It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Glen say's to Buz : Oh look at that rock it soo purdy.. I want to take that one back to earth
Buz rolls his eyes smiles with delightment and says to Glen: Ok here is a zip lock baggie now get some moon dust in there too .. so I can put in a jar an show it off to the whole family ..hahaha
That's been very clear to many people .. that those who have been seeking answers to many legit questions .. regarding space exploration and moon missions..go unanswered.
Why are thre no pictures of the Surveyor?
When In fact they have telescopes and what have you to show images of Mars ??
So if they can do this why not on mars to show where the left behind artifacts?
Originally posted by manmental
Well the fact that unmanned USSR Lunar missions have brought back samples from the moon makes me wonder if NASA couldn't do the very same thing. Just with a bigger payload.
Then there is the fact that moon rocks have been discovered on earth no less.
So, those are a few reasons why I don't think the 'moon' rocks are definitive proof that man set foot on the moon.
Originally posted by manmental
If NASA could supposedely get men to the moon and back then it's not a stretch of the imagination that they could get loads of rocks back.
Originally posted by NorthStargal52
...Moon rocks still have moon germs .. and contain harmfull stuff to the human ..
Originally posted by TamtammyMacx
Wow! Doesn't the backgound in that picture look like the backdrops for Apollo 15. Hadley Rille?
Originally posted by manmental
reply to post by Illustronic
I have seen the photo's from Hubble just a couple of days ago
Which photos? Please, enlighten me... I just checked their official site. Where are they? Link please.
Originally posted by manmental
reply to post by weedwhacker
Hi Weed. What a surprise... you find my views worthless and accuse me of being dishonest.
If NASA could supposedely get men to the moon and back then it's not a stretch of the imagination that they could get loads of rocks back. I find both ideas as silly as each other.
Moon rocks have been found in Antartica... who cares when and who says they weren't found earlier? If a new species is discovered in 1972 does that mean it didn't exist before then? Silly.
Are your saying Werner didn't go to Antartica in 1967? Because NASA thinks he did. What he was doing is anyone's guess but I guess you'll take NASA's word for it.
history.msfc.nasa.gov...
I'm sorry you didn't like the blog I referenced. The links in the blog, if you had bothered reading it go to reputable sources.
Originally posted by weedwhacker
BTW.....What About The Photos From Lunar Orbit??
OF the Apollo equipment on the Moon? And, the evident disturbance in the ground, from the Astronauts' movements?? It is clearly evident, for all to see.
Originally posted by NorthStargal52
If in fact you buy into the fact that they really went to the moon why then on NASA’s site do they show one of the astronauts carrying the samples back in a special concealed box ? And no im not posting it when anyone can go see it for them selves
www.nasa.gov...