It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by The Sword
To be fair, these people are DESTROYING entire mountains just for coal!
That is greed, plain and simple!
And the people who work for them will suffer for years from miner's lung and other ailments.
Good riddance to coal.
What's so sacred about a mountain? Most coal operations are in lower altitudes than mountains; it's more like foothills. And the landscape is restored.
And Black Lung disease is down about 90% in the past 40 yrs since new safety laws have been passed.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by The Sword
WAKE UP, fool!
You're being played by the right on this debate.
Look at the greed that goes into extracting this coal.
Do you really support destroying entire mountaintops for coal?
I'm not being played, I'm just not a tree-hugging liberal like you. Greed. What's that about? Our nation - and the world - relies on coal to power many things. So stop being so dramatic and socialistic.
Greed. You mean profit, don't you? And to a marxist, profit is a dirty word. Time to grow up, bunky. Solar power just doesn't make the grade in the real world...
The daily stream of toxic nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds flowing from the plant would contribute to the formation of ground level ozone.
These pollutants are known to contribute to asthma and chronic bronchitis, increased heart rhythm irregularities, chest pain episodes and fatal heart attacks. In addition, the particulates emitted by the facility are linked with low birth weight and preterm births that can lead to other health problems and development delays in the first year of life.
And of real concern to parents would be the large volumes of mercury that plant would release into the air and waterways of Virginia.
On May 23, 2011, the Chesapeake Bay Foundation released a report, "A Coal Plant's Drain on Health and Wealth," stating that pollution from the $6 billion proposed plant would cause an estimated 26 premature deaths annually and generate additional regional health costs exceeding $200 million a year, as well as threaten safe drinking water in south Hampton Roads.
According to the report, soot particles are projected to cause about 442 asthma attacks a year, and the plant would emit thousands of pounds of pollutants each year, such as benzene and arsenic, which the EPA classifies as carcinogens
Originally posted by mishigas
In what would likely be a devastating blow to the local economy and everyone's electric bill, AEP says it would have to shut down 5 plants in our area and make cutbacks at six others to comply with new federal rules proposed for coal-fired power plants.
The United States Justice Department filed a lawsuit on November 3, 1999, against AEP and six other companies for violating the Clean Air Act. On October 8, 2007, AEP agreed to install US$4.6 billion in equipment to reduce emission, as well as pay a US$15 million civil fine. The company will cut 813,000 tons of air pollutants annually once all of the controls are installed.[16] According to the press release, the agreement imposes caps on emissions of pollutants from 16 plants located in five states. The facilities are located in Moundsville (2 facilities), St. Albans, Glasgow, and New Haven (2 facilities), West Virginia; Louisa, Kentucky; Glen Lyn and Carbo, Virginia; Brilliant, Conesville, Cheshire, Lockbourne, and Beverly, Ohio; and Rockport and Lawrenceburg, Indiana.
AEP's political action committee, the American Electric Power Committee for Responsible Government, has increased spending since the 1998 election cycle, reaching $1.4 million in contributions in 2007-2008, 57 percent to Republicans.[17] Also in 2008, American Electric Power significantly increased lobbying expenditures from less than $2 million a year to over $11 million, as climate legislation became a key issue in Washington.[18]
In 2009, AEP CEO Michael Morris contributed $100,000 to Newt Gingrich's American Solutions for Winning the Future, which supports increased oil drilling and opposes mandatory limits on greenhouse gas pollution.[19] American Electric Power is also a member of the American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, a lobbying and marketing organization which opposes President Obama's climate and clean energy legislation.[20]
Originally posted by mishigas
Thanks Obama - this is one of your campaign promises that you kept. Destroying jobs, raising taxes.
W. Virginia is not exactly the richest nation in the US. This will be a devastating blow to them.
In what would likely be a devastating blow to the local economy and everyone's electric bill, AEP says it would have to shut down 5 plants in our area and make cutbacks at six others to comply with new federal rules proposed for coal-fired power plants.
The plan being considered by the EPA would lead to a net loss of 600 jobs at the plants, three of which are in West Virginia-- in Glasgow, New Haven, and Moundsville.
The EPA wants to see these plants phased out by the end of 2014. A timeframe that AEP spokesman Phil Moye says unfairly puts a burden on not just employees but consumers. Rates are expected to shoot up when these plants close. West Virginians would see an increase of 10 to 15 percent , consumers in Kentucky could see up to a 35 percent increase. Employees are hoping the EPA will extend the deadline for a complete shutdown.
The EPA plan also calls for the upgrading or installation of new advanced emissions reduction equipment, and the transfer of coal-fueled generation into natural gas capacity. The deadline imposed by the EPA is December 31st, 2014. AEP is hoping that deadline is extended until at least 2018 possibly 2020.
Coal Plants to Shutdown