It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
post removed by staff
in a way this is so stupid...
the coal is there!!! how far would they have to import oil to burn to generate electricity!!
any excess pollution that is resulting from the fact that they are burning coal more than likely is offset by the fact that it is traveling a short distance to get to the plant!!!
and ya, there may be geothermal or alternatives, but are they developed enough to take up the slack of the plant (I believe it's only one closing, could be wrong there)?? I doubt it, and I doubt if there will be an alternative anytime in the future.
and the sad fact is, alot, I am tempted to say most, of our electricity in the US is powered by coal!!!
In my opinion, West virginia should be exempt, since like I said, there is probably less pollution involved when you take into accout that the alternatives either aren't available (wind, geothermal, ect), or well, will need to be transported and thus will create more pollution in totality!
the only ones who I would listen to as far as gripes about our using coal are the people living in the region who are having their mountains blown up and boulders raining down around them!!! they have a valid gripe, they are being poisoned!!!
In terms of human health, the report estimates $74.6 billion a year in public health burdens in Appalachian communities, with a majority of the impact resulting from increased healthcare costs, injury and death. Emissions of air pollution and coal account for $187.5 billion, mercury impacts as high as $29.3 billion, and climate contributions from combustion between $61.7 and $205.8 billion. Heavy metal toxins and carcinogens released during processing pollute water and food sources and are linked to long-term health problems. Mining, transportation, and combustion of coal contribute to poor air quality and respiratory disease, while the risky nature of mining coal results in death and injury for workers.
It is cheap, there is an abundance of it, it is easily transportable...
Oil and gas garnered 60 percent of an estimated total of $725 billion in federal assistance between 1950 and 2003, with oil alone taking 46% of the total. Coal took 13 percent. Next was hydroelectric at 11 percent and nuclear at 9 percent, not counting the liability cap subsidy which is an implicit avoided cost and impossible to quantify. At the back of the pack are wind, solar, geothermal, and bio-fuels, recipients of only 6 percent of total energy sector spending during this period.
Why is coal so 'cheap'? Could it be the hundreds of billions of dollars the federal government gives to the industry each year? Probably! Don't like it? Buy a heat pump and some solar panels. Then you don't have to pay some corporate fat cat your hard earned money AND you get the subsidy instead of an already profitable business!
Federal Coal Subsidies
Harvard did a study recently that projected up to coal costing us $500 billion annually!
Government Funding and Loans for Coal Plants
A 2010 report by Synapse Energy Economics, "Phasing Out Federal Subsidies for Coal" found the U.S. federal government provides billions of dollars in subsidies for the coal industry. The report was written by Lucy Johnston (Synapse Energy Economics), Lisa Hamilton (Rockefeller Family Fund), Mark Kresowik (Sierra Club), Tom Sanzillo (TR Rose Associates), and David Schlissel (Schlissel Technical Consulting) and was released on April 13, 2010.
The report identifies four major areas where taxpayer money continues to fund the construction, expansion, and life extension of coal-fired power plants, thus acting as federal coal subsidies:
1. Financial support for the World Bank and other international financial institutions that finance fossil fuel use and extraction;
2. U.S. Treasury Department’s backing of tax exempt bonds and Build America Bonds for use in the electric sector;
3. U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Rural Utilities Service provision of loans, loan guarantees and lien accommodations to power companies that are investing in new or existing coal plants;
4. Tax credits, loans and loan guarantees through the U.S. Department of Energy.
Examples of World Bank Funding
Two recent examples of World Bank support for new coal plants include:
* The 4,000 MW Tata Ultra Mega Power Project in India, with construction funded by the World Bank and the Asian Development Bank. It is scheduled to be completed by 2012.
* South African power company Eskom’s proposed 4,800 MW Medupi Power Station, one of the largest in the world. The World Bank has approved more than $3 billion and the African Development Bank also provided more than $500 million in financial support for the project.
Here is the town in Pennsylvania that had most of its residents move out, mostly due to the State and Federal Govts, not the fire itself: Centralia, PA.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by dawnstar
the only ones who I would listen to as far as gripes about our using coal are the people living in the region who are having their mountains blown up and boulders raining down around them!!! they have a valid gripe, they are being poisoned!!!
Another weird thing, from several years back.....there was an underground coal fire somewhere in WVA that was poisoning the air...strange! I forget all the details, or how it started, but it made an entire town move, if I remember.
In the 2006 horror film Silent Hill, the town of Silent Hill has been abandoned due to a prolonged mine fire, which writer Roger Avary says was inspired by Centralia.[16] Aspects of this are shown throughout the movie, such as characters wandering through the misty version of Silent Hill wearing mining gear.
Coal powered the 1800's and is an archaic and ancient fuel source and is dirty and negatively impacts the enviorment so it is on it's way out.
Originally posted by The Sword
reply to post by mishigas
To be fair, these people are DESTROYING entire mountains just for coal!
That is greed, plain and simple!
And the people who work for them will suffer for years from miner's lung and other ailments.
Good riddance to coal.
To be fair, these people are DESTROYING entire mountains just for coal!
That is greed, plain and simple!
And the people who work for them will suffer for years from miner's lung and other ailments.
Good riddance to coal.
WAKE UP, fool!
You're being played by the right on this debate.
Look at the greed that goes into extracting this coal.
Do you really support destroying entire mountaintops for coal?