It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Skippy1138
reply to post by David9176
Take off the partisan blinders for 2 seconds- every ex-president does this-do you know how much Clinton pulls down a year from this exact same thing?
Originally posted by jibeho
Bush, Clinton, Gore, Cheney all will speak to whomever writes the check. That's what public speaking is all about. People actually make careers in this line of work.
If we are going to put Bush through the wringer we have to put them all through the wringer. I'm certain that they have all had their fair share of interesting speaking engagements..
$15 million... for speaking. C'mon, even the die-hard supporters of Dubya can admit that "speaking" was probably not his strong point.
Originally posted by jibeho
Bush, Clinton, Gore, Cheney all will speak to whomever writes the check. That's what public speaking is all about. People actually make careers in this line of work.
If we are going to put Bush through the wringer we have to put them all through the wringer. I'm certain that they have all had their fair share of interesting speaking engagements..
Why is it that you and everyone else apologizing for Bush in this thread are missing the point? The criticism is notthat he is speaking for money, but WHO he is speaking to. The OP makes this VERY clear, and yet here you are still trying to shift the focus.
Originally posted by mishigas
So, the Bill of Rights doesn't apply to Bush's audiences unless they meet with your biased approval? Sounds like you approve of censorship and burning of books, too.
Originally posted by mishigas
So, the Bill of Rights doesn't apply to Bush's audiences unless they meet with your biased approval? Sounds like you approve of censorship and burning of books, too.
Originally posted by ManBehindTheMask
....................seriously?
Are we still on george bush? With all the crap that the current president is on, people are still trying to pull the ol Bush card?
Just sayin I dont understand why this has any relevance?
And what you have in bold, he already had booked and they probably already had paid for, he was obligated......besides I notice you didnt post WHY Bush said he didnt show up......
Keep pandering to Obama and bashin Bush..........Obama is leaving his own legacy of idiocy that threatens to rival any president weve ever hadedit on 20-5-2011 by ManBehindTheMask because: (no reason given)
Well, chalk another one up on the "completely missed the point" board.
The fact that he was giving private speeches to such controversial organizations and receiving much higher-than-average (even for a former president) compensation is slightly revealing about his inner ties that he held while president.
That's the crux of it. Nobody cares that he's giving speeches. More power to him.
However, it should be painfully obvious to everyone at this point that Bush was in the pockets of these outside financial interests.
Originally posted by mishigas
Well, chalk another one up to the "accuse Bush of pandering to his 'inner ties' without a shred of proof, but I know it's true because I feel this way" idjut who plays judge, jury, and executioner partisan liberal Obama sycophant.
In other words, don't be so naive, bunky. When Boy Blunder leaves office, SEIU will be paying his worthless ass tons of money for all the graft he shoveled their way while in the WH.
If you dont see how this points to how Bush is likely getting his payoff from the special interests who put him in power, that's your choice.
Originally posted by incrediblelousminds
Originally posted by jibeho
Bush, Clinton, Gore, Cheney all will speak to whomever writes the check. That's what public speaking is all about. People actually make careers in this line of work.
If we are going to put Bush through the wringer we have to put them all through the wringer. I'm certain that they have all had their fair share of interesting speaking engagements..
Why is it that you and everyone else apologizing for Bush in this thread are missing the point? The criticism is notthat he is speaking for money, but WHO he is speaking to. The OP makes this VERY clear, and yet here you are still trying to shift the focus.
Originally posted by mishigas
Likely getting his payoff? Got any proof, Eugene? Have any charges been filed against him? Or are you just spouting innuendo and subjective feelings like a good little liberal?
Originally posted by mishigas
In other words, don't be so naive, bunky. When Boy Blunder leaves office, SEIU will be paying his worthless ass tons of money for all the graft he shoveled their way while in the WH.
I see. So you are saying it's 'naive' to say that this points to Bush being paid back for all his favors while in office, but then turn around and say that Obama will likely be getting payoffs after his presidency for HIS favors?
I;m spinning in partisan contradiction.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
I see. So you are saying it's 'naive' to say that this points to Bush being paid back for all his favors while in office, but then turn around and say that Obama will likely be getting payoffs after his presidency for HIS favors?
I;m spinning in partisan contradiction.
No, it's just your lack of reading comprehension that is once again giving you the vapors. He, and you, are naive because you seem to think, and infer, that Bush is the first to reap what he sowed. Your dilemma over partisan contradiction is self-inflicted, due to speaking beyond the scope of your text.
Originally posted by mishigas
reply to post by incrediblelousminds
If you dont see how this points to how Bush is likely getting his payoff from the special interests who put him in power, that's your choice.
Likely getting his payoff? Got any proof, Eugene? Have any charges been filed against him? Or are you just spouting innuendo and subjective feelings like a good little liberal?
Originally posted by mishigas
In other words, don't be so naive, bunky. When Boy Blunder leaves office, SEIU will be paying his worthless ass tons of money for all the graft he shoveled their way while in the WH.