It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

DNC Chair: Republicans Believe Illegal Immigration 'Should be a Crime'

page: 2
30
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on May, 31 2011 @ 05:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by Janky Red

"Obama's" deportation rate is higher than the deportation rate has been in nearly 8 decades



So, if obama does less to stop illegals from coming in, and so there are more of them, he gets to claim a "win" for deporting more of the illegals?

Wasserman-esque logic at it's finest!





posted on May, 31 2011 @ 05:24 PM
link   

Originally posted by Janky Red
"Obama's" deportation rate is higher than the deportation rate has been in nearly 8 decades


this is a flawed statistic due to sheer numbers crossing the border.
Yes you can have more deportations by an increase
of 5% but unless you add in the fact that border crossings
are up by 25% then in actuality deportations have
decreased per ratio by a mere 20%.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 05:25 PM
link   

Originally posted by centurion1211

Originally posted by Janky Red

Originally posted by centurion1211

Originally posted by buster2010
This is why we should have some kind of standardized test for anyone that wants to hold office has to be able to pass. That's what's wrong with this country it's not the Dems or the Repubs it's the idiots we keep voting into office.




Worst part IMO is that it's getting harder and harder to differentiate the stupidity from the outright lies.


Well then, conservatives can just keep their mouths shut and both problems will be solved in an instant


Any conservative saying something this dumb should be held up to the same level of ridicule.

So, is your purpose on this thread to deflect, defend Wasserman, or show that you're also capable of making the same kinds of statements as she has?


My purpose is to agree with this ( because that is all I seem to hear too )



the Republican solution that I’ve seen in the last three years is that we should just pack them all up and ship them back to their own countries and that in fact it should be a crime and we should arrested them all.


Tell me, is she wrong in this assessment?

Should we find all the illegal immigrants, arrest them all and deport them???



really dude

own it if you feel it, no use playing patty cake here
edit on 31-5-2011 by Janky Red because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 05:32 PM
link   

Originally posted by centurion1211

Originally posted by Janky Red

"Obama's" deportation rate is higher than the deportation rate has been in nearly 8 decades



So, if obama does less to stop illegals from coming in, and so there are more of them, he gets to claim a "win" for deporting more of the illegals?

Wasserman-esque logic at it's finest!



So if Obama inherits the worst fiscal mismanagement in history, you get to claim win because he unable to restore the economy in less than a 1,000 days?



I can't help your reading comp there, but I can bold the words which might solve the problem you are experiencing,,, does it sting, badly???



In 2009, the United States deported a record 387,790 people – a 5 percent increase over 2008. Nearly two months before the end of the 2010 federal fiscal year, the deportation rate is down slightly from 2009, but the number of removals is still likely to be more than triple what it was in 2001.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 05:34 PM
link   

Originally posted by Janky Red


the Republican solution that I’ve seen in the last three years is that we should just pack them all up and ship them back to their own countries and that in fact it should be a crime and we should arrested them all.


Tell me, is she wrong in this assessment?


No.


Should we find all the illegal immigrants, arrest them all and deport them???


Sure. Jobs, benefits and welfare for citizens - only.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 05:35 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


President Obama's father was not deported from the Unites States in 1964 or ever. What a ridiculous thing to say.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 05:36 PM
link   

Originally posted by Janky Red

Originally posted by centurion1211

Originally posted by Janky Red

"Obama's" deportation rate is higher than the deportation rate has been in nearly 8 decades



So, if obama does less to stop illegals from coming in, and so there are more of them, he gets to claim a "win" for deporting more of the illegals?

Wasserman-esque logic at it's finest!



So if Obama inherits the worst fiscal mismanagement in history, you get to claim win because he unable to restore the economy in less than a 1,000 days?



No. Since all of obama's moves in the first 1,000 days have arguably only made things worse, or at best not helped at all, he does not get to claim a win. In fact, we're all the losers for his efforts.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 05:43 PM
link   

Originally posted by centurion1211

Originally posted by Janky Red


the Republican solution that I’ve seen in the last three years is that we should just pack them all up and ship them back to their own countries and that in fact it should be a crime and we should arrested them all.


Tell me, is she wrong in this assessment?


No.


Should we find all the illegal immigrants, arrest them all and deport them???


Sure. Jobs, benefits and welfare for citizens - only.



