It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NorthStargal52
I would think that would of been really simple as he had a flag and all he would had to do is let go of it with of course some type of string attached so the it didn’t fly off into space somewhere lol . oh I’m being silly aren’t I ..
But seriously I am not being silly,, the rover itself would of flipped over during turns do to the gravity issue everyone seems to ignore
Originally posted by weedwhacker
reply to post by NorthStargal52
You have a lot to learn, and man, many misconceptions to remove, it is obvious.....before you will be able to comprehend, fully the science and technical details. See, this question:
Can someone tell me where any one of the two Aldrin or Armstrong demonstrated anything being weightless after they stepped out of the module ??
THAT question is based on poor understanding, and flawed assumptions, from the outset.
The Moon has a gravitational field....so, when on the surface, you are not "weightless".
Why don't you find the nearest library, get a card, and start borrowing some books....to read up on, and learn about, the Space Program. Take a few months, you have a long way to go.......
Originally posted by wasco2
Originally posted by NorthStargal52
I would think that would of been really simple as he had a flag and all he would had to do is let go of it with of course some type of string attached so the it didn’t fly off into space somewhere lol . oh I’m being silly aren’t I ..
But seriously I am not being silly,, the rover itself would of flipped over during turns do to the gravity issue everyone seems to ignore
Yes, yes you are.
I'm going to try this one more time. The gravity issue you say people are ignoring IS NOT REAL. The moon HAS gravity, not as much as earth but still a significant amount. Everyone ignores your "gravity issue" because even most moon hoax conspiracy theorists KNOW the moon has gravity. Maybe you were thinking about atmosphere? The moon does not have an atmosphere.
If you drop something on the moon, it falls. It just accelerates at a slower rate (9.8 m/s^2 on Earth, 1.63 m/s^2 on the moon). So no, nothing would "float" on the moon.
Originally posted by NorthStargal52
Ok my mistake your right it has no atmosphere .. I meant the environment they were in .. still at your claim things would be floating is that not true ?? and can you prove different if you had a can that weighed 1 pound and let go of it while you were on the moon tell me what would happen to that can would it fall to the moon surface or what would happen to it ??
I never said it had no gravity I said they never proved or demonstrated it while they were on the moon and the rover wel it just dont figure out right .. but one thing at a time .. what would happen to that can if you let go of it ??
....which means they had no idea what that debris they claim to have brought back wieghed.. where was the scale ??
....the moon is approximately 1/6 of that of the Earth. For example, I weigh 200 lbs. On the moon I would weigh 33 lbs ...
I would say, as others have, that your understanding of gravity is flawed. As I stated, there is still gravity on the moon. The acceleration induced by it is around 1/6th that of earth. So that means that things still do fall towards the moon.
Originally posted by NorthStargal52
reply to post by nataylor
LOL haha that was so funny .. but yet as he walks away his steps were obviously showing a bit of gravity loss .. wow what a magical show .. yeah wonder what magicians they contacted firsr to get some advice as how to make a vid like this .. great try but not at all impressed .. now try reading what others have said about gravity while at NASA .. floating around in that simulated wieghtlesness compartment .. id like to see what a feather would do in there lol
Originally posted by NorthStargal52
We hoax believers have told our side and yet everything we stated and brought out was so conveniently mutilated and manipulated an twisted around just like in this thread .. but when it comes down to really showing all the evidence and proof we have asked for .. nothing was ever gained .. just lousy weak explanations for every question asked which creates this circle of... im right your wrong .. and that’s where its really at ..
Originally posted by Illustronic
Some go so far as saying it was robotics that brought the samples back while also saying the Russians were 20 years ahead of the Americans with extra-planetary robotics. Quite funny don't you think? You let a conspiracy theorist explain his beliefs long enough he contradicts his own belief logic. Funny/sad.
Originally posted by Illustronic
reply to post by manmental
Go to the Hubble Space Telescope site and learn a bit about its imagery. You can see Hubble photos of the Apollo landings there, they are inferior to the LROC photos because it is not designed to photograph the moon!
Originally posted by manmental
AWESOME DUDE.. I'd love to be sure we landed on the moon!
Originally posted by Logical one
Originally posted by manmental
AWESOME DUDE.. I'd love to be sure we landed on the moon!
And you explain the moon rocks how exactly........I'd love to be sure you have the proof to disprove the Apollo moon rocks!edit on 29-5-2011 by Logical one because: (no reason given)