www.youtube.com...
Anyone know if anything has changed about this story? Any updates? It has seemed to have gotten quiet straight across the board everywhere.
For some reason I can't stop thinking about this interview. For the first 3/4 I was amazed into almost believing her. She was fluid, absolutely seemed like everything was recall from memory, she never stumbled once, and sounded 100% believable. There were certain specific situations she was talking about like the Vatican story, Xmas, and sleeping in their clothes that seemed like she could pass a lie detector test and couldn't make up.
Then it got weird for me in a couple of key spots.
1) When she spoke of the separation from her husband, fighting him in court, him calling her on the telephone, him coming to see her, all while he wasn't willing to get out of the Illuminati himself. If this was true, and they are programmed to the level she claims, there is just absolutely no way I can by they weren't going to off her, and that he wouldn't provide the information of where she was so they could do just that. If her claims are true, and she is programming (a trainer) shadow squads and/or trained assassins for the military, there is no way on this planet they are going to want someone with her wealth of information walking around freely to tell anyone. She even admitted herself that kids know how to fully take apart a gun, put it back together, and shoot with "deadly" accuracy by the time they are 8. She said they are all trained in martial arts and all sorts of combat. This is obviously a way of life for them then, and they are going to let her walk? They are going to let a programmer (maybe also a deprogrammer) have visitation rights with her kids? Continue to speak with her husband? Arguably, with the list of people that were "supposedly" assassinated by the Illuminati, you are telling me she isn't a more high level target then someone like Tupac with what she knows?? Her court case with her ex-husband for the children was a fight for 4 years, and they never once made a move on her? On top of things, she was actively pulling out others and helping with their deprogramming?? This was just to difficult to swallow for me as truth, if they truly are the caliber of people she stated over and over again throughout her interview. She made many references to how people just don't live to see the light of day the second something goes wrong.
2) Of all the callers that happened to call in, most where old lady religious crankpots. One of them that got through was a lady who said she missed the first half of the interview, and asked questions they already covered, and they recovered it. If she was the real deal, on the air live, wouldn't there be a line of people waiting to call in and ask questions? But some lady who missed the first half just happen to get through with no problem?
3) Now this one doesn't add up at all to me. They have a couple of weirdo callers, and then they have David Wilcock come in out of nowhere. They discuss how they are good friends and email each other frequently, first red flag to me. With all her, "Praise God, by the grace of God, Amen..." statements every five minutes in the second half of the show, and her specifically pointing out over and over again she is a Christian now, and completely believes in Christ... she is buddies with David Wilcock, Mr. New Age himself? She made it sound like she was extreme right wing Christian now, she was rescued by the church, and as the story goes, the church is who helps her stay in hiding now, she is pals with David? Sorry, I can't by that one. If she was truly afraid of Illuminati, I can't by for a second that she is buddying up with someone who is "arguably" in bed with the Illuminati himself, and especially mixing with anyone that is a threat to the Christian religion.
However, I did notice something interesting here. Out of all the callers, and even the guy conducting the interview, David asked the best question of all which is at the beginning of part 10. He asked how the Illuminati was targeting the mainstream audience (us) through media for the different stages of enlightenment. He asked her to really break it down and cover it. Her response was 1 minute and 20 seconds long, and total blanket statement, and all she mentioned was specific movies like Harry Potter and Matrix are examples, but she never went into any details. Out of the entire interview, she spent 1 minute and 20 seconds on probably the most important subject to us, and it was loaded with crap?? She had no problem breaking down anything that was bad about the Illuminati, how evil they were, talking in detail about the young boy she seen sacrificed, and anything that made them look like monsters....
edit on 19-11-2011 by Awoken4Ever because: (no reason given)