Cool

I agree with you on the last line



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 06:04 PM
link   
reply to post by macman
 


trespassing perhaps?.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 06:05 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by boondock-saint
 

President Obama's father was not deported from the Unites States in 1964 or ever. What a ridiculous thing to say.


maybe you should research on subjects before you speak
else it makes you look incompetent.



document above from INS shows Obama deported from
the US in NY in July 1964 just as I said.

Care to call me out again ???



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 06:12 PM
link   
yep this ranks up there with the most stupid comments ever said by the left

including guam might tip over.

illegals are criminals.

i guess it takes one to know one

criminal polticians should recognize criminal activity.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 07:10 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


I do care to call you out again. From the very site you linked.


Documents show that Obama, Sr. was denied an extension on his student visa in July, 1964, in part because Harvard University, where Obama, Sr., was a Ph.D. candidate, sought his removal. Obama Sr. eventually left the United States willingly after becoming an illegal alien for remaining in the country past the expiration of his visa.

Source

His application for another extension of his student visa was denied (not sure why he needed one being married to american citizen) but he was in fact not deported.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 07:22 PM
link   

Originally posted by buster2010
This is why we should have some kind of standardized test for anyone that wants to hold office has to be able to pass. That's what's wrong with this country it's not the Dems or the Repubs it's the idiots we keep voting into office.


You sir are ABSOLUTELY correct, furthermore I would add, I think every candidate for any public office, needs to complete a course on ethics and their score printed on the ballot right next to their name.

They will also have needed to complete, from an accredited source, a course on American History and the Constitution as part of the vetting process.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 08:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by boondock-saint
 

I do care to call you out again. From the very site you linked.

His application for another extension of his student visa was denied (not sure why he needed one being married to american citizen) but he was in fact not deported.


He was not legally married to an American Citizen.
Hawaii law does not allow marriage if that person
is already married. Since INS found Obama Sr.
was already married in Kenya, then his marriage
to Ann Dunham was illegal under law. Obama Sr.
lied to get married to Ann Dunham. He lied on his
INS paperwork to enter the US when he claimed he
was not married. Thusly why he never got a green card
from INS and was deported when his visa ran out.
And it appears Obama Jr. is basically doing the same thing
about his own INS documentation. Like father, like son.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 08:42 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


I'm not quite sure it was proven he was married in Kenya, but that doesn't matter because some blogger told it was so, right? As far as the President goes, wouldn't you be needing inter-galactic documentation to be satisfied? Considering you think he's an alien hybrid...gosh if only the CIA had done a better job making his palms look different...I'm sure they're working on it as we speak since you outed them.

Either way Obama Sr, was not deported so whatever document you posted is just another piece of made up crap by one of your hero bloggers...which you failed to address in your reply.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 08:58 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


I'm not quite sure it was proven he was married in Kenya, but that doesn't matter because some blogger told it was so, right?


Nope, no blogger.
Paperwork from the INS investigation
into Obama Sr. shows he had multiple
wives whom he was still married to
at the time he entered the US in 1959.

One wife from the Philippines whom he
was separated from but no legally divorced
from and also a wife in Kenya whom he
was still married to and had children with.
ALL BEFORE marrying Ann Dunham.
Couple this with the fact that Obama
lied on his US student visa that he had
no wives at all. Shows intent to falsify
legal documents. See INS paperwork
below to show 2 wives before Ann Dunham.



Thusly making his marriage to Ann Dunham
illegal.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 09:03 PM
link   
 


off-topic post removed to prevent thread-drift


 



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 09:04 PM
link   
reply to post by centurion1211
 


It's called "changing the narritive". When we get redirected because of fools like this person, the whole topic of using existing federal law to puish those that break the existing laws gets pushed into the background.

I find these people despicable.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 09:08 PM
link   
reply to post by boondock-saint
 


Oh yes, shill...you know I should thank-you, you've made my paycheck entertaining at least.
Anyway back on topic, since Obama Sr. was not deported I see no reason for our President to be motivated to be slack on illegal immigration.



posted on May, 31 2011 @ 09:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by Kali74
since Obama Sr. was not deported I see no reason for our President to be motivated to be slack on illegal immigration.


the psychological impact on a child who
cannot see his father due to immigration laws
can most def skew a person's viewpoint
on the matter. It shows motive.

And you say he was not deported.
What would you call a directive to
leave the US by a certain date cuz
he had overstayed his visa ???
What would you call that if not
being deported ???

Obama Sr. could have been prosecuted
for falsifying INS documentation PLUS
the illegal marriage to Ann Dunham.
But it was much simpler to just kick
him out of the country.



new topics

top topics



 
30
<< 1    3  4  5 >>

log in

join