It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Yes I thought it was bloody amazing that the boxes were destroyed (never heard of that occurring before) but they were able to find a bunch of paper passports. Go figure !!! At least 6 of the guys they accused of being terrorists and dying in the explosions are apparently still alive. Go figure !!!
Originally posted by yyyyyyyyyy
reply to post by GenRadek
These "unsupported" transactions do not mean the department ultimately cannot account for them, she advised' end quote - wow, deliberately vague, ultimately it could also mean it can't be accounted for but then you can expect politicians and proxies to misrepresent the truth.
...'$370 billion; and it maintains more than $1 trillion in assets, she remarked.' end quote
With a budget that big and accountancy holes seemingly so huge, it could only be a fool who thinks there was no possibility that some money was diverted to provide funding for an false flag attack. Add to that statistical probability that some working there are high functioning psychopaths or have a criminal inclination.
Peaceedit on 3-6-2011 by yyyyyyyyyy because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Darkwing01
Oh look, a demolition with no explosive noises:
Oh and look, here's another:
Interestingly enough, a little digging turned up this little video with slightly better sound quality on the crane collapse cited earlier:
Notice that it doesn't much sound like explosives anymore?
Seriously guys, there is no dishonor in admitting you are wrong from time to time.
Originally posted by Darkwing01
Oh look, a demolition with no explosive noises:
Oh and look, here's another:
Seriously guys, there is no dishonor in admitting you are wrong from time to time.
The fact many of the "terrorists" were later found to be alive has been common knowledge for agers, there is no excuse for not even looking.
Originally posted by bsbray11
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
That you are completely out of your depth.
And have never balanced a checkbook in your life....
Seriously, what are you trying to argue? That the Pentagon didn't really lose any money, that it was all just writing down numbers wrong or something?
Is that what it looks like the above article says to you?
Originally posted by bsbray11
Anyway "Joey" is apparently trying to argue that somebody just wrote down some numbers wrong somewhere which is a total misinterpretation of the article.
Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Are you self styled "truthers" so seduced by your damned fool conspiracy web sites that you're even going to willfully ignore such outrageously fake information they're feeding you?
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by bsbray11
Seriously, what are you trying to argue? That the Pentagon didn't really lose any money, that it was all just writing down numbers wrong or something?
Is that what it looks like the above article says to you?
Yes.
This is exactly what these articles are saying.
Originally posted by Joey Canoli
Originally posted by bsbray11
Anyway "Joey" is apparently trying to argue that somebody just wrote down some numbers wrong somewhere which is a total misinterpretation of the article.
No, that's not at all what I'm saying.
For myself, the answers to all of those questions would be more than once.
Originally posted by laiguana
Quite frankly...any structural engineers, given their time in the field is more credible than anyone on this forum
The only proper way of addressing questionable aspects in relation to the collapse of building 7 is having individual specialists, engineers and related experts in the field analyze the evidence that is still available to them.
What little evidence is still there to go on....given that the clean up crew got at it soon after the actual collapse.