.abovetopsecret.com...




posted on Jun, 15 2011 @ 08:00 PM
link   
reply to post by Kokatsi
 


There's plenty of info in HAARP out there - start with the wiki article, go see what the HF band is used for and what eth ionosphere actually does - there's a very brief outline in my post above.

en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...
en.wikipedia.org...

Eg the ionosphere is still very important for over-the-horizon radar - sometimes called "anti-stealth" radar - and for long range radio communications not dependant on satellites - those 2 things alone seem quite sufficient to explain military interest.



posted on Jun, 15 2011 @ 08:23 PM
link   
reply to post by Kokatsi
 

HAARP is not secret.

Scientific results are plentiful. Here is a start.
www2.gi.alaska.edu...

The military is not just interested in weapons. Communications and surveillance are of great interest. So is protecting satellites from solar activity. Research at HAARP can be used for these things. It is also not very expensive compared to other things the military spends money on.

Heating the ionosphere allows it (and the magnetosphere) to be studied. There is much to be learned about how both are affected by solar activity.



edit on 6/15/2011 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Jun, 16 2011 @ 08:29 AM
link   
Whether secrets or adverse biological effects exist or not remains to be proven.
I have a distant relative that works at a highly secret corporation in developing new radar and cell technology for the US military. And he says otherwise. It is not a question that this entire facet of technology is full of secrets kept from the public - it is a simple fact stated by people who work there.

Now I've known this guy for close to 11 years. For six of these he would not even make a hint of the nature of his work except the general field.
Around 2002 he still called me a nutty conspiracy theorist simply because I maintained that too many mobile masts and cell phones were bad for our health.
A few years later he said that "of course" they were bad for your health.

Now I used to live at an area in the US where military radar was beamed all over the world. In about 2 years my vision was pretty much screwed up. For a while we thought radioactivity was the culprit since the area was full of it (way over the health limit but if you showed up with a GM counter on the main square, the Navy was paying you a visit within 24 hours.) The eye specialist who examined me said he would never sleep in the area he would just came in for professional visits. And he named the radar towers.

As soon as I moved out, the decay of my eyesight by thousands of floaters simply stopped.

Now I wonder how public this information is. The town was full of very nervous, sick people, the military personnel kept rotating every two years.



posted on Jun, 16 2011 @ 09:20 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kokatsi
Now I used to live at an area in the US where military radar was beamed all over the world. In about 2 years my vision was pretty much screwed up. For a while we thought radioactivity was the culprit since the area was full of it (way over the health limit but if you showed up with a GM counter on the main square, the Navy was paying you a visit within 24 hours.) The eye specialist who examined me said he would never sleep in the area he would just came in for professional visits. And he named the radar towers.


Why don't you name the town, so your story can be verified.



posted on Jun, 16 2011 @ 07:54 PM
link   

Originally posted by Uncinus

Originally posted by Kokatsi
Now I used to live at an area in the US where military radar was beamed all over the world. In about 2 years my vision was pretty much screwed up. For a while we thought radioactivity was the culprit since the area was full of it (way over the health limit but if you showed up with a GM counter on the main square, the Navy was paying you a visit within 24 hours.) The eye specialist who examined me said he would never sleep in the area he would just came in for professional visits. And he named the radar towers.


Why don't you name the town, so your story can be verified.

It's Norfolk, VA. Built pretty much together with Portsmouth, VA and Virginia Beach, VA.



posted on Jun, 16 2011 @ 08:00 PM
link   
A coiuple times during the eighties, near-illiterate folks got jobs on the shipyard. And when they were told to let the coolant off to the Chesapeake Bay, they let the INNER coolant off instead of the outer one. Background radiation grew to four times as much as ws allowed by tha national max standards.











edit on 6/16/2011 by Kokatsi because: spelling



posted on Jun, 19 2011 @ 11:41 PM
link   
actually...

the day i posted this video..

i was going to edit more info in..


but a storm hit and we lost power for a while..

so i apologize for not adding more info at the time..

still a good video though..



posted on Jun, 23 2011 @ 01:27 AM
link   
sure chinnese gov, can control the weather

Mod Note: One Line Post – Please Review This Link.

edit on 23-6-2011 by Gemwolf because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 8 2011 @ 08:53 PM
link   
reply to post by Essan
 


Another recent news post ( hisz.rsoe.hu... )
stated the following : Environment Canada issued a tornado warning for the Sundre area in Mountain View County at 4:49 p.m. Thursday after a pilot doing weather modification over crops near the community of Bergen reported seeing a brief tornado touch down nine minutes earlier.

Uh..., to me it seemed to raise more questions than it answers-- Pilot doing weather modification?? Did s/he cause t and/or keep modifying weather after seeing the tornado? Why wait nine minutes???



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 07:12 AM
link   
reply to post by ovumcranium
 


There was no 9 minute "wait" - it was 9 minutes from the time the pilot saw the tornado until Environment Canada issued the warning, which seems like a very short time - he'd have to contact either ATC or his company, who would then contact EC (I presume), who would then draft the warning & get it out on the media airwaves.

Why was he cloud seeding then? Probably because the type of cloud was conducive to it - and apparently also conducive to an isolated tornado.

We had a tornado here today - about 50km away - but no cloud seeding - just thunderstorms!



posted on Jul, 9 2011 @ 02:28 PM
link   

Originally posted by ovumcranium
reply to post by Essan
 


Another recent news post ( hisz.rsoe.hu... )
stated the following : Environment Canada issued a tornado warning for the Sundre area in Mountain View County at 4:49 p.m. Thursday after a pilot doing weather modification over crops near the community of Bergen reported seeing a brief tornado touch down nine minutes earlier.

Uh..., to me it seemed to raise more questions than it answers-- Pilot doing weather modification?? Did s/he cause t and/or keep modifying weather after seeing the tornado? Why wait nine minutes???


Because it was a hail suppression mission, and seeding it with silver iodide did nothing to create the storm or tornado. On some cloud seeding projects that are strictly rainfall only, they may suspend seeding on a particular storm when the rainfall is very intense, the one in Canada is all about trying to mitigate hail damage.

There was a severe thunderstorm watch forecast for the day, before any clouds had even appeared yet. The meterologists knew yesterday up there had all the ingredients to have very severe weather. That storm hit 50k feet too..







 
5
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join